World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bert De Smedt

Bert De Smedt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 55 4403 4073 62 59 337 11523

Bert De Smedt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bert De Smedt between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bert De Smedt published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 16.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2015. 17 of the 403 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2015. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 10 publications
2001 2025

403 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bert De Smedt: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 5
2004 4
2005 4
2006 6
2007 15
2008 15
2009 24
2010 24
2011 27
2012 16
2013 16
2014 33
2015 34
2016 31
2017 20
2018 24
2019 26
2020 17
2021 18
2022 12
2023 13
2024 7
2025 10
Total 403
Download as CSV

Bert De Smedt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bert De Smedt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 337 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 337
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bert De Smedt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bert De Smedt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 55
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bert De Smedt is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and conducts research primarily in the intersecting fields of mathematics, psychology, and social sciences. Their work emphasizes cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, mathematics education and teaching techniques, and reading and literacy development.

The scientist's research spans several specific areas, including:

  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Mathematics education and teaching techniques
  • Reading and literacy development
  • Neuroscience, education and cognitive function
  • Mathematics education and pedagogy
  • Children's physical and motor development
  • Neuroscience and music perception

Their scholarly output includes contributions to core subjects such as statistics and probability, education, developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and applied mathematics.

Frequent coauthors include Joke Torbeyns, Lieven Verschaffel, Elien Bellon, Maaike Vandermosten, and Stijn Van Der Auwera, reflecting ongoing collaborative work in related domains.

Key publication venues for Bert De Smedt's research are:

  • Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Child Development
  • Cognitive Development
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bert De Smedt include:

  • "Probing the Relationship Between Home Numeracy and Children's Mathematical Skills: A Systematic Review," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Next directions in measurement of the home mathematics environment: An international and interdisciplinary perspective," 2021, Journal of Numerical Cognition
  • "Cognitive correlates of dyslexia, dyscalculia and comorbid dyslexia/dyscalculia: Effects of numerical magnitude processing and phonological processing," 2020, Research in Developmental Disabilities
  • "Mathematical language and mathematical abilities in preschool: A systematic literature review," 2022, Educational Research Review
  • "Developmental brain dynamics of numerical and arithmetic abilities," 2021, npj Science of Learning

Best Publications

  • Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis

    Michael Schneider;Kassandra Beeres;Leyla Coban;Simon Merz

  • How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior

    Bert De Smedt;Marie-Pascale Noel;Camilla K. Gilmore;Daniel Ansari

  • Working Memory and Individual Differences in Mathematics Achievement: A Longitudinal Study from First Grade to Second Grade.

    Bert De Smedt;Rianne Janssen;Kelly Bouwens;Lieven Verschaffel

  • The Predictive Value of Numerical Magnitude Comparison for Individual Differences in Mathematics Achievement.

    Bert De Smedt;Lieven Verschaffel;Pol Ghesquière

  • Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties

    Bert De Smedt;Camilla K. Gilmore

  • Association between Basic Numerical Abilities and Mathematics Achievement.

    Delphine Sasanguie;Bert De Smedt;Emmy Defever;Bert Reynvoet

  • How is phonological processing related to individual differences in children's arithmetic skills?

    Bert De Smedt;Jessica Taylor;Lisa Archibald;Daniel Ansari

  • Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field

    Daniel Ansari;Bert De Smedt;Roland H. Grabner

  • Associations of Number Line Estimation With Mathematical Competence: A Meta-analysis.

    Michael Schneider;Simon Merz;Johannes Stricker;Bert De Smedt

  • Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where will the journey take us?

    Daniel Ansari;Donna Coch;Bert De Smedt;Bert De Smedt

  • Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies.

    Lien Peters;Bert De Smedt

  • Effects of problem size and arithmetic operation on brain activation during calculation in children with varying levels of arithmetical fluency

    Bert De Smedt;Ian D. Holloway;Daniel Ansari

  • Modelling Relations between Sensory Processing, Speech Perception, Orthographic and Phonological Ability, and Literacy Achievement.

    Bart Boets;Jan Wouters;Astrid van Wieringen;Bert De Smedt

  • Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: evidence from developmental dyslexia.

    Bert De Smedt;Bart Boets

  • Towards a further characterization of phonological and literacy problems in Dutch-speaking children with dyslexia

    Bart Boets;Bert de Smedt;Leen Cleuren;Ellen Vandewalle

  • A validation of eye movements as a measure of elementary school children's developing number sense

    Michael Schneider;Angela Heine;Verena Thaler;Joke Torbeyns

  • Numerical Magnitude Representations and Individual Differences in Children's Arithmetic Strategy Use

    Kiran Vanbinst;Pol Ghesquière;Bert De Smedt

  • Are individual differences in arithmetic fact retrieval related to inhibition

    Elien Bellon;Wim Fias;Bert De Smedt

  • Cognitive Neuroscience Meets Mathematics Education.

    Bert De Smedt;Daniel Ansari;Roland H. Grabner;Minna M. Hannula

  • The Principles and Practices of Educational Neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016)

    Paul A. Howard-Jones;Sashank Varma;Daniel Ansari;Brian Butterworth

  • Oscillatory EEG correlates of arithmetic strategy use in addition and subtraction.

    Bert De Smedt;Roland H. Grabner;Bettina Studer;Bettina Studer

Frequent Co-Authors

Bert Reynvoet
Bert Reynvoet KU Leuven
Hans Op de Beeck
Hans Op de Beeck Allen Institute for Brain Science
Roland H. Grabner
Roland H. Grabner University of Graz
Jan Elen
Jan Elen KU Leuven
Bart Boets
Bart Boets KU Leuven
Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens numerous career possibilities in healthcare, counseling, education, and community support. One increasingly popular pathway is substance abuse counseling—a field that addresses addiction and mental health nationwide.

Becoming a licensed counselor involves meeting specific state requirements. For instance, you can explore substance abuse counselor requirements in Madison, which emphasize accredited degrees and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, understanding the Memphis substance abuse counselors education requirements is essential for those considering a career in Tennessee.

Online psychology degrees make it easier to meet education and licensure needs. Many programs are designed to align with regional regulations, as outlined in resources on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Mesa and how to become a substance abuse counselor in Miami.

Before choosing your pathway, review local guidelines and accredited degree options. Specializations and licensing standards can vary widely, so researching state-specific education and practicum requirements will help you prepare for success in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Bert De Smedt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles