World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
11076
World Ranking
2820
National Ranking
1120

Luke D. Oman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke D. Oman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 218 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Luke D. Oman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke D. Oman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luke D. Oman is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric and environmental sciences, with extensive work in Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science.

Their scholarly output includes contributions to key subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Environmental Engineering. The topics covered in their research highlight specialized areas like Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Climate variability and models, and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting.

Luke D. Oman has authored several recent papers, including:

  • Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere (2020, Science Advances)
  • Ensemble-based deep learning for estimating PM2.5 over California with multisource big data including wildfire smoke (2020, Environment International)
  • The long-term transport and radiative impacts of the 2017 British Columbia pyrocumulonimbus smoke aerosols in the stratosphere (2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • The Montreal Protocol protects the terrestrial carbon sink (2021, Nature)
  • Mechanisms Linked to Recent Ozone Decreases in the Northern Hemisphere Lower Stratosphere (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)

The scientist frequently publishes in several established venues, demonstrating consistent contributions to leading journals in their field. These venues include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques

Collaboration is an integral part of their work. Frequent co-authors associated with Luke D. Oman encompass Scott D. Guzewich, J. A. Richardson, P. Whelley, Thomas J. Fauchez, and Ravi Kopparapu, each contributing to multiple publications with them.

Best Publications

  • Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections

    Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols.

    Philip J Rasch;Simone Tilmes;Richard P Turco;Alan Robock

  • Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability

    Michael J. Prather;Juno Hsu;Nicole M. DeLuca;Charles H. Jackman

  • Climatic response to high‐latitude volcanic eruptions

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy Stenchikov;Gavin A. Schmidt;Gavin A. Schmidt

  • Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals : Still catastrophic consequences

    Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated

    Paul A. Newman;L. D. Oman;A. R. Douglass;E. L. Fleming

  • Climatic consequences of regional nuclear conflicts

    A. Robock;L. Oman;G. L. Stenchikov;O. B. Toon

  • Did the Toba volcanic eruption of 74 ka B.P. produce widespread glaciation

    Alan Robock;Caspar M. Ammann;Luke Oman;Drew Shindell

  • High‐latitude eruptions cast shadow over the African monsoon and the flow of the Nile

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Thorvaldur Thordarson

  • Trends in Global Tropospheric Ozone Inferred from a Composite Record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS Satellite Measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI Simulation

    Jerald R. Ziemke;Jerald R. Ziemke;Luke D. Oman;Sarah A. Strode;Sarah A. Strode;Anne R. Douglass

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere.

    Audrey Gaudel;Owen R. Cooper;Kai-Lan Chang;Ilann Bourgeois

  • The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite measurements and a chemistry-climate simulation

    Luke D. Oman;Anne R. Douglass;Jerry R. Ziemke;Jerry R. Ziemke;Jose M. Rodriguez

  • Modeling the distribution of the volcanic aerosol cloud from the 1783–1784 Laki eruption

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Thorvaldur Thordarson;Thorvaldur Thordarson;Thorvaldur Thordarson

  • The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO

    L. D. Oman;J. R. Ziemke;J. R. Ziemke;A. R. Douglass;D. W. Waugh

  • Atmospheric volcanic loading derived from bipolar ice cores: Accounting for the spatial distribution of volcanic deposition

    Chaochao Gao;Luke Oman;Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Recent decline in extratropical lower stratospheric ozone attributed to circulation changes

    Krzysztof Wargan;Clara Orbe;Steven Pawson;Jerald R. Ziemke;Jerald R. Ziemke

  • Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols

    Ben Kravitz;Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Atmospheric effects and societal consequences of regional scale nuclear conflicts and acts of individual nuclear terrorism

    O. B. Toon;R. P. Turco;A. Robock;C. Bardeen

  • Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations.

    Glenn M. Wolfe;Glenn M. Wolfe;Julie M. Nicely;Julie M. Nicely;Jason M. St. Clair;Jason M. St. Clair;Thomas F. Hanisco

Frequent Co-Authors

Darryn W. Waugh
Darryn W. Waugh Johns Hopkins University
Anne R. Douglass
Anne R. Douglass Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard S. Stolarski
Richard S. Stolarski Johns Hopkins University
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Paul Newman
Paul Newman Goddard Space Flight Center
Alan Robock
Alan Robock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Chaim I. Garfinkel
Chaim I. Garfinkel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Georgiy L. Stenchikov
Georgiy L. Stenchikov King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Environmental Sciences can benefit from exploring related disciplines and flexible online degree options that align with their career goals. For those looking to enter public service or environmental policy, some of the easiest online MPA programs offer a streamlined path to gaining management skills applicable in government or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal dynamics is crucial in environmental work. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can deepen insights into human behavior and social structures that impact sustainable development projects.

For environmental professionals seeking advanced expertise without the extended commitment of traditional research, numerous doctoral programs online no dissertation provide alternative doctoral pathways. These programs emphasize practical leadership and policy knowledge, ideal for career advancement.

Furthermore, transitioning from educational specialist roles to doctoral level leadership is possible through accredited EDS to EDD programs. These pathways support growth in environmental education and advocacy, strengthening community engagement and outreach.

Best Scientists Citing Luke D. Oman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles