World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrea Stenke

Andrea Stenke

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
51
Citations
7628
World Ranking
4823
National Ranking
120

Andrea Stenke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Stenke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrea Stenke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Stenke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrea Stenke is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric science, global and planetary change, and related subfields.

The scientist's publication record includes significant work in atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics. Other prominent research topics include climate change and geoengineering, selenium in biological systems, air quality and health impacts, and the presence of heavy metals in the environment.

Frequent publication venues for Andrea Stenke include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • Nature Geoscience

Collaborators often working with Andrea Stenke encompass:

  • Thomas Peter
  • Gabriel Chiodo
  • Aryeh Feinberg
  • Timofei Sukhodolov
  • Eugene Rozanov

Their recent research contributions include the following papers:

  • "Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies", 2021, Communications Earth & Environment
  • "Inconsistencies between chemistry-climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998", 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble", 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Springtime arctic ozone depletion forces northern hemisphere climate anomalies", 2022, Nature Geoscience
  • "Constraining Atmospheric Selenium Emissions Using Observations, Global Modeling, and Bayesian Inference", 2020, Environmental Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • Stratospheric Aerosol--Observations, Processes, and Impact on Climate

    Stefanie Kremser;Larry W. Thomason;Marc von Hobe;Markus Hermann

  • Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics

    J. S. Fuglestvedt;K. P. Shine;T. Berntsen;J. Cook

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery

    William T. Ball;Justin Alsing;Justin Alsing;Daniel J. Mortlock;Daniel J. Mortlock;Johannes Staehelin

  • Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change.

    Zhen Zhang;Zhen Zhang;Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Andrea Stenke;Xin Li

  • The Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP) : experimental design and forcing input data for CMIP6

    Davide Zanchettin;Myriam Khodri;Claudia Timmreck;Matthew Toohey;Matthew Toohey

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Simulation of stratospheric water vapor trends: impact on stratospheric ozone chemistry

    A. Stenke;V. Grewe

  • The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm

    A. Stenke;M. Schraner;M. Schraner;E. Rozanov;T. Egorova

  • Global atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions : aerosol-chemistry-climate model predictions and validation

    Jian-Xiong Sheng;Debra K. Weisenstein;Bei-Ping Luo;Eugene Rozanov

  • The Tropical Tropopause Layer 1960–2100

    Andrew Gettelman;Thomas Birner;Veronika Eyring;H. Akiyoshi

  • AirClim: an efficient tool for climate evaluation of aircraft technology

    Volker Grewe;Andrea Stenke

  • Long-term changes and variability in a transient simulation with a chemistry-climate model employing realistic forcing

    Martin Dameris;Volker Grewe;Michael Ponater;Rudolf Deckert

  • Inter-model comparison of global hydroxyl radical (OH) distributions and their impact on atmospheric methane over the 2000–2016 period

    Yuanhong Zhao;Marielle Saunois;Philippe Bousquet;Xin Lin;Xin Lin

  • Drivers of the tropospheric ozone budget throughout the 21st century under the medium-high climate scenario RCP 6.0

    L.E. Revell;F. Tummon;A. Stenke;T. Sukhodolov

  • Springtime arctic ozone depletion forces northern hemisphere climate anomalies

    Unknown

  • Lagrangian transport of water vapor and cloud water in the ECHAM4 GCM and its impact on the cold bias

    Andrea Stenke;Volker Grewe;Michael Ponater

  • Revisiting the mystery of recent stratospheric temperature trends.

    Amanda C. Maycock;William J. Randel;Andrea K. Steiner;Alexey Yu Karpechko

  • Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and selenium to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies

    Aryeh Feinberg;Andrea Stenke;Thomas Peter;Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley;Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley

  • The influence of Middle Range Energy Electrons on atmospheric chemistry and regional climate

    P. Arsenovic;E. Rozanov;A. Stenke;Bernd Funke

  • Global long-term monitoring of the ozone layer – a prerequisite for predictions

    D. G. Loyola;R. M. Coldewey-Egbers;M. Dameris;H. Garny

  • Implications of Lagrangian transport for simulations with a coupled chemistry-climate model

    Andrea Stenke;Martin Dameris;Volker Grewe;Hella Garny

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Thomas Peter
Thomas Peter ETH Zurich
Volker Grewe
Volker Grewe German Aerospace Center
Patrick Jöckel
Patrick Jöckel German Aerospace Center
David A. Plummer
David A. Plummer Environment and Climate Change Canada
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research
Martin Dameris
Martin Dameris German Aerospace Center
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Giovanni Pitari
Giovanni Pitari University of L'Aquila
Luke D. Oman
Luke D. Oman Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education related to Environmental Sciences, exploring a variety of online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. For example, educators and professionals aiming to deepen their expertise might consider accredited eds to edd programs. These programs are designed to enhance leadership roles in educational and environmental policy settings.

Additionally, individuals looking to work on social issues linked to environment and community well-being may find valuable opportunities through the cheapest dsw program. Affordable options make advanced social work education accessible, helping graduates support vulnerable populations impacted by environmental changes.

For those seeking flexible and cost-effective options, an online general studies degree affordable program can provide a broad academic foundation. This interdisciplinary approach is helpful for students wanting to combine environmental sciences with other fields.

If you are new to higher education or want a manageable introduction to college studies, exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can guide you towards degree programs that balance workload and learning style effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Stenke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles