World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
13752
World Ranking
2335
National Ranking
92

Vitali E. Fioletov publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vitali E. Fioletov sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 210 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Vitali E. Fioletov D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vitali E. Fioletov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Vitali E. Fioletov is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences with a substantial emphasis on Environmental Science. Their work extensively covers Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change as subfields, alongside contributions in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientific topics addressed by Fioletov include Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, Climate change and permafrost, and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics.

Fioletov has published in various journals, with frequent contributions to these publication venues:

  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Recent papers authored by or including Fioletov are:

  • Assessment of the quality of TROPOMI high-spatial-resolution NO 2 data products in the Greater Toronto Area, 2020, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Global Climate, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Global total ozone recovery trends attributed to ozone-depleting substance (ODS) changes derived from five merged ozone datasets, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Anthropogenic and volcanic point source SO 2 emissions derived from TROPOMI on board Sentinel-5 Precursor: first results, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Global Climate, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Fioletov include:

  • C. A. McLinden
  • Debora Griffin
  • Xiaoyi Zhao
  • Hanne H. Christiansen
  • N. A. Krotkov

Best Publications

  • Aura OMI observations of regional SO2 and NO2 pollution changes from 2005 to 2015

    Nickolay A. Krotkov;Chris A. McLinden;Can Li;Lok N. Lamsal

  • Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

    V. Eyring;N. Butchart;D. W. Waugh;H. Akiyoshi

  • A decade of global volcanic SO 2 emissions measured from space.

    S. A. Carn;V. E. Fioletov;C. A. McLinden;C. Li

  • The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space

    Pieternel F. Levelt;Joanna Joiner;Johanna Tamminen;J. Pepijn Veefkind

  • India Is Overtaking China as the World's Largest Emitter of Anthropogenic Sulfur Dioxide.

    Can Li;Can Li;Chris McLinden;Vitali Fioletov;Nickolay Krotkov

  • High resolution mapping of nitrogen dioxide with TROPOMI: First results and validation over the Canadian oil sands.

    Debora Griffin;Xiaoyi Zhao;Chris A. McLinden;Folkert Boersma;Folkert Boersma

  • Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000

    V. E. Fioletov;G. E. Bodeker;A. J. Miller;R. D. McPeters

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Satellite estimation of spectral surface UV irradiance in the presence of tropospheric aerosols. 1. Cloud-free case

    N. A. Krotkov;P. K. Bhartia;J. R. Herman;V. Fioletov

  • A global catalogue of large SO 2 sources and emissions derived from theOzone Monitoring Instrument

    Vitali E. Fioletov;Chris A. McLinden;Nickolay Krotkov;Can Li;Can Li

  • Lifetimes and emissions of SO2 from point sources estimated from OMI

    V. E. Fioletov;C. A. McLinden;N. Krotkov;C. Li;C. Li

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • Space-based detection of missing sulfur dioxide sources of global air pollution

    Chris A. McLinden;Vitali Fioletov;Mark W. Shephard;Nick Krotkov

  • Estimation of SO2 emissions using OMI retrievals

    V. E. Fioletov;C. A. McLinden;N. Krotkov;M. D. Moran

  • Validation of daily erythemal doses from Ozone Monitoring Instrument with ground‐based UV measurement data

    Aapo Tanskanen;Anders Lindfors;Anu Määttä;Nickolay Krotkov

  • Total ozone trends from 1979 to 2016 derived from five merged observational datasets - the emergence into ozone recovery

    Mark Weber;Melanie Coldewey-Egbers;Vitali E. Fioletov;Stacey M. Frith

  • Estimating the global ozone characteristics during the last 30 years

    Rumen D. Bojkov;Vitali E. Fioletov

  • The UV Index: Definition, Distribution and Factors Affecting It

    Vitali E. Fioletov;James B. Kerr;Angus Fergusson

  • NH 3 emissions from large point sources derived from CrIS and IASI satellite observations

    Enrico Dammers;Chris A. McLinden;Debora Griffin;Mark W. Shephard

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris A. McLinden
Chris A. McLinden Environment and Climate Change Canada
Nickolay A. Krotkov
Nickolay A. Krotkov Goddard Space Flight Center
Can Li
Can Li Goddard Space Flight Center
Diego Loyola
Diego Loyola German Aerospace Center
James B. Kerr
James B. Kerr Environment and Climate Change Canada
Irina Petropavlovskikh
Irina Petropavlovskikh Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Jay R. Herman
Jay R. Herman University of Maryland, Baltimore County
David W. Tarasick
David W. Tarasick Environment and Climate Change Canada
Joanna Joiner
Joanna Joiner Goddard Space Flight Center
Stacey M. Frith
Stacey M. Frith Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that intersect with public policy, social dynamics, and education. For those interested in administrative roles influencing environmental policy, pursuing the best online MPA programs can provide essential skills in public administration and management.

Understanding societal impact on the environment is crucial, and a bachelors degree in sociology online can complement environmental studies by offering insights into human behavior and social structures. This combination enhances one’s ability to design sustainable solutions.

For professionals aiming to advance in educational roles related to environmental awareness, online doctoral programs can be a valuable option. Many seek the online EdD no dissertation route, balancing rigorous academics with practical application without the lengthy dissertation process.

Exploring the best online EdS to EdD programs can also help educators specializing in environmental science to elevate their credentials while continuing to work, offering flexible pathways for career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Vitali E. Fioletov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles