World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margot J. Taylor

Margot J. Taylor

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
77
Citations
23590
World Ranking
1644
National Ranking
87

Margot J. Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margot J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 295 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Margot J. Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margot J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margot J. Taylor is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with significant focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics of Taylor's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research, and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications.

Recent papers authored by Taylor cover a range of subjects and were published in prominent journals:

  • Regulation of autism-relevant behaviors by cerebellar-prefrontal cortical circuits, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Using OPM-MEG in contrasting magnetic environments, 2022, NeuroImage
  • Subtly altered topological asymmetry of brain structural covariance networks in autism spectrum disorder across 43 datasets from the ENIGMA consortium, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Sex/gender differences in the human autistic brains: A systematic review of 20 years of neuroimaging research, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Tracking the neurodevelopmental trajectory of beta band oscillations with optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography, 2024, eLife

Frequent coauthors in Taylor's collaborations include Evdokia Anagnostou, Marlee M. Vandewouw, Jason P. Lerch, Jennifer Crosbie, and Russell Schachar, reflecting an extensive network of scientific partnerships.

Publication venues where Taylor has contributed multiple times highlight the scope and focus of their research. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria

    Terence W. Picton;S. Bentin;P. Berg;E. Donchin

  • Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions

    Unknown

  • Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations.

    Marie Arsalidou;Margot J. Taylor

  • N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal Differences between Object and Face Processing Using ERPs

    Roxane J. Itier;Margot J. Taylor

  • Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs.

    Roxane J. Itier;Margot J. Taylor

  • Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects.

    Roxane J. Itier;Margot J. Taylor

  • Developmental dyslexia

    Unknown

  • Review of neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorders: what have we learned and where we go from here.

    Evdokia Anagnostou;Margot J Taylor

  • The Faces of Development: A Review of Early Face Processing over Childhood

    M. J. Taylor;M. Batty;R. J. Itier

  • Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity?

    Roxane J. Itier;Marianne Latinus;Margot J. Taylor

  • Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children.

    Margot J. Taylor;Gillian E. Edmonds;Gregory McCarthy;Truett Allison

  • ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces

    Margot J Taylor;Gregory McCarthy;Elie Saliba;Eric Degiovanni

  • Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.

    Roxane J Itier;Margot J Taylor

  • Altered structural brain asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder in a study of 54 datasets

    Merel C. Postema;Daan van Rooij;Evdokia Anagnostou;Celso Arango

  • The role of executive functions in social impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Rachel C. Leung;Vanessa M. Vogan;Tamara L. Powell;Evdokia Anagnostou

  • Regulation of autism-relevant behaviors by cerebellar–prefrontal cortical circuits

    Elyza Kelly;Fantao Meng;Hirofumi Fujita;Felipe Morgado

  • Spatio temporal Dynamics of Face Recognition

    Emmanuel J Barbeau;Margot J Taylor;Jean Regis;Jean Regis;Patrick Marquis;Patrick Marquis

  • Risk factors associated with self-injurious behaviors in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders

    Emma G. Duerden;Hannah K. Oatley;Kathleen M. Mak-Fan;Kathleen M. Mak-Fan;Patricia A. McGrath

  • Face processing stages: impact of difficulty and the separation of effects.

    Marianne Latinus;Margot J. Taylor

  • The centre of the brain: topographical model of motor, cognitive, affective, and somatosensory functions of the basal ganglia.

    Marie Arsalidou;Emma G. Duerden;Margot J. Taylor

  • Lateralization of affective processing in the insula

    Emma G. Duerden;Marie Arsalidou;Minha Lee;Margot J. Taylor;Margot J. Taylor

  • Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?

    Alexandra Séverac Cauquil;Gillian E. Edmonds;Margot J. Taylor

  • Face Recognition Memory and Configural Processing: A Developmental ERP Study using Upright, Inverted, and Contrast-Reversed Faces

    Roxane J. Itier;Margot J. Taylor

  • Regional differences in grey and white matter in children and adults with autism spectrum disorders: an activation likelihood estimate (ALE) meta-analysis.

    Emma G. Duerden;Kathleen M. Mak-Fan;Margot J. Taylor;S. Wendy Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Evdokia Anagnostou
Evdokia Anagnostou Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Elizabeth W. Pang
Elizabeth W. Pang Hospital for Sick Children
Mary Lou Smith
Mary Lou Smith University of Toronto
Sam M. Doesburg
Sam M. Doesburg Simon Fraser University
John G. Sled
John G. Sled University of Toronto
M. Mallar Chakravarty
M. Mallar Chakravarty McGill University
Jason P. Lerch
Jason P. Lerch Hospital for Sick Children
Meng-Chuan Lai
Meng-Chuan Lai Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Russell Schachar
Russell Schachar University of Toronto
Michael V. Lombardo
Michael V. Lombardo Italian Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology often opens doors to a range of related fields, including social work and counseling. Many students are choosing to explore these pathways through affordable online programs, allowing for greater flexibility and lower costs.

If you’re interested in social work, consider researching the most affordable social work degree programs in Nevada, as well as options for affordable social work degrees in Ohio. These programs are designed to prepare graduates for licensure and meaningful careers making a difference in their communities.

Budget-conscious students may also want to look into the cheapest social work degrees in Pennsylvania or the cheapest social work programs in Portland. These programs provide a solid foundation in mental health, case management, and community engagement.

Whether you’re pursuing psychology or a related field, researching affordable degree options can help you maximize your career potential while minimizing student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Margot J. Taylor

Trending Scientists