World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maria C. W. Peeters

Maria C. W. Peeters

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4769 4416 226 216 112 12417

Maria C. W. Peeters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maria C. W. Peeters between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria C. W. Peeters published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2019. 18 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2019. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
1994 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maria C. W. Peeters: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 4
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 8
2010 6
2011 7
2012 7
2013 4
2014 5
2015 4
2016 7
2017 7
2018 6
2019 14
2020 10
2021 8
2022 5
2023 0
2024 6
2025 12
Total 149
Download as CSV

Maria C. W. Peeters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria C. W. Peeters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maria C. W. Peeters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria C. W. Peeters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maria C. W. Peeters is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within business, management, and health professions, focusing substantially on organizational behavior, human resource management, and workplace well-being.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Health Professions

Within these fields, Peeters has contributed to research in several subfields such as:

  • General Health Professions
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Demography
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Major research topics covered in Peeters's work include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies

Peeters has published extensively, with frequent contributions to journals and venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Gedrag & Organisatie
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Examples of recent publications include:

  • "New directions in burnout research" (2021), published in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • "Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis" (2020), published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • "Creative performance pressure as a double-edged sword for creativity: The role of appraisals and resources" (2022), published in Human Resource Management
  • "Exploring the Role of Personal Demands in the Health-Impairment Process of the Job Demands-Resources Model: A Study among Master Students" (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Employee Sustainable Performance (E-SuPer): Theoretical Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Psychometric Properties" (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Frequent collaborators with whom Peeters has co-authored multiple papers include:

  • Toon W. Taris (13 publications)
  • Peikai Li (8 publications)
  • Jan de Jonge (6 publications)
  • Tianchang Ji (5 publications)
  • Eva Knies (5 publications)

Best Publications

  • Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement

    Paraskevas Petrou;Evangelia Demerouti;Maria C. W. Peeters;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Balancing Work and Home: How Job and Home Demands Are Related to Burnout

    Maria C. W. Peeters;Anthony J. Montgomery;Arnold B. Bakker;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Job Stress and Burnout Among Correctional Officers: A Literature Review

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Maria C. W. Peeters

  • Receiving instrumental support at work: when help is not welcome.

    Janna T Deelstra;Maria C W Peeters;Wilmar B Schaufeli;Wolfgang Stroebe

  • The job crafting intervention: effects on job resources, self-efficacy, and affective well-being

    Machteld van den Heuvel;Evangelia Demerouti;Maria C. W. Peeters

  • Antecedents and consequences of work-home interference among medical residents

    Sabine Geurts;Christel Rutte;Maria Peeters

  • Work-home interference among newspaper managers: Its relationship with burnout and engagement

    A. J. Montgomery;M. C. W. Peeters;W. B. Schaufeli;M. Den Ouden

  • Take Care! The Evaluation of a Team-Based Burnout Intervention Program for Oncology Care Providers

    Pascale M. Le Blanc;Joop J. Hox;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris

  • Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting.

    Jari J. Hakanen;Maria C. W. Peeters;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Emotional job demands and the role of matching job resources: A cross-sectional survey study among health care workers

    Jan de Jonge;Pascale M. Le Blanc;Maria C.W. Peeters;Hanneke Noordam

  • Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and at home: A 3‐year cross‐lagged panel study

    Jari J. Hakanen;Maria C. W. Peeters;Riku Perhoniemi

  • Specific relationships between job demands, job resources and psychological outcomes and the mediating role of negative work–home interference

    Peter P.M. Janssen;Maria C.W. Peeters;Jan de Jonge;Inge Houkes

  • Watching the paint dry at work: psychometric examination of the Dutch Boredom Scale

    Gaby Reijseger;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Maria C.W. Peeters;Toon W. Taris

  • Work–family interface from a life and career stage perspective: The role of demands and resources

    Evangelia Demerouti;Maria C. W. Peeters;Beatrice I. J. M. van der Heijden;Beatrice I. J. M. van der Heijden;Beatrice I. J. M. van der Heijden

  • From inequity to burnout: the role of job stress.

    Toon W. Taris;Maria C. W. Peeters;Pascale M. Le Blanc;Paul J. G. Schreurs

  • Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects

    U. Baran Metin;Toon W. Taris;Maria C.W. Peeters

  • Emotional job demands and burnout among oncology care providers

    Pascale M. Le Blanc;Arnold B. Bakker;Maria C. W. Peeters;Nicolette C. A. van Heesch

  • Juggling work and family responsibilities when involuntarily working more from home: A multiwave study of financial sales professionals

    Laurent M. Lapierre;Elianne F. van Steenbergen;Maria C. W. Peeters;Esther S. Kluwer

  • Towards a match between job demands and sources of social support: A study among oncology care providers

    Maria C. W. Peeters;Pascale M. Le Blanc

  • An introduction to contemporary work psychology

    M.C.W. Peeters;de J. Jonge;Toon W. Taris

  • An introduction to the work and well-being of older workers: From managing threats to creating opportunities.

    Maria C.W. Peeters;Hetty van Emmerik

Frequent Co-Authors

Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
Jari J. Hakanen
Jari J. Hakanen Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bram P. Buunk
Bram P. Buunk University of Groningen
Jan de Jonge
Jan de Jonge Eindhoven University of Technology
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Martin Euwema
Martin Euwema KU Leuven

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Psychology can open the door to diverse career opportunities, including roles in counseling, mental health support, and human services. Prospective students are often concerned about tuition costs, program flexibility, and ensuring their chosen degree is recognized by employers and licensing boards.

Fortunately, a growing number of universities across the USA offer affordable online counseling programs to help students achieve their career goals without the burden of excessive debt. For instance, several schools feature affordable counseling programs in Connecticut and competitive tuition rates on affordable counseling degrees in Des Moines.

If you're interested in studying further south, you can explore affordable counseling degrees in Florida or even seek out the cheapest counseling degrees in Georgia. These programs often allow learners to continue working while studying and provide pathways into counseling, therapy, school guidance, and related professions.

Best Scientists Citing Maria C. W. Peeters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles