World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
8637
World Ranking
6676
National Ranking
2384

Stacey M. Frith publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacey M. Frith sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 105 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stacey M. Frith D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stacey M. Frith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stacey M. Frith is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric sciences, with significant contributions to Earth and planetary sciences and environmental science. The main subfields of study include atmospheric science, global and planetary change, astronomy and astrophysics, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, as well as sociology and political science.

Their body of work extensively covers key topics such as atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, climate variability and models, hydrology and drought analysis, lightning and electromagnetic phenomena, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Recent publications by Stacey M. Frith include:

  • "Global Climate" (2020), published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Global total ozone recovery trends attributed to ozone-depleting substance (ODS) changes derived from five merged ozone datasets" (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Global Climate" (2021), published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Global Climate" (2022), published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60° S-60° N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model" (2022), published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Their frequent coauthors include Sean Davis, D. A. Degenstein, Carlo Arosio, Vitali Fioletov, and Melanie Coldewey-Egbers.

The venues where they most often publish are the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Geophysical Research Letters, and Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Best Publications

  • Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

    V. Eyring;N. Butchart;D. W. Waugh;H. Akiyoshi

  • Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

    V. Eyring;D. W. Waugh;G. E. Bodeker;Eugene C. Cordero

  • Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment

    S.-W. Son.;E. P. Gerber;J. Perlwitz;J. Perlwitz;L. M. Polvani

  • Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery

    William T. Ball;Justin Alsing;Justin Alsing;Daniel J. Mortlock;Daniel J. Mortlock;Johannes Staehelin

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • Chemistry-Climate Model Simulations of Twenty- First Century Stratospheric Climate and Circulation Changes

    Neal Butchart;I. Cionni;V. Eyring;T. G. Shepherd

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated

    Paul A. Newman;L. D. Oman;A. R. Douglass;E. L. Fleming

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • Evaluation of the Ozone Fields in NASA's MERRA-2 Reanalysis.

    Krzysztof Wargan;Gordon Labow;Stacey Frith;Steven Pawson

  • Detecting the recovery of total column ozone

    Gregory C. Reinsel;George C. Tiao;Charles H. Jackman

  • Trends in Global Tropospheric Ozone Inferred from a Composite Record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS Satellite Measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI Simulation

    Jerald R. Ziemke;Jerald R. Ziemke;Luke D. Oman;Sarah A. Strode;Sarah A. Strode;Anne R. Douglass

  • Goddard Earth Observing System chemistry‐climate model simulations of stratospheric ozone‐temperature coupling between 1950 and 2005

    Steven Pawson;Richard S. Stolarski;Anne R. Douglass;Paul A. Newman

  • Total ozone trends from 1979 to 2016 derived from five merged observational datasets - the emergence into ozone recovery

    Mark Weber;Melanie Coldewey-Egbers;Vitali E. Fioletov;Stacey M. Frith

  • Recent changes in total column ozone based on the SBUV Version 8.6 Merged Ozone Data Set

    S. M. Frith;N. A. Kramarova;R. S. Stolarski;R. D. McPeters

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • An update on ozone profile trends for the period 2000 to 2016

    Wolfgang Steinbrecht;Lucien Froidevaux;Ryan Fuller;Ray Wang

  • Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends

    Neil R. P Harris;B Hassler;B Hassler;F Tummon;G E Bodeker

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Irina Petropavlovskikh
Irina Petropavlovskikh Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Richard D. McPeters
Richard D. McPeters Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard S. Stolarski
Richard S. Stolarski Johns Hopkins University
Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Wolfgang Steinbrecht German Meteorological Service
Lucien Froidevaux
Lucien Froidevaux California Institute of Technology
Paul Newman
Paul Newman Goddard Space Flight Center
Vitali E. Fioletov
Vitali E. Fioletov Environment and Climate Change Canada
Greg Bodeker
Greg Bodeker Victoria University of Wellington
Kleareti Tourpali
Kleareti Tourpali Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Karen H. Rosenlof
Karen H. Rosenlof National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with fields like public administration, sociology, and education. For those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy or community planning, exploring the easiest online MPA programs can provide specialized skills in management and governance.

Additionally, understanding social dynamics is crucial to addressing environmental challenges. Pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs can enhance your grasp of human behavior and social systems, which complements scientific knowledge in crafting effective environmental solutions.

For professionals aiming to advance their qualifications without the lengthy commitment of traditional research, options like 1 year PhD programs online no dissertation offer accelerated pathways to doctorate-level credentials. These programs are ideal for those balancing career and study.

Educators and environmental advocates can benefit from specialized training through an online EdS to EdD bridge program, which facilitates advancement from education specialist degrees to doctoral qualifications, bolstering leadership and policy development skills in environmental education.

Best Scientists Citing Stacey M. Frith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles