World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Peter

Thomas Peter

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
96
Citations
27346
World Ranking
464
National Ranking
15

Thomas Peter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Peter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 406 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas Peter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Peter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Peter is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has a substantial body of research primarily focused on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work concentrates significantly on Atmospheric Science and related subfields, contributing extensively to understanding atmospheric processes and environmental changes.

The scientist's research spans several connected topics, including:

  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering

Frequent publication venues for Thomas Peter include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Collaborative research is a notable aspect of this scientist's academic profile. Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Beiping Luo
  • Ulrich K. Krieger
  • Nir Bluvshtein
  • Aline Schaub
  • Irina Glas

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas Peter include:

  • European aerosol phenomenology − 8: Harmonised source apportionment of organic aerosol using 22 Year-long ACSM/AMS datasets (2022, Environment International)
  • Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion (2021, Reviews of Geophysics)
  • A global environmental crisis 42,000 years ago (2021, Science)
  • Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies (2021, Communications Earth & Environment)
  • Photolytic radical persistence due to anoxia in viscous aerosol particles (2021, Nature Communications)

Best Publications

  • Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions

    Thomas Koop;Beiping Luo;Athanasios Tsias;Thomas Peter

  • Stratospheric aerosol growth and HNO3 gas phase depletion from coupled HNO3 and water uptake by liquid particles

    K. S. Carslaw;B. P. Luo;S. L. Clegg;Th. Peter

  • New and extended parameterization of the thermodynamic model AIOMFAC: calculation of activity coefficients for organic-inorganic mixtures containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl, ether, ester, alkenyl, alkyl, and aromatic functional groups

    A. Zuend;C. Marcolli;A. M. Booth;D. M. Lienhard;D. M. Lienhard

  • A thermodynamic model of mixed organic-inorganic aerosols to predict activity coefficients

    A. Zuend;C. Marcolli;B. P. Luo;Th. Peter

  • An analytic expression for the composition of aqueous HNO3‐H2SO4 stratospheric aerosols including gas phase removal of HNO3

    Kenneth S. Carslaw;Beiping Luo;Thomas Peter

  • The detection of large HNO3-containing particles in the winter Arctic stratosphere.

    D. W. Fahey;R. S. Gao;K. S. Carslaw;J. Kettleborough

  • Mixing of the Organic Aerosol Fractions: Liquids as the Thermodynamically Stable Phases

    Claudia Marcolli;Beiping Luo;Thomas Peter

  • Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery

    William T. Ball;Justin Alsing;Justin Alsing;Daniel J. Mortlock;Daniel J. Mortlock;Johannes Staehelin

  • MICROPHYSICS AND HETEROGENEOUS CHEMISTRY OF POLAR STRATOSPHERIC CLOUDS

    Thomas Peter

  • Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone and Climate Assessments

    Veronika Eyring;Jean-François Lamarque;Peter Hess;Florian Arfeuille

  • Stratospheric water vapor predicted from the Lagrangian temperature history of air entering the stratosphere in the tropics

    S. Fueglistaler;M. Bonazzola;P.H. Haynes;Thomas Peter

  • Efficiency of immersion mode ice nucleation on surrogates of mineral dust

    C. Marcolli;S. Gedamke;T. Peter;B. Zobrist

  • Unprecedented evidence for deep convection hydrating the tropical stratosphere

    T. Corti;B. P. Luo;M. de Reus;D. Brunner

  • Arctic Ozone Loss Due to Denitrification

    A. E. Waibel;Th. Peter;K. S. Carslaw;H. Oelhaf

  • A global space-based stratospheric aerosol climatology: 1979–2016

    Larry W. Thomason;Nicholas Ernest;Luis Millán;Landon Rieger

  • The Impact of Geoengineering Aerosols on Stratospheric Temperature and Ozone

    P. Heckendorn;D. Weisenstein;Stephan Andreas Fueglistaler;B. P. Luo

  • Ultra-slow water diffusion in aqueous sucrose glasses

    Bernhard Zobrist;Bernhard Zobrist;Vacharaporn Soonsin;Bei P. Luo;Ulrich K. Krieger

  • Modeling the composition of liquid stratospheric aerosols

    Kenneth S. Carslaw;Thomas Peter;Simon L. Clegg

  • Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation Rate Coefficient of Water Droplets Coated by a Nonadecanol Monolayer

    B. Zobrist;Thomas Koop;B. P. Luo;C. Marcolli

  • Increased stratospheric ozone depletion due to mountain-induced atmospheric waves

    Kenneth S. Carslaw;Martin Wirth;A. Tsias;B.P. Luo

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Andrea Stenke
Andrea Stenke ETH Zurich
Beiping Luo
Beiping Luo ETH Zurich
Christopher R. Hoyle
Christopher R. Hoyle Paul Scherrer Institute
Kenneth S. Carslaw
Kenneth S. Carslaw University of Leeds
Stefan Brönnimann
Stefan Brönnimann University of Bern
Thomas Koop
Thomas Koop Bielefeld University
Holger Vömel
Holger Vömel National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise related to Environmental Sciences, pursuing complementary online degrees can offer valuable perspectives and career flexibility. Programs such as an online bachelors in sociology help students understand human behavior and societal impacts on the environment, which is vital for developing sustainable solutions.

Educators aiming to advance in environmental education or policy often seek advanced degrees without the traditional dissertation. Online edd no dissertation programs provide a streamlined path for professionals looking to enhance leadership skills in educational settings.

Additionally, bridging programs like eds to edd bridge programs online offer a flexible transition for those holding an EdS degree who want to pursue a Doctor of Education. These pathways can open doors to higher academic and administrative roles.

For social work professionals interested in integrating environmental justice into their practice, exploring the cheapest online dsw programs enables affordable advancement to a Doctorate in Social Work, enhancing their ability to advocate for vulnerable communities impacted by environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Peter

Trending Scientists