World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 6007 5644 3213 2978 777 42374

Bianca Weinstock-Guttman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bianca Weinstock-Guttman between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bianca Weinstock-Guttman published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 27.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2018. 71 of the 846 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2018. 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 42 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 53 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 67 publications 2019: 66 publications 2020: 57 publications 2021: 49 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 29 publications
1995 2025

846 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 4
1996 4
1997 5
1998 6
1999 2
2000 6
2001 3
2002 3
2003 8
2004 10
2005 10
2006 13
2007 23
2008 14
2009 23
2010 25
2011 42
2012 46
2013 43
2014 45
2015 32
2016 53
2017 37
2018 67
2019 66
2020 57
2021 49
2022 42
2023 37
2024 42
2025 29
Total 846
Download as CSV

Bianca Weinstock-Guttman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bianca Weinstock-Guttman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 777 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 777
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bianca Weinstock-Guttman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bianca Weinstock-Guttman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bianca Weinstock-Guttman is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant concentration in pathology and forensic medicine, neurology, rheumatology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and molecular biology.

Their work extensively covers multiple sclerosis research studies, peripheral neuropathies and disorders, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, polyomavirus-related diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus research, rheumatoid arthritis research and therapies, and the long-term effects of COVID-19.

Some of their recent publications include:

  • Multiple sclerosis (2023), The Lancet
  • Real-World Effectiveness of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapies in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis (2020), Annals of Neurology
  • Improved relapse recovery in paediatric compared to adult multiple sclerosis (2020), Brain
  • Multiple Sclerosis in Children: Differential Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Disease-Modifying Treatment (2021), CNS Drugs
  • Association of Choroid Plexus Inflammation on MRI With Clinical Disability Progression Over 5 Years in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (2022), Neurology

Weinstock-Guttman frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Robert Zivadinov, Dejan Jakimovski, Michael G. Dwyer, Niels Bergsland, and Ralph H. B. Benedict. These collaborations reflect a network focused on neurological research and multiple sclerosis studies.

Their work has been published in several venues, with notable frequent contributions to Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Journal of Neurology, and Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology.

Best Publications

  • Intramuscular interferon beta-1a for disease progression in relapsing multiple sclerosis

    Lawrence D. Jacobs;Diane L. Cookfair;Richard A. Rudick;Robert M. Herndon

  • Natalizumab plus Interferon Beta-1a for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

    Richard A. Rudick;William H. Stuart;Peter A. Calabresi;Christian Confavreux

  • Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACFIMS)

    Ralph H.B. Benedict;Diane Cookfair;Rebecca Gavett;Mark Gunther

  • Predicting quality of life in multiple sclerosis: accounting for physical disability, fatigue, cognition, mood disorder, personality, and behavior change.

    Ralph H.B. Benedict;Elizabeth Wahlig;Rohit Bakshi;Inna Fishman

  • Thalamic atrophy and cognition in multiple sclerosis

    M. K. Houtchens;R.H.B. Benedict;R. Killiany;J. Sharma

  • Prediction of Neuropsychological Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis Comparison of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures of Atrophy and Lesion Burden

    Ralph H. B. Benedict;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman;Inna Fishman;Jitendra Sharma

  • Eight-year follow-up study of brain atrophy in patients with MS

    E. Fisher;R. A. Rudick;J. H. Simon;G. Cutter

  • Magnetic resonance studies of intramuscular interferon β-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis

    Jack H. Simon;Lawrence D. Jacobs;Marilyn Campion;Karl Wende

  • Clinical features and viral serologies in children with multiple sclerosis: a multinational observational study

    Brenda Banwell;Lauren Krupp;Julia Kennedy;Raymond Tellier

  • Neocortical Atrophy, Third Ventricular Width, and Cognitive Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis

    Ralph H. B. Benedict;Jared M. Bruce;Michael G. Dwyer;Nadir Abdelrahman

  • Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen in multiple sclerosis.

    R H B Benedict;I Fishman;M M McClellan;R Bakshi

  • The incidence and significance of anti-natalizumab antibodies: Results from AFFIRM and SENTINEL

    P. A. Calabresi;G. Giovannoni;C. Confavreux;S. L. Galetta

  • Basal ganglia, thalamus and neocortical atrophy predicting slowed cognitive processing in multiple sclerosis

    Sonia Batista;Robert Zivadinov;Marietta Hoogs;Niels Bergsland

  • Screening for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test

    B A Parmenter;B Weinstock-Guttman;N Garg;F Munschauer

  • Gray and white matter brain atrophy and neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis.

    Michael P. Sanfilipo;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman;Rohit Bakshi

  • Incidence and significance of neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis

    Richard A. Rudick;N. A. Simonian;J. A. Alam;M. Campion

  • Clinical characteristics of African Americans vs Caucasian Americans with multiple sclerosis

    B. A.C. Cree;O. Khan;D. Bourdette;D. S. Goodin

  • Psychometrics and normative data for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite: replacing the PASAT with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test

    A S Drake;B Weinstock-Guttman;S A Morrow;D Hojnacki

  • Reliable screening for neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis.

    Ralph H. B. Benedict;Darcy Cox;Laetitia L. Thompson;Fred Foley

  • The interferons: biological effects, mechanisms of action, and use in multiple sclerosis.

    Weinstock-Guttman B;Ransohoff Rm;Kinkel Rp;Rudick Ra

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Zivadinov
Robert Zivadinov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Michael G. Dwyer
Michael G. Dwyer University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Niels Bergsland
Niels Bergsland University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Tanuja Chitnis
Tanuja Chitnis Harvard University
Moses Rodriguez
Moses Rodriguez Mayo Clinic
Emmanuelle Waubant
Emmanuelle Waubant University of California, San Francisco
Lauren B. Krupp
Lauren B. Krupp New York University
Richard A. Rudick
Richard A. Rudick Biogen (United States)
Eva Havrdova
Eva Havrdova Charles University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in alternative routes or stepping stones in healthcare? Today, many students explore online programs for greater flexibility and accessibility. For registered nurses aiming to advance, the cheapest bsn programs provide an affordable path to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, often boosting career potential.

Those without a nursing background but eager to enter the field quickly might consider msn direct entry programs online. These intensive programs can lead to a Master of Science in Nursing—even for non-nurses—helping you fast-track into advanced practice roles.

If you’re searching for more accessible academic entry points, easiest rn program options may be ideal. These programs offer streamlined admission requirements, letting you begin your nursing journey sooner.

Not sure about clinical roles? There are broader healthcare careers available too. Check out online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa for reputable and financially-supported pathways into health administration and billing.

Best Scientists Citing Bianca Weinstock-Guttman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles