World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 63 3410 3120 1581 1430 393 12827

Michael G. Dwyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael G. Dwyer between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael G. Dwyer published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 19.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2024. 69 of the 435 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2024. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 43 publications 2025: 26 publications
2004 2025

435 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael G. Dwyer: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 5
2008 8
2009 11
2010 9
2011 11
2012 19
2013 23
2014 20
2015 19
2016 18
2017 25
2018 36
2019 39
2020 37
2021 36
2022 27
2023 18
2024 43
2025 26
Total 435
Download as CSV

Michael G. Dwyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael G. Dwyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 388–397 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 393 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54 393
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael G. Dwyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael G. Dwyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael G. Dwyer is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a strong emphasis on pathology, radiology, and neurology.

The main fields of study in Dwyer's work include:

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Neurology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Rheumatology

The scientist's research topics cover a range of neurological and imaging studies, notably:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Michael G. Dwyer has contributed to at least five recent papers, which illustrate a focus on neurological disorders and cardiovascular interventions. These publications are:

  • "Neurofilament levels are associated with blood-brain barrier integrity, lymphocyte extravasation, and risk factors following the first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis," 2020, Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • "Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement," 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • "Deep grey matter injury in multiple sclerosis: a NAIMS consensus statement," 2021, Brain
  • "A randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH cerebral embolic protection device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic LEsions after TransCatheter Aortic Valve ImplanTation: the REFLECT I trial," 2021, European Heart Journal
  • "Association of Choroid Plexus Inflammation on MRI With Clinical Disability Progression Over 5 Years in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis," 2022, Neurology

The research collaborations that Michael G. Dwyer frequently engages in include work with the following co-authors:

  • Robert Zivadinov
  • Niels Bergsland
  • Dejan Jakimovski
  • Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
  • Ralph H. B. Benedict

Regarding publication venues, Dwyer commonly publishes in journals and proceedings such as:

  • Neurology
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Journal of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Protection Against Cerebral Embolism During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Samir R. Kapadia;Susheel Kodali;Raj Makkar;Roxana Mehran

  • Effect of a Cerebral Protection Device on Brain Lesions Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CLEAN-TAVI Randomized Clinical Trial

    Stephan Haussig;Norman Mangner;Michael G. Dwyer;Lukas Lehmkuhl

  • Neocortical Atrophy, Third Ventricular Width, and Cognitive Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis

    Ralph H. B. Benedict;Jared M. Bruce;Michael G. Dwyer;Nadir Abdelrahman

  • Basal ganglia, thalamus and neocortical atrophy predicting slowed cognitive processing in multiple sclerosis

    Sonia Batista;Robert Zivadinov;Marietta Hoogs;Niels Bergsland

  • Mechanisms of action of disease-modifying agents and brain volume changes in multiple sclerosis

    R. Zivadinov;A. T. Reder;M. Filippi;A. Minagar

  • Prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in MS

    R. Zivadinov;K. Marr;G. Cutter;M. Ramanathan

  • Abnormal subcortical deep-gray matter susceptibility-weighted imaging filtered phase measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis: A case-control study

    Robert Zivadinov;Mari Heininen-Brown;Claudiu V. Schirda;Guy U. Poloni

  • Thalamic atrophy is associated with development of clinically definite multiple sclerosis

    Robert Zivadinov;Eva Havrdová;Niels Bergsland;Michaela Tyblova

  • Smoking is associated with increased lesion volumes and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis

    R. Zivadinov;B. Weinstock-Guttman;K. Hashmi;N. Abdelrahman

  • Subcortical and Cortical Gray Matter Atrophy in a Large Sample of Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndrome and Early Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

    N. Bergsland;D. Horakova;M. G. Dwyer;O. Dolezal

  • Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with increased lesion burden and brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis

    Natalie Kappus;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman;Jesper Hagemeier;Cheryl Kennedy

  • Extent of cerebellum, subcortical and cortical atrophy in patients with MS: a case-control study.

    Deepa Preeti Ramasamy;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Jennifer L. Cox;David Fritz

  • Clinical relevance of brain atrophy assessment in multiple sclerosis. Implications for its use in a clinical routine

    Robert Zivadinov;Dejan Jakimovski;Sirin Gandhi;Rahil Ahmed

  • The severity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis is related to altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics.

    Paolo Zamboni;Erica Menegatti;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman;Claudiu V. Schirda

  • Relationship of optic nerve and brain conventional and non-conventional MRI measures and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, as assessed by OCT and GDx: A pilot study

    Elliot M. Frohman;Michael G. Dwyer;Teresa Frohman;Jennifer L. Cox

  • Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative

    Alexandra J. Lansky;Alexandra J. Lansky;Steven R. Messé;Adam M. Brickman;Michael Dwyer

  • Localized atrophy of the thalamus and slowed cognitive processing speed in MS patients

    Niels Bergsland;Robert Zivadinov;Michael G. Dwyer;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman

  • Independent contributions of cortical gray matter atrophy and ventricle enlargement for predicting neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis

    Ayda Tekok-Kilic;Ralph H.B. Benedict;Bianca Weinstock-Guttman;Michael G. Dwyer

  • Clinical significance of atrophy and white matter mean diffusivity within the thalamus of multiple sclerosis patients

    Ralph H B Benedict;Hanneke E. Hulst;Niels Bergsland;Menno M. Schoonheim

  • Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and iron deposition on susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot case-control study.

    R Zivadinov;C Schirda;M G Dwyer;M E Haacke

  • Validity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting and Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) Sorting Tests in multiple sclerosis

    Brett A Parmenter;Robert Zivadinov;Laura Kerenyi;Rebecca Gavett

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Zivadinov
Robert Zivadinov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Niels Bergsland
Niels Bergsland University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Ralph H.B. Benedict
Ralph H.B. Benedict University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Eva Havrdova
Eva Havrdova Charles University
Axel Linke
Axel Linke TU Dresden
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
Samir R. Kapadia
Samir R. Kapadia Cleveland Clinic
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University
Jan Petter Larsen
Jan Petter Larsen University of Stavanger

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a range of exciting careers in research, healthcare, and mental health services. For students interested in expanding their expertise or changing career direction, there are several online psyd clinical psychology programs available. These programs are ideal for those wanting to practice as licensed clinical psychologists or work in related fields, combining neuroscience foundations with clinical skills.

Another option is pursuing an online masters mft degree. This pathway focuses on marriage and family therapy, a growing profession for graduates interested in supporting mental wellness across diverse populations.

Time-conscious students may benefit from accelerated degrees online, allowing them to fast-track their entry into neuroscience or related fields. Additionally, it's important to consider potential earnings; some neuroscience-related bachelor's qualifications rank among the highest paying degrees in the world.

Online learning options offer flexibility and diverse career paths for neuroscience students, whether seeking clinical work, advanced research, or high-earning opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Michael G. Dwyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles