World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8591 8025 861 822 98 6109
Neuroscience 39 8330 7695 614 567 101 6116

Quinton Deeley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Quinton Deeley between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Quinton Deeley published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2009. 17 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2009. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 8 publications
2001 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Quinton Deeley: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 6
2007 2
2008 4
2009 10
2010 4
2011 8
2012 5
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 6
2017 2
2018 2
2019 6
2020 8
2021 3
2022 5
2023 8
2024 9
2025 8
Total 117
Download as CSV

Quinton Deeley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quinton Deeley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 101 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 101
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Quinton Deeley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quinton Deeley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Quinton Deeley is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has a multidisciplinary research profile spanning medicine, neuroscience, and psychology. Their work engages with psychiatric and mental health issues, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology, with emphases also in philosophy and experimental cognitive psychology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, autism spectrum disorder research, mental health and psychiatry, pain management and placebo effects, schizophrenia research and treatment, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Deeley has contributed to several scholarly publications, especially in the following venues:

  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • BMC Medicine
  • Religion Brain & Behavior
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Consciousness and Cognition

The following list includes recent papers authored or co-authored by Deeley, featuring titles, publication years, and venues:

  • Females with ADHD: An expert consensus statement taking a lifespan approach providing guidance for the identification and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in girls and women (2020, BMC Psychiatry)
  • Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda (2021, NeuroImage Clinical)
  • Guidance for identification and treatment of individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder based upon expert consensus (2020, BMC Medicine)
  • Direct verbal suggestibility: Measurement and significance (2021, Consciousness and Cognition)
  • Paranoia, sensitization and social inference: findings from two large-scale, multi-round behavioural experiments (2020, Royal Society Open Science)

Collaboration forms an integral part of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jack Hollingdale
  • Emma Woodhouse
  • Mitul A. Mehta
  • Vaughan Bell
  • Susan Young

The intersection of Deeley's research with both clinical and cognitive neuroscience fields makes their contributions relevant to understanding and treating complex neuropsychiatric conditions. The focus on lifespan approaches within ADHD and autism spectrum disorders indicates an interest in developmental trajectories and tailored interventions.

Best Publications

  • Altered connections on the road to psychopathy

    M. C. Craig;M. Catani;Q. Deeley;R. Latham

  • Early Specialization for Voice and Emotion Processing in the Infant Brain

    Anna Blasi;Evelyne Mercure;Sarah Lloyd-Fox;Alex Thomson

  • Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome

    Marco Catani;Derek K. Jones;Eileen M. Daly;Nitzia Embiricos

  • Facial emotion processing in criminal psychopathy. Preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Quinton Deeley;Eileen Daly;Simon Surguladze;Nigel Tunstall

  • Dissociation in hysteria and hypnosis: evidence from cognitive neuroscience

    Vaughan Bell;David A Oakley;Peter W Halligan;Quinton Deeley

  • In vivo 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of amygdala-hippocampal and parietal regions in autism.

    Lisa A Page;Eileen Daly;Nicole Schmitz;Andrew Simmons

  • Cortical Anatomy in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An In Vivo MRI Study on the Effect of Age

    Armin Raznahan;Roberto Toro;Eileen Daly;Dene Robertson

  • The anatomy of extended limbic pathways in Asperger syndrome: a preliminary diffusion tensor imaging tractography study.

    Luca Pugliese;Marco Catani;Stephanie Ameis;Flavio Dell'Acqua

  • A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of inhibitory control in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Lisa A. Page;Katya Rubia;Quinton Deeley;Eileen Daly

  • Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda.

    David L Perez;Timothy R Nicholson;Ali A Asadi-Pooya;Indrit Bègue

  • White matter microstructural abnormalities in the frontal lobe of adults with antisocial personality disorder

    Frederick Sundram;Frederick Sundram;Quinton Deeley;Sagari Sarkar;Eileen Daly

  • The mental health of individuals referred for assessment of autism spectrum disorder in adulthood: A clinic report:

    Ailsa J. Russell;Clodagh M. Murphy;Ellie Wilson;Nicola Gillan

  • Modulating the Default Mode Network Using Hypnosis

    Quinton Deeley;David A Oakley;Brian Toone;Vincent Giampietro

  • Clinical and anatomical heterogeneity in autistic spectrum disorder: a structural MRI study

    Fiona Toal;Eileen Daly;Lisa Page;Quinton Deeley

  • Guidance for identification and treatment of individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder based upon expert consensus

    Susan Young;Jack Hollingdale;Michael Absoud;Michael Absoud;Patrick Bolton

  • An fMRI study of facial emotion processing in children and adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

    Rayna Azuma;Rayna Azuma;Quinton Deeley;Quinton Deeley;Linda E. Campbell;Eileen M. Daly

  • An event related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of facial emotion processing in Asperger syndrome.

    Quinton Deeley;Eileen M. Daly;Simon Surguladze;Lisa Page

  • Frontotemporal white-matter microstructural abnormalities in adolescents with conduct disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

    S. Sarkar;M. C. Craig;M. Catani;F. Dell'acqua

  • White matter integrity in Asperger syndrome: a preliminary diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study in adults.

    Oswald J. N. Bloemen;Quinton Deeley;Fred Sundram;Fred Sundram;Eileen M. Daly

  • Altered connections on the road to psychopathy

    Meghan Craig;Marco Catani;Quinton Deeley;Richard Kanaan

Frequent Co-Authors

Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Eileen Daly
Eileen Daly King's College London
Vaughan Bell
Vaughan Bell University College London
Michael C. Craig
Michael C. Craig King's College London
Mitul A. Mehta
Mitul A. Mehta King's College London
Peter W. Halligan
Peter W. Halligan Cardiff University
Michael Brammer
Michael Brammer King's College London
Vincent Giampietro
Vincent Giampietro King's College London
Brian Hallahan
Brian Hallahan University of Galway
Mary L. Phillips
Mary L. Phillips University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of career pathways, including research, healthcare, and technology. For those seeking a flexible path, earning an accelerated bachelor's degree online can help jumpstart your journey in less time than traditional programs.

Neuroscience combines biology, psychology, and data science skills—fields known for strong job prospects. If future earnings are a top priority, it’s smart to consider the highest earning degrees or review the best degrees to make money. Many neuroscience graduates pursue in-demand roles in biotech, pharmaceuticals, medical research, or clinical practice.

Cost is also an important consideration in your education decisions. Finding the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA can help minimize student debt and maximize your return on investment.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to advance, the right online degree can prepare you for exciting, high-growth careers connected to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Quinton Deeley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles