World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
8726
World Ranking
7537
National Ranking
303

Jesse Hoey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Hoey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jesse Hoey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jesse Hoey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jesse Hoey is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada and has an extensive publication record in social sciences and computer science, with a focus on artificial intelligence and social robot interaction.

Their main research fields include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Computer Science

Key subfields of study are:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Jesse Hoey's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The scientist's recent papers provide insight into their research areas, including:

  • Social Robots for the Care of Persons with Dementia, 2021, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • User perspectives on emotionally aligned social robots for older adults and persons living with dementia, 2022, Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering
  • A survey of the impact of self-supervised pretraining for diagnostic tasks in medical X-ray, CT, MRI, and ultrasound, 2024, BMC Medical Imaging
  • Operationalizing the Relation Between Affect and Cognition With the Somatic Transform, 2021, Emotion Review
  • User Perception of Smart Home Surveillance Among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: Scoping Review, 2023, JMIR mhealth and uhealth

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jesse Hoey include:

  • Blake VanBerlo
  • Tobias Schröder
  • Kyle Tilbury
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn
  • Alexander Wong

The scientist regularly publishes in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering
  • American Behavioral Scientist
  • 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG)

Best Publications

  • Sensor-Based Activity Recognition

    Liming Chen;J. Hoey;C. D. Nugent;D. J. Cook

  • SPUDD: stochastic planning using decision diagrams

    Jesse Hoey;Robert St-Aubin;Alan Hu;Craig Boutilier

  • The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: An efficacy study

    Alex Mihailidis;Alex Mihailidis;Jennifer N Boger;Jennifer N Boger;Tammy Craig;Jesse Hoey

  • An analytic solution to discrete Bayesian reinforcement learning

    Pascal Poupart;Nikos Vlassis;Jesse Hoey;Kevin Regan

  • Automated handwashing assistance for persons with dementia using video and a partially observable Markov decision process

    Jesse Hoey;Pascal Poupart;Axel von Bertoldi;Tammy Craig

  • Body Movements for Affective Expression: A Survey of Automatic Recognition and Generation

    Michelle Karg;Ali-Akbar Samadani;Rob Gorbet;Kolja Kuhnlenz

  • A planning system based on Markov decision processes to guide people with dementia through activities of daily living

    J. Boger;J. Hoey;P. Poupart;C. Boutilier

  • A decision-theoretic approach to task assistance for persons with dementia

    Jennifer Boger;Pascal Poupart;Jesse Hoey;Craig Boutilier

  • From individual to group-level emotion recognition: EmotiW 5.0

    Abhinav Dhall;Roland Goecke;Shreya Ghosh;Jyoti Joshi

  • Review of fall detection techniques: a data availability perspective

    Shehroz S. Khan;Jesse Hoey

  • Affective Neural Response Generation

    Nabiha Asghar;Pascal Poupart;Jesse Hoey;Xin Jiang

  • Technology and Dementia: The Future is Now.

    Arlene J Astell;Nicole Bouranis;Jesse Hoey;Allison Lindauer

  • Assisting persons with dementia during handwashing using a partially observable Markov decision process.

    Jesse Hoey;Axel von Bertoldi;Pascal Poupart;Alex Mihailidis

  • APRICODD: Approximate Policy Construction Using Decision Diagrams

    Robert St-Aubin;Jesse Hoey;Craig Boutilier

  • Ambient kitchen: designing situated services using a high fidelity prototyping environment

    Patrick Olivier;Guangyou Xu;Andrew Monk;Jesse Hoey

  • EmotiW 2016: video and group-level emotion recognition challenges

    Abhinav Dhall;Roland Goecke;Jyoti Joshi;Jesse Hoey

  • Solving POMDPs with continuous or large discrete observation spaces

    Jesse Hoey;Pascal Poupart

  • Information and communication technology solutions for outdoor navigation in dementia.

    Stefan Teipel;Stefan Teipel;Claudio Babiloni;Jesse Hoey;Jeffrey Kaye

  • The Ethics of Emotion in Artificial Intelligence Systems

    Luke Stark;Jesse Hoey

  • Rapid specification and automated generation of prompting systems to assist people with dementia

    Jesse Hoey;Thomas Plötz;Dan Jackson;Andrew Monk

  • Modeling Dynamic Identities and Uncertainty in Social Interactions Bayesian Affect Control Theory

    Tobias Schröder;Jesse Hoey;Kimberly B. Rogers

  • Activity Recognition in Pervasive Intelligent Environments

    Liming Chen;Chris D. Nugent;Jit Biswas;Jesse Hoey

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Mihailidis
Alex Mihailidis University of Toronto
Pascal Poupart
Pascal Poupart University of Waterloo
James J. Little
James J. Little University of British Columbia
Craig Boutilier
Craig Boutilier Google (United States)
Dana Kulic
Dana Kulic Monash University
Patrick Olivier
Patrick Olivier Monash University
Chris D. Nugent
Chris D. Nugent University of Ulster
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York
Stephen J. McKenna
Stephen J. McKenna University of Dundee
Meiyappan Nagappan
Meiyappan Nagappan University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science opens up flexible, affordable, and accessible options, especially for international students. Many learners seek cheapest online colleges to reduce education costs while maintaining a quality learning experience. This approach is ideal for those balancing work, family, or other responsibilities.

If your undergraduate GPA isn’t as high as you’d like, don’t worry—there are accredited online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa. These programs provide excellent opportunities to advance your education and career, even if you had academic challenges in the past.

Graduates in Computer Science can pursue a broad range of fields. To get an idea of the types of career options available with a technical degree, it’s helpful to explore resources such as what can i do with an environmental science degree. These pathways often overlap in areas like data analytics, sustainability, and research.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, consider enrolling in one of the fastest computer science degree programs available online. These accelerated tracks provide a rapid route to earning your degree without sacrificing educational standards.

Best Scientists Citing Jesse Hoey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles