World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
New Zealand
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
15611
World Ranking
4641
National Ranking
24

Greg Bodeker publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Bodeker sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 263 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Greg Bodeker D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg Bodeker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in New Zealand Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in New Zealand Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Climate change
  • Ecology

His scientific interests lie mostly in Climatology, Atmospheric sciences, Ozone, Stratosphere and Troposphere. The study of Climatology is intertwined with the study of Monthly average in a number of ways. His Atmospheric sciences research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Atmosphere and Radiative forcing.

In the field of Ozone, his study on Ozone depletion overlaps with subjects such as Solar cycle. His study in Stratosphere is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Trend surface analysis, Northern Hemisphere and Climate model. Greg Bodeker has included themes like Altitude, Seasonality and Atmospheric chemistry in his Troposphere study.

His most cited work include:

  • Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing (3610 citations)
  • Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past (383 citations)
  • Increased Summertime UV Radiation in New Zealand in Response to Ozone Loss (297 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Greg Bodeker focuses on Atmospheric sciences, Ozone, Stratosphere, Climatology and Meteorology. His study ties his expertise on Vortex together with the subject of Atmospheric sciences. His work on Montreal Protocol as part of his general Ozone study is frequently connected to Solar cycle, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

His research integrates issues of Atmospheric chemistry, Annual cycle and Altitude in his study of Stratosphere. His Climatology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Climate model and Greenhouse gas. His Meteorology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Nouvelle zelande, Lidar, Remote sensing and Spectrometer.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Atmospheric sciences (53.19%)
  • Ozone (48.40%)
  • Stratosphere (39.36%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Meteorology (26.06%)
  • Atmospheric sciences (53.19%)
  • Stratosphere (39.36%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Greg Bodeker mostly deals with Meteorology, Atmospheric sciences, Stratosphere, Climatology and Ozone. The concepts of his Meteorology study are interwoven with issues in Depth sounding, Source data, Remote sensing and Global climate. His Atmospheric sciences study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Potential vorticity, Water vapor and Propagation of uncertainty.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Middle latitudes, Troposphere and Greenhouse gas. His work deals with themes such as Vortex, Climate model and Radiative forcing, which intersect with Climatology. His study on Ozone layer, Equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine and Atmospheric chemistry is often connected to Segmented regression as part of broader study in Ozone.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends (86 citations)
  • Reference Upper-Air Observations for Climate: From Concept to Reality (57 citations)
  • Cross-disciplinarity in the advance of Antarctic ecosystem research (46 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Climate change
  • Ecology

His primary areas of investigation include Climatology, Meteorology, Stratosphere, Ozone and Atmospheric sciences. His Southern Hemisphere study in the realm of Climatology connects with subjects such as Climate Forecast System. He combines subjects such as Irradiance, Remote sensing and Global climate with his study of Meteorology.

Greg Bodeker specializes in Stratosphere, namely Ozone layer. Many of his research projects under Ozone are closely connected to Term and Segmented regression with Term and Segmented regression, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His work is dedicated to discovering how Atmospheric sciences, Water vapor are connected with Tropospheric ozone and Forcing and other disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing

    Piers Forster;Venkatachalam Ramaswamy;Paulo Artaxo;Terje Berntsen

  • Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

    V. Eyring;N. Butchart;D. W. Waugh;H. Akiyoshi

  • Increased summertime UV radiation in New Zealand in response to ozone loss.

    Richard McKenzie;Brian Connor;Greg Bodeker

  • Long-term changes in tropospheric ozone

    S.J. Oltmans;A.S. Lefohn;J.M. Harris;I. Galbally

  • Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

    V. Eyring;D. W. Waugh;G. E. Bodeker;Eugene C. Cordero

  • Global and zonal total ozone variations estimated from ground‐based and satellite measurements: 1964–2000

    V. E. Fioletov;G. E. Bodeker;A. J. Miller;R. D. McPeters

  • Ozone database in support of CMIP5 simulations: results and corresponding radiative forcing

    I. Cionni;V. Eyring;J. F. Lamarque;W. J. Randel

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • Trends in the Vertical Distribution of Ozone: A Comparison of Two Analyses of Ozonesonde Data

    J. A. Logan;I. A. Megretskaia;A. J. Miller;G. C. Tiao

  • Indicators of Antarctic ozone depletion

    G. E. Bodeker;H. Shiona;H. Eskes

  • Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends

    Neil R. P Harris;B Hassler;B Hassler;F Tummon;G E Bodeker

  • Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of the solar cycle in ozone and temperature

    John Austin;K. Tourpali;E. Rozanov;H. Akiyoshi

  • Assessment of SAGE version 6.1 ozone data quality

    Hsiang J. Wang;Derek M. Cunnold;Larry W. Thomason;Joseph M. Zawodny

  • Global ozone trends in potential vorticity coordinates using TOMS and GOME intercompared against the Dobson network: 1978-1998

    G. E. Bodeker;J. C. Scott;K. Kreher;R. L. McKenzie

  • Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100

    James Keeble;Birgit Hassler;Antara Banerjee;Antara Banerjee;Ramiro Checa-Garcia

  • Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)

    E. Dupuy;K.A. Walker;K.A. Walker;J. Kar;C.D. Boone

  • Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder Ozone by ozonesonde and lidar measurements

    Y. B. Jiang;L. Froidevaux;A. Lambert;N. J. Livesey

  • Short-term variations in the oxidizing power of the atmosphere.

    Martin R. Manning;David C. Lowe;Rowena C. Moss;Gregory E. Bodeker

  • Reference Upper-Air Observations for Climate: From Concept to Reality

    G.E. Bodeker;Stephan Bojinski;D. Cimini;R.D. Dirksen

  • An Algorithm for Inferring Surface UV Irradiance Including Cloud Effects

    Greg E. Bodeker;Richard L. McKenzie

  • A Trajectory-based Estimate of the Tropospheric Ozone Column Using the Residual Method

    M. R. Schoeberl;J. R. Ziemke;B. Bojkov;B. Bojkov;N. Livesey

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Martin Dameris
Martin Dameris German Aerospace Center
Martyn P. Chipperfield
Martyn P. Chipperfield University of Leeds
Veronika Eyring
Veronika Eyring University of Bremen
Richard S. Stolarski
Richard S. Stolarski Johns Hopkins University
Hans Claude
Hans Claude German Meteorological Service
Stacey M. Frith
Stacey M. Frith Goddard Space Flight Center
Brian J. Connor
Brian J. Connor National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Slimane Bekki
Slimane Bekki Sorbonne University
Dan Smale
Dan Smale National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that blend science, policy, and technology. For students interested in technical expertise, a geographic information systems degree is a valuable option. GIS skills are crucial in environmental monitoring, land management, and data analysis, providing a technological edge in this field.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and public administration, enrolling in one of the best online MPA programs can enhance leadership opportunities. These programs prepare graduates to design and implement sustainable policies that address climate change and resource conservation challenges.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is equally important. Degrees like the best online bachelors in sociology programs equip students with insights into human behavior and social patterns related to environmental issues, facilitating more effective community engagement and advocacy.

For professionals seeking advanced education with flexibility, pursuing an EdD without dissertation can be a strategic choice. This path supports those focused on leadership and teaching roles in environmental education without the intensive research dissertation requirement.

Best Scientists Citing Greg Bodeker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles