World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
111
Citations
61606
World Ranking
5248
National Ranking
519

George C. Ebers publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George C. Ebers sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 572 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George C. Ebers D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George C. Ebers sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

George C. Ebers is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily within the field of Medicine, with specific work in subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's recent publication record includes a paper titled Teaching Neuro Images: Headache with pulsatile tinnitus, published in 2023 in the journal Neurology. This paper reflects their contributions to neurological research and is a representation of their active engagement with contemporary medical issues.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Richard Armstrong
  • Jonathan Downer
  • Natalie Evans
  • Philip Anslow

Their work has been featured primarily in the journal Neurology, highlighting a focused dissemination within specialized medical research venues.

Main topics addressed by George C. Ebers encompass:

  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
  • Meningioma and schwannoma management

This selection of topics indicates a concentrated interest in neurological and ophthalmological conditions, with a particular emphasis on pain disorders and tumor management in the nervous system.

Best Publications

  • New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols.

    C M Poser;D W Paty;L Scheinberg;W I McDonald

  • The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability.

    B. G. Weinshenker;B. Bass;G. P. A. Rice;J. Noseworthy

  • Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of interferon β-1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis

    George C Ebers

  • The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 5. The clinical features and natural history of primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

    D. A. Cottrell;M. Kremenchutzky;G. P. A. Rice;W. J. Koopman

  • Sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in Canada: a longitudinal study

    Sarah Michelle Orton;Blanca M. Herrera;Irene M. Yee;William Valdar

  • A ChIP-seq defined genome-wide map of vitamin D receptor binding: associations with disease and evolution.

    Sreeram V. Ramagopalan;Andreas Heger;Antonio J. Berlanga;Narelle J. Maugeri

  • A genetic basis for familial aggregation in multiple sclerosis

    G. C. Ebers;A. D. Sadovnick;N. J. Risch

  • The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course.

    B. G. Weinshenker;B. Bass;G. P. A. Rice;J. Noseworthy

  • A Population-Based Study of Multiple Sclerosis in Twins

    G C Ebers;D E Bulman;A D Sadovnick;D W Paty

  • Environmental factors and multiple sclerosis

    George C Ebers

  • A full genome search in multiple sclerosis

    G C Ebers;K Kukay;D E Bulman;A D Sadovnick

  • Genetics of multiple sclerosis

    David A Dyment;George C Ebers;A Dessa Sadovnick

  • TNF neutralization in MS - Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study

    Arnason Bgw.;G Jacobs;M Hanlon;B H Clay

  • The natural history of multiple sclerosis, a geographically based study 10: relapses and long-term disability

    Antonio Scalfari;Anneke Neuhaus;Alexandra Degenhardt;George P. Rice

  • Twin concordance and sibling recurrence rates in multiple sclerosis

    C. J. Willer;D. A. Dyment;N. J. Risch;A. D. Sadovnick

  • PRISMS-4: Long-term efficacy of interferon-beta-1a in relapsing MS

    G Francis;R Hughes;J King;P Mitchell

  • Expression of the Multiple Sclerosis-Associated MHC Class II Allele HLA-DRB1*1501 Is Regulated by Vitamin D

    Sreeram V. Ramagopalan;Narelle J. Maugeri;Lahiru Handunnetthi;Lahiru Handunnetthi;Matthew R. Lincoln;Matthew R. Lincoln

  • Timing of birth and risk of multiple sclerosis: population based study

    C J Willer;D A Dyment;A D Sadovnick;P M Rothwell

  • A population‐based study of multiple sclerosis in twins: Update

    A. D. Sadovnick;H. Armstrong;G. P. A. Rice;D. Bulman

  • The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 3. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors and models of outcome.

    B. G. Weinshenker;G. P. A. Rice;J. H. Noseworthy;W. Carriere

Frequent Co-Authors

Sreeram V. Ramagopalan
Sreeram V. Ramagopalan University of Oxford
David A. Dyment
David A. Dyment University of Ottawa
Gavin Giovannoni
Gavin Giovannoni Queen Mary University of London
Neil Risch
Neil Risch University of California, San Francisco
Anthony T. Reder
Anthony T. Reder University of Chicago
Cristen J. Willer
Cristen J. Willer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Douglas S. Goodin
Douglas S. Goodin University of California, San Francisco
Dennis E. Bulman
Dennis E. Bulman Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Dawn Langdon
Dawn Langdon Royal Holloway University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing medicine in the USA opens doors to many related fields and flexible career options through online study. Students interested in preventive care and wellness may consider exploring online nutrition degrees, which provide foundational knowledge in dietetics and health science.

Aspiring healthcare leaders should understand how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs, especially when choosing between various CAHME-accredited online MHA programs. These roles are vital for managing hospitals and other medical organizations.

Registered nurses wishing to advance may be interested in rn to bsn programs no clinicals, ideal for those seeking greater flexibility or facing scheduling barriers to in-person clinicals. These programs can help nurses expand their skills and unlock new opportunities.

For nurses looking to reach the highest clinical levels, pursuing online dnp programs offers a pathway to leadership, advanced practice, and greater earning potential. Online pathways make these advanced degrees more accessible for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing George C. Ebers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles