World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrea Stenke

Andrea Stenke

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 51 4825 4620 120 114 164 7628

Andrea Stenke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea Stenke between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea Stenke published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2019. 9 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2019. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea Stenke: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 6
2005 3
2006 5
2007 4
2008 7
2009 7
2010 7
2011 3
2012 2
2013 4
2014 4
2015 7
2016 12
2017 22
2018 21
2019 23
2020 14
2021 9
2022 6
2023 19
2024 8
2025 1
Total 195
Download as CSV

Andrea Stenke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Stenke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 164
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrea Stenke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Stenke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232 51
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrea Stenke is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric science, global and planetary change, and related subfields.

The scientist's publication record includes significant work in atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics. Other prominent research topics include climate change and geoengineering, selenium in biological systems, air quality and health impacts, and the presence of heavy metals in the environment.

Frequent publication venues for Andrea Stenke include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • Nature Geoscience

Collaborators often working with Andrea Stenke encompass:

  • Thomas Peter
  • Gabriel Chiodo
  • Aryeh Feinberg
  • Timofei Sukhodolov
  • Eugene Rozanov

Their recent research contributions include the following papers:

  • "Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies", 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • "Inconsistencies between chemistry-climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998", 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble", 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Springtime arctic ozone depletion forces northern hemisphere climate anomalies", 2022, Nature Geoscience
  • "Constraining Atmospheric Selenium Emissions Using Observations, Global Modeling, and Bayesian Inference", 2020, Environmental Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • Stratospheric Aerosol--Observations, Processes, and Impact on Climate

    Stefanie Kremser;Larry W. Thomason;Marc von Hobe;Markus Hermann

  • Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics

    J. S. Fuglestvedt;K. P. Shine;T. Berntsen;J. Cook

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery

    William T. Ball;Justin Alsing;Justin Alsing;Daniel J. Mortlock;Daniel J. Mortlock;Johannes Staehelin

  • Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change.

    Zhen Zhang;Zhen Zhang;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Andrea Stenke;Xin Li

  • The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP) : experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6

    Davide Zanchettin;Myriam Khodri;Claudia Timmreck;Matthew Toohey;Matthew Toohey

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Simulation of stratospheric water vapor trends: impact on stratospheric ozone chemistry

    A. Stenke;V. Grewe

  • The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm

    A. Stenke;M. Schraner;M. Schraner;E. Rozanov;T. Egorova

  • Global atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions : aerosol-chemistry-climate model predictions and validation

    Jian-Xiong Sheng;Debra K. Weisenstein;Bei-Ping Luo;Eugene Rozanov

  • The Tropical Tropopause Layer 1960–2100

    Andrew Gettelman;Thomas Birner;Veronika Eyring;H. Akiyoshi

  • AirClim: an efficient tool for climate evaluation of aircraft technology

    Volker Grewe;Andrea Stenke

  • Long-term changes and variability in a transient simulation with a chemistry-climate model employing realistic forcing

    Martin Dameris;Volker Grewe;Michael Ponater;Rudolf Deckert

  • Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period

    Yuanhong Zhao;Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Xin Lin;Xin Lin

  • Drivers of the tropospheric ozone budget throughout the 21st century under the medium-high climate scenario RCP 6.0

    L.E. Revell;F. Tummon;A. Stenke;T. Sukhodolov

  • Springtime arctic ozone depletion forces northern hemisphere climate anomalies

    Unknown

  • Lagrangian transport of water vapor and cloud water in the ECHAM4 GCM and its impact on the cold bias

    Andrea Stenke;Volker Grewe;Michael Ponater

  • Revisiting the mystery of recent stratospheric temperature trends.

    Amanda C. Maycock;William J. Randel;Andrea K. Steiner;Alexey Yu Karpechko

  • Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies

    Aryeh Feinberg;Andrea Stenke;Thomas Peter;Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley;Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley

  • The influence of Middle Range Energy Electrons on atmospheric chemistry and regional climate

    P. Arsenovic;E. Rozanov;A. Stenke;Bernd Funke

  • Global long-term monitoring of the ozone layer – a prerequisite for predictions

    D. G. Loyola;R. M. Coldewey-Egbers;M. Dameris;H. Garny

  • Implications of Lagrangian transport for simulations with a coupled chemistry-climate model

    Andrea Stenke;Martin Dameris;Volker Grewe;Hella Garny

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Thomas Peter
Thomas Peter ETH Zurich
Volker Grewe
Volker Grewe German Aerospace Center
Patrick Jöckel
Patrick Jöckel German Aerospace Center
David A. Plummer
David A. Plummer Environment and Climate Change Canada
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Martin Dameris
Martin Dameris German Aerospace Center
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Giovanni Pitari
Giovanni Pitari University of L'Aquila
Luke D. Oman
Luke D. Oman Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education related to Environmental Sciences, exploring a variety of online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. For example, educators and professionals aiming to deepen their expertise might consider accredited eds to edd programs. These programs are designed to enhance leadership roles in educational and environmental policy settings.

Additionally, individuals looking to work on social issues linked to environment and community well-being may find valuable opportunities through the cheapest dsw program. Affordable options make advanced social work education accessible, helping graduates support vulnerable populations impacted by environmental changes.

For those seeking flexible and cost-effective options, an online general studies degree affordable program can provide a broad academic foundation. This interdisciplinary approach is helpful for students wanting to combine environmental sciences with other fields.

If you are new to higher education or want a manageable introduction to college studies, exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can guide you towards degree programs that balance workload and learning style effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Stenke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles