World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
33
Citations
3275
World Ranking
946
National Ranking
7

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4447
World Ranking
9615
National Ranking
88

Jonas R. Kunst publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas R. Kunst sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonas R. Kunst D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas R. Kunst sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Jonas R. Kunst is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research focuses primarily within the social sciences and psychology, with a significant emphasis on sociology and political science as well as social psychology. Their work engages with various subfields, including clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and health.

The researcher has contributed extensively to topics related to social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, and racial and ethnic identity research. Additional areas of study include misinformation and its impacts, terrorism, counterterrorism, and political violence, as well as the psychology of moral and emotional judgment and social and cultural dynamics.

Jonas R. Kunst has published numerous papers in frequent venues such as:

  • International Journal of Intercultural Relations
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jonas R. Kunst include:

  • Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories Reduces Social Distancing over Time (2020), published in Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
  • The "Great Replacement" conspiracy: How the perceived ousting of Whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia (2021), published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis (2022), published in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Revisiting the Integration Hypothesis: Correlational and Longitudinal Meta-Analyses Demonstrate the Limited Role of Acculturation for Cross-Cultural Adaptation (2021), published in Psychological Science
  • Why do youth participate in climate activism? A mixed-methods investigation of the #FridaysForFuture climate protests. (2021), published in Journal of Environmental Psychology

Throughout their career, Jonas has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Milan Obaidi
  • Kinga Bierwiaczonek
  • Aleksander B. Gundersen
  • Jan Piasecki
  • Rafał Ryguła

Best Publications

  • Meat eaters by dissociation: How we present, prepare and talk about meat increases willingness to eat meat by reducing empathy and disgust.

    Jonas R. Kunst;Jonas R. Kunst;Sigrid M. Hohle

  • Coping with Islamophobia : the effects of religious stigma on muslim minorities' identity formation

    Jonas R. Kunst;Hajra Tajamal;David L. Sam;Pål Ulleberg

  • Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories Reduces Social Distancing over Time.

    Kinga Maria Bierwiaczonek;Kinga Maria Bierwiaczonek;Jonas R. Kunst;Olivia Pich

  • Living under threat: Mutual threat perception drives anti-Muslim and anti-Western hostility in the age of terrorism

    Milan Obaidi;Jonas R. Kunst;Nour Kteily;Lotte Thomsen

  • Sexism, Rape Myths and Feminist Identification Explain Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward the #metoo Social Media Campaign in Two Countries

    Jonas R. Kunst;April Bailey;Claire Prendergast;Aleksander Gundersen

  • Perceived islamophobia: Scale development and validation

    Jonas R. Kunst;David L. Sam;Pål Ulleberg

  • Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies

    Jonas R. Kunst;Jonas R. Kunst;Ronald Fischer;Jim Sidanius;Lotte Thomsen;Lotte Thomsen

  • “We Are in This Together” Common Group Identity Predicts Majority Members’ Active Acculturation Efforts to Integrate Immigrants

    Jonas R. Kunst;Jonas R. Kunst;Jonas R. Kunst;Lotte Thomsen;Lotte Thomsen;Lotte Thomsen;David L. Sam;John W. Berry

  • A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ke Wang;Amit Goldenberg;Charles A. Dorison;Jeremy K. Miller

  • The “Great Replacement” conspiracy: How the perceived ousting of Whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia:

    Milan Obaidi;Jonas Kunst;Simon Ozer;Sasha Y. Kimel

  • Relationship between perceived acculturation expectations and Muslim minority youth's acculturation and adaptation

    Jonas R. Kunst;David L. Sam

  • Revisiting the Integration Hypothesis: Correlational and Longitudinal Meta-Analyses Demonstrate the Limited Role of Acculturation for Cross-Cultural Adaptation

    Kinga Bierwiaczonek;Jonas R Kunst

  • Engaging in extreme activism in support of others' political struggles : The role of politically motivated fusion with out-groups

    Jonas R. Kunst;Jonas R. Kunst;Beverly Boos;Sasha Y. Kimel;Milan Obaidi

  • Why do youth participate in climate activism? A mixed-methods investigation of the #FridaysForFuture climate protests.

    Christian A.P. Haugestad;Anja Duun Skauge;Jonas R. Kunst;Séamus A. Power

  • Understanding violent extremism in the 21st century: the (re)emerging role of relative deprivation.

    Jonas R Kunst;Milan Obaidi

  • A global test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Unknown

  • Dissociating Meat from its Animal Origins: A Systematic Literature Review

    Nora C.G. Benningstad;Jonas R. Kunst

  • The missing side of acculturation : how majority-group members relate to immigrant and minority-group cultures

    Jonas R. Kunst;Katharina Lefringhausen;David L. Sam;John W. Berry;John W. Berry

  • Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings

    Thomas Haarklau Kleppestø;Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski;Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski;Olav Vassend;Espen Røysamb;Espen Røysamb

  • Living in a Genetic World How Learning About Interethnic Genetic Similarities and Differences Affects Peace and Conflict

    Sasha Y. Kimel;Rowell Huesmann;Jonas R. Kunst;Eran Halperin

  • A two-way process? A qualitative and quantitative investigation of majority members’ acculturation

    Ingvild Haugen;Jonas R. Kunst

  • The effects of dissociation on willingness to eat meat are moderated by exposure to unprocessed meat: A cross-cultural demonstration

    Jonas R. Kunst;Christian Andrés Palacios Haugestad

  • How Political and Social Trust Can Impact Social Distancing Practices During COVID-19 in Unexpected Ways

    Frederike S Woelfert;Frederike S Woelfert;Jonas R Kunst

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Sam
David L. Sam University of Bergen
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Jim Sidanius
Jim Sidanius Harvard University
John W. Berry
John W. Berry Queen's University
Nour Kteily
Nour Kteily Northwestern University
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti University of Helsinki
Jolanda Jetten
Jolanda Jetten University of Queensland
Espen Røysamb
Espen Røysamb University of Oslo
Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski
Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski University of Oslo
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to numerous online study opportunities and professional careers in mental health and counseling. With flexible options for remote learning, you can find respected programs across the United States that suit your goals and lifestyle.

For students interested in the West Coast, California online counseling programs offer a combination of practical training and academic rigor. If you are considering Pennsylvania, there are several best online master's in counseling degree programs in Pennsylvania to help you advance your credentials.

Those looking for a nationwide perspective can explore the best online master's in counseling degree programs in the US, which highlight top institutions and flexible options for both full-time students and working professionals. Meanwhile, students in Texas have access to accredited online counseling degrees in Texas, preparing graduates for state licensure and dynamic roles in diverse settings.

Whether you are aiming for a career as a mental health counselor, school counselor, or pursuing specialized fields, these online programs pave multiple career pathways in psychology, offering both convenience and quality.

Best Scientists Citing Jonas R. Kunst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles