World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Olivier

Patrick Olivier

Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
14549
World Ranking
2775
National Ranking
79

Patrick Olivier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Olivier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 458 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick Olivier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Olivier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Patrick Olivier is affiliated with Monash University in Australia, where their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields related to health, technology, and social sciences. Their work predominantly falls within the domain of Medicine, with a strong focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, and Information Systems.

Olivier's research incorporates key topics including Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, ICT in Developing Communities, Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin, Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development, Child Development and Digital Technology, and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research.

Their publications have appeared frequently in several venues, notably:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Designing Interactive Systems Conference
  • Médecine Nucléaire
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Patrick Olivier include:

  • "Day and night light exposure are associated with psychiatric disorders: an objective light study in >85,000 people" (2023) - Nature Mental Health
  • "Experimental study and in-situ FBG monitoring of process-induced strains during autoclave co-curing, co-bonding and secondary bonding of composite laminates" (2020) - Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing
  • "Objective assessment of sleep regularity in 60 000 UK Biobank participants using an open-source package" (2021) - SLEEP
  • "Integrating Health Technologies in Health Services for Syrian Refugees in Lebanon: Qualitative Study" (2020) - Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Brighter nights and darker days predict higher mortality risk: A prospective analysis of personal light exposure in >88,000 individuals" (2024) - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of Olivier's work, partnering frequently with other researchers such as Ling Wu, Joshua Paolo Seguin, Delvin Varghese, Tom Bartindale, and Marie B. H. Yap, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson’s disease

    Brook Galna;Gillian Barry;Daniel Jackson;Dadirayi Mhiripiri

  • Digits: freehand 3D interactions anywhere using a wrist-worn gloveless sensor

    David Kim;Otmar Hilliges;Shahram Izadi;Alex D. Butler

  • An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research

    John Vines;Gary Pritchard;Peter Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design

    John Vines;Rachel Clarke;Peter Wright;John McCarthy

  • Feature learning for activity recognition in ubiquitous computing

    Thomas Plötz;Nils Y. Hammerla;Patrick Olivier

  • Engaging older people using participatory design

    Stephen Lindsay;Daniel Jackson;Guy Schofield;Patrick Olivier

  • Multi-Touch Surfaces: A Technical Guide

    J Schöning;P Brandl;F Daiber;F Echtler

  • The mobile fitness coach: Towards individualized skill assessment using personalized mobile devices

    Matthias Kranz;Andreas MöLler;Nils Hammerla;Stefan Diewald

  • Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia

    Stephen Lindsay;Katie Brittain;Daniel Jackson;Cassim Ladha

  • Camera Control in Computer Graphics

    Marc Christie;Patrick Olivier;Jean Marie Normand

  • Making design probes work

    Jayne Wallace;John McCarthy;Peter C. Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • "We've bin watching you": designing for reflection and social persuasion to promote sustainable lifestyles

    Anja Thieme;Rob Comber;Julia Miebach;Jack Weeden

  • Retraining function in people with Parkinson’s disease using the Microsoft kinect: game design and pilot testing

    Brook Galna;Daniel Jackson;Guy Schofield;Roisin McNaney

  • Multi-touch authentication on tabletops

    David Kim;Paul Dunphy;Pam Briggs;Jonathan Hook

  • A design-led inquiry into personhood in dementia

    Jayne Wallace;Peter C. Wright;John McCarthy;David Philip Green

  • Syrian Refugees and Digital Health in Lebanon: Opportunities for Improving Antenatal Health

    Reem Talhouk;Sandra Mesmar;Anja Thieme;Madeline Balaam

  • Ambient kitchen: designing situated services using a high fidelity prototyping environment

    Patrick Olivier;Guangyou Xu;Andrew Monk;Jesse Hoey

  • Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings

    John Vines;Mark Blythe;Stephen Lindsay;Paul Dunphy

  • Digital Civics: Citizen Empowerment With and Through Technology

    Vasillis Vlachokyriakos;Clara Crivellaro;Christopher A. Le Dantec;Eric Gordon

  • Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers

    Nick Taylor;Keith Cheverst;Peter Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • Viewpoint: empowering communities with situated voting devices

    Nick Taylor;Justin Marshall;Alicia Blum-Ross;John Mills

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Wright
Peter Wright Newcastle University
John Vines
John Vines Northumbria University
Thomas Plötz
Thomas Plötz Georgia Institute of Technology
Antonio Krüger
Antonio Krüger German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Mark Blythe
Mark Blythe Northumbria University
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York
Andreas Butz
Andreas Butz Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Johannes Schöning
Johannes Schöning University of St. Gallen
Peter Robinson
Peter Robinson University of Cambridge
Paul Seedhouse
Paul Seedhouse Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to flexible learning and diverse career paths. Many students begin their journey with an best associate degree in 6 months online, offering a fast track to foundational computing skills and entry-level opportunities.

If cost is a concern, pursuing the cheapest bachelor degree online can make an accredited computer science education more accessible. These programs are often flexible and designed for both new and returning students.

Computer Science is also highly relevant to fields like business and engineering. Students interested in blending technical and managerial skills may consider the best online business degree. This can prepare graduates for roles in tech management, entrepreneurship, or IT consulting.

For those with a passion for building and innovation, it’s worth asking, can you get an engineering degree online? Increasingly, the answer is yes, with online engineering programs offering specialized tracks in areas like software, electrical, or systems engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Olivier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles