World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
43
Citations
11564
World Ranking
6015
National Ranking
1669

Phoebe Sengers publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phoebe Sengers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 97 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Phoebe Sengers D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phoebe Sengers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phoebe Sengers is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and is active in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans multiple subfields including Safety Research, Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their recent publications cover a range of interdisciplinary topics. Notable papers include:

  • "Making data science systems work" (2020), Big Data & Society
  • "Big Tech Meets Big Ag: Diversifying Epistemologies of Data and Power" (2022), Science as Culture
  • "Legibility and the Legacy of Racialized Dispossession in Digital Agriculture" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Speculation and the Design of Development" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "Seamless Visions, Seamful Realities: Anticipating Rural Infrastructural Fragility in Early Design of Digital Agriculture" (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Their frequent publication venues, reflecting a focus on technology and societal impacts, include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Big Data & Society
  • Science as Culture

Phoebe Sengers collaborates regularly with a number of coauthors. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Gloire Rubambiza
  • Hakim Weatherspoon
  • Jen Liu
  • Samir Passi
  • Imani Madison

Their research topics focus strongly on the intersections of technology, society, and ethics with an emphasis on:

  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • ICT in Developing Communities
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Agricultural Innovations and Practices

Best Publications

  • Reflective design

    Phoebe Sengers;Kirsten Boehner;Shay David;Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye

  • Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI

    Carl DiSalvo;Phoebe Sengers;Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir

  • Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation

    Phoebe Sengers;Bill Gaver

  • The Three Paradigms of HCI

    Steve Harrison;Phoebe Sengers

  • How HCI interprets the probes

    Kirsten Boehner;Janet Vertesi;Phoebe Sengers;Paul Dourish

  • Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies

    Genevieve Bell;Mark Blythe;Phoebe Sengers

  • Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability

    Hronn Brynjarsdottir;Maria Håkansson;James Pierce;Eric Baumer

  • How emotion is made and measured

    Kirsten Boehner;Rogério DePaula;Paul Dourish;Phoebe Sengers

  • Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight

    Stephen Purpura;Victoria Schwanda;Kaiton Williams;William Stubler

  • Affect: from information to interaction

    Kirsten Boehner;Rogério DePaula;Paul Dourish;Phoebe Sengers

  • Autobiographical design in HCI research: designing and learning through use-it-yourself

    Carman Neustaedter;Phoebe Sengers

  • Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art

    Kristina Höök;Phoebe Sengers;Gerd Andersson

  • Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science

    Steve Harrison;Phoebe Sengers;Deborah Tatar

  • Environmental sustainability and interaction

    Jennifer C. Mankoff;Eli Blevis;Alan Borning;Batya Friedman

  • In-car gps navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment

    Gilly Leshed;Theresa Velden;Oya Rieger;Blazej Kot

  • Design Within a Patriarchal Society: Opportunities and Challenges in Designing for Rural Women in Bangladesh

    Sharifa Sultana;François Guimbretière;Phoebe Sengers;Nicola Dell

  • Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI

    James Pierce;Yolande Strengers;Phoebe Sengers;Susanne Bødker

  • Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI

    James Pierce;Phoebe Sengers;Tad Hirsch;Tom Jenkins

  • Reflective HCI: towards a critical technical practice

    Paul Dourish;Janet Finlay;Phoebe Sengers;Peter Wright

  • "I lie to myself that i have freedom in my own schedule": productivity tools and experiences of busyness

    Gilly Leshed;Phoebe Sengers

  • Enhancing ubiquitous computing with user interpretation: field testing the home health horoscope

    William Gaver;Phoebe Sengers;Tobie Kerridge;Joseph Kaye

  • Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT

    Maria Håkansson;Phoebe Sengers

  • Historical analysis: using the past to design the future

    Susan Wyche;Phoebe Sengers;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • Interfaces with the ineffable: Meeting aesthetic experience on its own terms

    Kirsten Boehner;Phoebe Sengers;Simeon Warner

  • The disenchantment of affect

    Phoebe Sengers;Kirsten Boehner;Michael Mateas

Frequent Co-Authors

Carl DiSalvo
Carl DiSalvo Georgia Institute of Technology
Paul Dourish
Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine
Michael Mateas
Michael Mateas University of California, Santa Cruz
William Gaver
William Gaver Northumbria University
Carman Neustaedter
Carman Neustaedter Simon Fraser University
Mark Blythe
Mark Blythe Northumbria University
Batya Friedman
Batya Friedman University of Washington
Allison Woodruff
Allison Woodruff Google (United States)
Kristina Höök
Kristina Höök Royal Institute of Technology
Peter Wright
Peter Wright Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to flexible, fast-paced learning and rewarding careers. Thanks to innovative online education platforms, students now have access to programs that fit all lifestyles, whether you're working, parenting, or seeking a quick career shift.

If you want to accelerate your education, consider a masters degree in 6 months. These condensed programs are designed for driven learners seeking to rapidly advance their credentials. Similarly, 6 week certification programs online allow aspiring professionals to gain critical job skills in a fraction of the time of traditional courses.

For those looking to boost their earning potential without committing to a full degree, certification programs are an ideal route. They focus on in-demand technical skills often sought by employers across engineering and tech sectors.

Online education is especially beneficial for non-traditional students and parents. Research shows the best online degrees for stay at home moms combine practical skills with scheduling flexibility—helping learners balance studies with family life and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Phoebe Sengers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles