World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 46 6721 6527 213 212 235 11768

Dana Kulic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dana Kulic between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dana Kulic published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2025. 61 of the 332 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2025. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 37 publications
2003 2025

332 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dana Kulic: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 2
2006 4
2007 7
2008 10
2009 10
2010 9
2011 8
2012 10
2013 19
2014 12
2015 11
2016 28
2017 16
2018 15
2019 15
2020 21
2021 27
2022 23
2023 22
2024 24
2025 37
Total 332
Download as CSV

Dana Kulic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Kulic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 235 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 235
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Dana Kulic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Kulic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 46
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dana Kulic is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia, contributing extensively to the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their body of work spans various specialized areas including Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their research interests are reflected in key topics such as:

  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition

Kulic has published prolifically, with a notable number of papers appearing in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, SSRN Electronic Journal, and IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

Recent significant publications include:

  • Robotic Vision for Human-Robot Interaction and Collaboration: A Survey and Systematic Review, 2022, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • High-Resolution Motor State Detection in Parkinson's Disease Using Convolutional Neural Networks, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Lower Body Kinematics Estimation from Wearable Sensors for Walking and Running: A Deep Learning Approach, 2020, Gait & Posture
  • Memory-based Deep Reinforcement Learning for POMDPs, 2021, 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
  • Haptics in Teleoperated Medical Interventions: Force Measurement, Haptic Interfaces and Their Influence on User's Performance, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

The researcher collaborates frequently with other scholars, including Elizabeth A. Croft, Akansel Cosgun, Leimin Tian, Pamela Carreno-Medrano, and Lingheng Meng. These collaborations indicate a networked approach to advancing robotics, human-robot interaction, and related technologies.

Overall, Dana Kulic's publication record demonstrates a strong focus on combining theoretical and applied research in artificial intelligence and robotics, with an emphasis on enhancing human-robot collaboration, reinforcement learning techniques, and applications in biomedical and rehabilitation contexts.

Best Publications

  • Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots

    Christoph Bartneck;Dana Kulic;Elizabeth A. Croft;Susana Zoghbi

  • Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for parkinson’s disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks

    Terry T. Um;Franz M. J. Pfister;Daniel Pichler;Satoshi Endo

  • Incremental learning of full body motion primitives and their sequencing through human motion observation

    Dana Kulić;Christian Ott;Dongheui Lee;Junichi Ishikawa

  • Affective State Estimation for Human–Robot Interaction

    Dana Kulic;Elizabeth A. Croft

  • Incremental Learning, Clustering and Hierarchy Formation of Whole Body Motion Patterns using Adaptive Hidden Markov Chains

    Dana Kulić;Wataru Takano;Yoshihiko Nakamura

  • Pre-collision safety strategies for human-robot interaction

    Dana Kulić;Elizabeth Croft

  • Body Movements for Affective Expression: A Survey of Automatic Recognition and Generation

    Michelle Karg;Ali-Akbar Samadani;Rob Gorbet;Kolja Kuhnlenz

  • Safe planning for human-robot interaction

    Dana Kulić;Elizabeth A. Croft

  • Real-time safety for human–robot interaction☆

    Dana Kulić;Elizabeth A. Croft

  • Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots

    Christoph Bartneck;Dana Kulic;Elizabeth Croft

  • Stable Gaussian process based tracking control of Euler–Lagrange systems

    Thomas Beckers;Dana Kulić;Sandra Hirche

  • Decentralized Multi-Agent Pursuit using Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Cristino de Souza;Rhys Newbury;Akansel Cosgun;Pedro Castillo

  • Online Segmentation and Clustering From Continuous Observation of Whole Body Motions

    D. Kulic;W. Takano;Y. Nakamura

  • Online Segmentation of Human Motion for Automated Rehabilitation Exercise Analysis

    Jonathan Feng-Shun Lin;Dana Kulic

  • Human pose recovery using wireless inertial measurement units.

    Jonathan F S Lin;Dana Kulić

  • Object Handovers: A Review for Robotics

    Valerio Ortenzi;Akansel Cosgun;Tommaso Pardi;Wesley P. Chan

  • Anxiety detection during human-robot interaction

    D. Kulic;E. Croft

  • Movement Primitive Segmentation for Human Motion Modeling: A Framework for Analysis

    Jonathan Feng-Shun Lin;Michelle Karg;Dana Kulic

  • Physiological and subjective responses to articulated robot motion

    Dana Kulić;Elizabeth Croft

  • Exercise motion classification from large-scale wearable sensor data using convolutional neural networks

    Terry Taewoong Um;Vahid Babakeshizadeh;Dana Kulic

  • An evaluation of classifier-specific filter measure performance for feature selection

    Cecille Freeman;Dana Kulić;Otman Basir

  • 2016 International Symposium on Experimental Robotics

    Dana Kulic;Yoshihiko Nakamura;Oussama Khatib;Gentiane Venture

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth A. Croft
Elizabeth A. Croft Monash University
Yoshihiko Nakamura
Yoshihiko Nakamura Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Sandra Hirche
Sandra Hirche Technical University of Munich
Stephen L. Smith
Stephen L. Smith University of Guelph
Jesse Hoey
Jesse Hoey University of Waterloo
Dongheui Lee
Dongheui Lee Technical University of Munich
Michael Mintrom
Michael Mintrom Monash University
Raphaël Dumas
Raphaël Dumas Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Otman A. Basir
Otman A. Basir University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and specialized career pathways. Many students start with the cheapest bachelor's degree online to build a solid foundation without excessive student debt. These affordable options provide flexible learning while covering essential computer science concepts.

For those interested in engineering fields, consider exploring online engineering degree programs. These programs combine technical expertise with problem-solving skills and can lead to diverse roles in technology and development.

Ambitious professionals aiming for leadership may pursue an online emba. This advanced degree helps tech specialists transition into management positions, blending technical and business knowledge for senior roles.

Additionally, tech-savvy students interested in data organization can earn a master library science online. This path is ideal for those combining computer science with archival or information science careers.

As the demand for digital skills grows, combining computer science with related online degrees can unlock exciting and lucrative career opportunities across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Dana Kulic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles