World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 71 728 634 139 123 442 20871
Computer Science 63 2739 2657 158 156 314 17401

Peter Wright publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Wright between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Wright published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2015. 5 of the 540 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2015. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1969 2025

540 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Wright: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 1
1980 2
1981 0
1982 1
1983 3
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 3
1990 3
1991 10
1992 5
1993 5
1994 8
1995 8
1996 7
1997 15
1998 9
1999 10
2000 10
2001 13
2002 10
2003 7
2004 24
2005 28
2006 16
2007 26
2008 10
2009 15
2010 29
2011 34
2012 24
2013 29
2014 19
2015 36
2016 21
2017 27
2018 18
2019 16
2020 10
2021 3
2022 4
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 540
Download as CSV

Peter Wright publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wright sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 434–443 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 442 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29 442
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Wright D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wright sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40 71
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Wright is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within Social Sciences and Medicine. Within these domains, Wright has contributed significantly to subfields such as Education, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, and Human Factors and Ergonomics.

Themes in Wright's research include various main topics such as Child Development and Digital Technology, Creativity in Education and Neuroscience, Art Education and Development, Music Therapy and Health, Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, and Surgical Simulation and Training.

Wright's recent publications showcase a range of interdisciplinary work. Notable papers include:

  • Your Move: An Open Access Dataset of Over 1500 Board Gamer's Demographics, Preferences and Motivations (2023), published in Simulation & Gaming
  • Learning, making and flourishing in non-formal spaces: Participatory arts and social justice (2020), published in Education Citizenship and Social Justice
  • SenseMyStreet: Sensor Commissioning Toolkit for Communities (2022), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Disability Justice: The Challenges of Inclusion in Everyday Life (2025), published in International Journal of Disability Development and Education
  • "Are there Racists in Yugoslavia?" Debating Racism and Anti-blackness in Socialist Yugoslavia (2022), published in Slavic Review

Wright has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Their frequent coauthors include Sian Chapman, Carrie Ekins, Dean Owens, Barry Down, and Christina Davies, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Books form part of Wright's academic output, with a publication titled Youth Participatory Arts, Learning and Social Transformation: Engaging People, Place and Context With Big Hart released in 2021 under Murdoch University.

The venues Wright regularly publishes in reflect a diverse interest and engagement across interdisciplinary fields. Frequent venues include Open Journal of Pediatrics, Simulation & Gaming, Education Citizenship and Social Justice, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, and International Journal of Disability Development and Education.

Best Publications

  • Technology as Experience

    John McCarthy;Peter Wright

  • High Levels of Circulating Epinephrine Trigger Apical Cardiodepression in a β2-Adrenergic Receptor/Gi–Dependent Manner A New Model of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

    Helen Paur;Peter T. Wright;Markus B. Sikkel;Matthew H. Tranter

  • Funology: from usability to enjoyment

    Mark A. Blythe;Kees Overbeeke;Andrew F. Monk;Peter C. Wright

  • Communities of practice in the distributed international environment

    Paul Hildreth;Chris Kimble;Peter C. Wright

  • Empathy and experience in HCI

    Peter Wright;John McCarthy

  • An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research

    John Vines;Gary Pritchard;Peter Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design

    John Vines;Rachel Clarke;Peter Wright;John McCarthy

  • An evaluation of earcons for use in auditory human-computer interfaces

    Stephen A. Brewster;Peter C. Wright;Alistair D. N. Edwards

  • Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue

    Peter Wright;John McCarthy

  • Aesthetics and experience-centered design

    Peter Wright;Jayne Wallace;John McCarthy

  • Analyzing human-computer interaction as distributed cognition: the resources model

    Peter C. Wright;Robert E. Fields;Michael D. Harrison

  • Making sense of experience

    Peter Wright;John McCarthy;Lisa Meekison

  • Live-streaming changes the (video) game

    Thomas Smith;Marianna Obrist;Peter Wright

  • Communities of practice: going virtual

    Chris Kimble;Paul Hildreth;Peter Wright

  • The experience of enchantment in human–computer interaction

    John McCarthy;Peter Wright;Jayne Wallace;Andy Dearden

  • Making design probes work

    Jayne Wallace;John McCarthy;Peter C. Wright;Patrick Olivier

  • A Detailed Investigation into the Effectiveness of Earcons

    Stephen A. Brewster;Peter C. Wright;Alistair D. N. Edwards

  • The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality

    William Gaver;Mark Blythe;Andy Boucher;Nadine Jarvis

  • Experimentally Derived Guidelines for the Creation of Earcons

    Stephen A. Brewster;Peter C. Wright;Alistair D. N. Edwards

  • Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction

    Mark Blythe;Kristina Andersen;Rachel Clarke;Peter Wright

  • Pathophysiology of takotsubo syndrome: temporal phases of cardiovascular responses to extreme stress.

    Peter T. Wright;Matthew H. Tranter;Andrew C. Morley-Smith;Alexander R. Lyon

  • An Age-Old Problem

    John Vines;Gary Pritchard;Peter Wright;Patrick Olivier

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Olivier
Patrick Olivier Monash University
Mark Blythe
Mark Blythe Northumbria University
John Vines
John Vines Northumbria University
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York
John Bowers
John Bowers Newcastle University
David Kirk
David Kirk Newcastle University
Stephen Brewster
Stephen Brewster University of Glasgow
Ian Sinclair
Ian Sinclair University of Southampton
S.M. Spearing
S.M. Spearing University of Southampton
Ronald T. Brown
Ronald T. Brown University of Nevada, Las Vegas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Online education has made it even easier to pursue these goals, offering both flexibility and affordability for students from all backgrounds. Many institutions now provide affordable msw programs online for those seeking to become licensed social workers. For students aspiring to work with individuals with behavioral challenges, pursuing bcba certification programs can be a strong step toward becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

If you’re aiming to fast-track your education, consider enrolling in an accelerated social work degree or exploring an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology program. These options allow you to gain credentials more quickly and enter the workforce sooner. Whether your interests lie in psychology, social work, or behavioral analysis, these online pathways can help you achieve your career goals both efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles