World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 61 2820 2695 1120 1039 218 11076

Luke D. Oman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luke D. Oman between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luke D. Oman published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2020. 13 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luke D. Oman: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 9
2007 6
2008 7
2009 10
2010 14
2011 10
2012 15
2013 10
2014 11
2015 13
2016 10
2017 19
2018 23
2019 21
2020 26
2021 10
2022 12
2023 10
2024 19
2025 12
2026 1
Total 271
Download as CSV

Luke D. Oman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke D. Oman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 218 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282 218
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Luke D. Oman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luke D. Oman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152 61
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Luke D. Oman is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on atmospheric and environmental sciences, with extensive work in Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science.

Their scholarly output includes contributions to key subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Environmental Engineering. The topics covered in their research highlight specialized areas like Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Climate variability and models, and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting.

Luke D. Oman has authored several recent papers, including:

  • Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere (2020, Science Advances)
  • Ensemble-based deep learning for estimating PM2.5 over California with multisource big data including wildfire smoke (2020, Environment International)
  • The long-term transport and radiative impacts of the 2017 British Columbia pyrocumulonimbus smoke aerosols in the stratosphere (2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics)
  • The Montreal Protocol protects the terrestrial carbon sink (2021, Nature)
  • Mechanisms Linked to Recent Ozone Decreases in the Northern Hemisphere Lower Stratosphere (2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres)

The scientist frequently publishes in several established venues, demonstrating consistent contributions to leading journals in their field. These venues include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques

Collaboration is an integral part of their work. Frequent co-authors associated with Luke D. Oman encompass Scott D. Guzewich, J. A. Richardson, P. Whelley, Thomas J. Fauchez, and Ravi Kopparapu, each contributing to multiple publications with them.

Best Publications

  • Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections

    Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)

    Olaf Morgenstern;Michaela I. Hegglin;Eugene Rozanov;Fiona M. O'Connor

  • An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols.

    Philip J Rasch;Simone Tilmes;Richard P Turco;Alan Robock

  • Measuring and modeling the lifetime of nitrous oxide including its variability

    Michael J. Prather;Juno Hsu;Nicole M. DeLuca;Charles H. Jackman

  • Climatic response to high‐latitude volcanic eruptions

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy Stenchikov;Gavin A. Schmidt;Gavin A. Schmidt

  • Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals : Still catastrophic consequences

    Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated

    Paul A. Newman;L. D. Oman;A. R. Douglass;E. L. Fleming

  • Climatic consequences of regional nuclear conflicts

    A. Robock;L. Oman;G. L. Stenchikov;O. B. Toon

  • Did the Toba volcanic eruption of 74 ka B.P. produce widespread glaciation

    Alan Robock;Caspar M. Ammann;Luke Oman;Drew Shindell

  • High‐latitude eruptions cast shadow over the African monsoon and the flow of the Nile

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Thorvaldur Thordarson

  • Trends in Global Tropospheric Ozone Inferred from a Composite Record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS Satellite Measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI Simulation

    Jerald R. Ziemke;Jerald R. Ziemke;Luke D. Oman;Sarah A. Strode;Sarah A. Strode;Anne R. Douglass

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere.

    Audrey Gaudel;Owen R. Cooper;Kai-Lan Chang;Ilann Bourgeois

  • The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite measurements and a chemistry-climate simulation

    Luke D. Oman;Anne R. Douglass;Jerry R. Ziemke;Jerry R. Ziemke;Jose M. Rodriguez

  • Modeling the distribution of the volcanic aerosol cloud from the 1783–1784 Laki eruption

    Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Thorvaldur Thordarson;Thorvaldur Thordarson;Thorvaldur Thordarson

  • The response of tropical tropospheric ozone to ENSO

    L. D. Oman;J. R. Ziemke;J. R. Ziemke;A. R. Douglass;D. W. Waugh

  • Atmospheric volcanic loading derived from bipolar ice cores: Accounting for the spatial distribution of volcanic deposition

    Chaochao Gao;Luke Oman;Luke Oman;Alan Robock;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Recent decline in extratropical lower stratospheric ozone attributed to circulation changes

    Krzysztof Wargan;Clara Orbe;Steven Pawson;Jerald R. Ziemke;Jerald R. Ziemke

  • Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols

    Ben Kravitz;Alan Robock;Luke Oman;Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Atmospheric effects and societal consequences of regional scale nuclear conflicts and acts of individual nuclear terrorism

    O. B. Toon;R. P. Turco;A. Robock;C. Bardeen

  • Mapping hydroxyl variability throughout the global remote troposphere via synthesis of airborne and satellite formaldehyde observations.

    Glenn M. Wolfe;Glenn M. Wolfe;Julie M. Nicely;Julie M. Nicely;Jason M. St. Clair;Jason M. St. Clair;Thomas F. Hanisco

Frequent Co-Authors

Darryn W. Waugh
Darryn W. Waugh Johns Hopkins University
Anne R. Douglass
Anne R. Douglass Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard S. Stolarski
Richard S. Stolarski Johns Hopkins University
Olaf Morgenstern
Olaf Morgenstern National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Paul Newman
Paul Newman Goddard Space Flight Center
Alan Robock
Alan Robock Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Chaim I. Garfinkel
Chaim I. Garfinkel Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Georgiy L. Stenchikov
Georgiy L. Stenchikov King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Douglas E. Kinnison
Douglas E. Kinnison National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Environmental Sciences can benefit from exploring related disciplines and flexible online degree options that align with their career goals. For those looking to enter public service or environmental policy, some of the easiest online MPA programs offer a streamlined path to gaining management skills applicable in government or nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal dynamics is crucial in environmental work. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can deepen insights into human behavior and social structures that impact sustainable development projects.

For environmental professionals seeking advanced expertise without the extended commitment of traditional research, numerous doctoral programs online no dissertation provide alternative doctoral pathways. These programs emphasize practical leadership and policy knowledge, ideal for career advancement.

Furthermore, transitioning from educational specialist roles to doctoral level leadership is possible through accredited EDS to EDD programs. These pathways support growth in environmental education and advocacy, strengthening community engagement and outreach.

Best Scientists Citing Luke D. Oman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles