World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7087
World Ranking
9280
National Ranking
573

Mark Blythe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Blythe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark Blythe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Blythe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Blythe is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom and specializes in computer science with a focus on human-computer interaction. Their research explores several intersecting areas including innovative human-technology interaction, aging and gerontology research, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, health disparities and outcomes, interactive and immersive displays, context-aware activity recognition systems, and environmental education and sustainability.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a variety of topics within these fields. Blythe authored "Designs on Transcendence: Sketches of a TX machine" published in 2021 in Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction. Other recent papers connected to Blythe's research network and interests include "Flourishing 'older-old' (80+) adults: Personal projects and their enabling places" (2022, Wellbeing Space and Society), "Splash! Identifying the Grand Challenges for WaterHCI" (2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts), "Social networking sites as platforms to persuade behaviour change in domestic energy consumption" (2023, Lincoln Repository [University of Lincoln]), and "Space for Debate: Pop Design" (2020, Northumbria Research Link [Northumbria University]).

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Blythe or operating in the same research milieu include Elizabeth Buie, Jenny Roe, Caroline Oliver, Alice Roe, and Christal Clashing. These collaborations contribute to a multidisciplinary approach across psychology, health, and technology interfaces.

The main publication venues associated with Blythe's work demonstrate a focus on human-computer interaction and related interdisciplinary fields. These venues include Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction, Wellbeing Space and Society, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln), and Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).

The scientist's work spans several subfields, such as human-computer interaction, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, social psychology, health, and computer vision and pattern recognition, indicating a broad engagement with both technical and psychological aspects of technology use.

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability

  • Designs on Transcendence: Sketches of a TX machine, 2021, Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction
  • Flourishing 'older-old' (80+) adults: Personal projects and their enabling places, 2022, Wellbeing Space and Society
  • Splash! Identifying the Grand Challenges for WaterHCI, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • Social networking sites as platforms to persuade behaviour change in domestic energy consumption, 2023, Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln)
  • Space for Debate: Pop Design, 2020, Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)

  • Elizabeth Buie
  • Jenny Roe
  • Caroline Oliver
  • Alice Roe
  • Christal Clashing

  • Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction
  • Wellbeing Space and Society
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Health
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Best Publications

  • Funology: from usability to enjoyment

    Mark A. Blythe;Kees Overbeeke;Andrew F. Monk;Peter C. Wright

  • Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies

    Genevieve Bell;Mark Blythe;Phoebe Sengers

  • Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts

    Mark Blythe

  • The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality

    William Gaver;Mark Blythe;Andy Boucher;Nadine Jarvis

  • Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction

    Mark Blythe;Kristina Andersen;Rachel Clarke;Peter Wright

  • Funology: designing enjoyment

    Andrew Monk;Marc Hassenzahl;Mark Blythe;Darren Reed

  • Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design

    Mark A. Blythe;Peter C. Wright

  • Wattsup?: motivating reductions in domestic energy consumption using social networks

    Derek Foster;Shaun Lawson;Mark Blythe;Paul Cairns

  • Socially dependable design: The challenge of ageing populations for HCI

    Mark A. Blythe;Andrew F. Monk;Kevin Doughty

  • Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings

    John Vines;Mark Blythe;Stephen Lindsay;Paul Dunphy

  • The semantics of fun: differentiating enjoyable experiences

    Mark Blythe;Marc Hassenzahl

  • Why are mobile phones annoying

    Andrew Monk;Jenni Carroll;Sarah Parker;Mark Blythe

  • Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures

    Conor Linehan;Ben J. Kirman;Stuart Reeves;Mark A. Blythe

  • Technology biographies: field study techinques for home use product development

    Mark Blythe;Andrew Monk;Jisoo Park

  • Grounding experience: relating theory and method to evaluate the user experience of smartphones

    David Swallow;Mark Blythe;Peter Wright

  • Towards a UX manifesto

    Effie Lai-Chong Law;Arnold P. O. S. Vermeeren;Marc Hassenzahl;Mark Blythe

  • Spirituality: there's an app for that! (but not a lot of research)

    Elizabeth Buie;Mark Blythe

  • F for fake: four studies on how we fall for phish

    Mark Blythe;Helen Petrie;John A. Clark

  • Research Fiction: Storytelling, Plot and Design

    Mark Blythe

  • Critical methods and user generated content: the iPhone on YouTube

    Mark Blythe;Paul Cairns

  • User experience and the idea of design in HCI

    Peter Wright;Mark Blythe;John McCarthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Wright
Peter Wright Newcastle University
Andrew Monk
Andrew Monk University of York
Patrick Olivier
Patrick Olivier Monash University
Marc Hassenzahl
Marc Hassenzahl University of Siegen
John Vines
John Vines Northumbria University
John Bowers
John Bowers Newcastle University
Paul Cairns
Paul Cairns University of York
William Gaver
William Gaver Northumbria University
Shaowen Bardzell
Shaowen Bardzell Georgia Institute of Technology
Jeffrey Bardzell
Jeffrey Bardzell Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways in science, technology, engineering, and data-related fields. Many students interested in computer science also consider affordable, flexible online programs to supplement their expertise or discover new passions.

For those drawn to the intersection of technology and the environment, a cheapest online environmental science degree offers an option to study environmental impact alongside computational methods. Alternatively, if you’re fascinated by applied sciences, earning online mechanical engineering degrees can develop your skills for industries such as manufacturing and robotics.

Students intrigued by the foundations of computation and the universe may want to explore an online theoretical physics degree. For those looking to enter one of the fastest-growing fields, pursuing the cheapest data science masters in usa can provide a direct pathway to careers in analytics, artificial intelligence, and big data.

As technology evolves, combining computer science with related disciplines through online study can significantly expand your career opportunities and expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Blythe

Trending Scientists