World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roland H. Grabner

Roland H. Grabner

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6625 6167 31 30 150 9770
Neuroscience 45 6852 6303 43 43 153 9876

Roland H. Grabner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roland H. Grabner between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roland H. Grabner published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 7 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roland H. Grabner: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 6
2006 3
2007 6
2008 4
2009 12
2010 10
2011 9
2012 10
2013 11
2014 8
2015 7
2016 8
2017 8
2018 6
2019 8
2020 11
2021 15
2022 5
2023 7
2024 3
2025 4
Total 165
Download as CSV

Roland H. Grabner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland H. Grabner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Roland H. Grabner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roland H. Grabner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roland H. Grabner is affiliated with the University of Graz in Austria. Their research spans primarily the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a significant focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Neurology.

Their work covers various topics such as cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, neuroscience in education and cognitive function, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, reading and literacy development, creativity in education and neuroscience, education, achievement and giftedness, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Grabner's frequently published venues include Scientific Reports, Brain Stimulation, Neuropsychologia, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, and Learning and Individual Differences.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Grabner are:

  • Stephan Vogel
  • Jochen A. Mosbacher
  • Clemens Brunner
  • Michael A. Nitsche
  • Michaela A. Meier

Among the recent papers associated with or related to Grabner's field of work are:

  • Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) published in Brain Stimulation
  • Talent Development in Achievement Domains: A Psychological Framework for Within- and Cross-Domain Research (2020) published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Creativity myths: Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity (2021) published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement (2022) published in Nature Protocols
  • Believing in Neuromyths Makes Neither a Bad Nor Good Student-Teacher: The Relationship between Neuromyths and Academic Achievement in Teacher Education (2020) published in Mind Brain and Education

Best Publications

  • Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load

    Pavlo Antonenko;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Roland Grabner;Tamara van Gog

  • The creative brain: investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and FMRI.

    Andreas Fink;Roland H. Grabner;Mathias Benedek;Gernot Reishofer

  • To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving

    Roland H. Grabner;Daniel Ansari;Karl Koschutnig;Gernot Reishofer

  • Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation

    Roland H. Grabner;Daniel Ansari;Gernot Reishofer;Elsbeth Stern

  • Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: evidence from an fMRI study.

    Andreas Fink;Roland H. Grabner;Daniela Gebauer;Gernot Reishofer

  • Creativity meets neuroscience: experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking.

    Andreas Fink;Mathias Benedek;Roland H Grabner;Beate Staudt

  • Superior performance and neural efficiency : The impact of intelligence and expertise

    Roland H. Grabner;Aljoscha C. Neubauer;Elsbeth Stern

  • Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field

    Daniel Ansari;Bert De Smedt;Roland H. Grabner

  • Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement : Their interrelations in grades 5 and 6

    Michael Schneider;Roland H. Grabner;Jennifer Paetsch

  • Dyscalculia from a developmental and differential perspective

    Liane Kaufmann;Michèle M. Mazzocco;Ann Dowker;Michael von Aster;Michael von Aster;Michael von Aster

  • Sensitivity of human EEG alpha band desynchronization to different working memory components and increasing levels of memory load.

    A. Stipacek;R.H. Grabner;C. Neuper;A. Fink

  • Divergent thinking training is related to frontal electroencephalogram alpha synchronization

    Andreas Fink;Roland H. Grabner;Mathias Benedek;Aljoscha C. Neubauer

  • EEG alpha band dissociation with increasing task demands.

    A. Fink;R.H. Grabner;C. Neuper;A.C. Neubauer

  • Intelligence and neural efficiency: further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship

    Aljoscha C. Neubauer;Roland H. Grabner;Andreas Fink;Christa Neuper

  • Intelligence and working memory systems: evidence of neural efficiency in alpha band ERD

    R.H Grabner;A Fink;A Stipacek;C Neuper

  • Brain correlates of self-rated originality of ideas: Evidence from event-related power and phase-locking changes in the EEG.

    Roland H. Grabner;Andreas Fink;Aljoscha C. Neubauer

  • Intelligence and individual differences in becoming neurally efficient.

    Aljoscha C. Neubauer;Roland H. Grabner;H.Harald Freudenthaler;Jens F. Beckmann

  • Individual differences in chess expertise: a psychometric investigation.

    Roland H. Grabner;Elsbeth Stern;Aljoscha C. Neubauer

  • Fact learning in complex arithmetic and figural-spatial tasks: the role of the angular gyrus and its relation to mathematical competence.

    Roland H. Grabner;Anja Ischebeck;Gernot Reishofer;Karl Koschutnig

  • Cognitive Neuroscience Meets Mathematics Education.

    Bert De Smedt;Daniel Ansari;Roland H. Grabner;Minna M. Hannula

Frequent Co-Authors

Bert De Smedt
Bert De Smedt KU Leuven
Andreas Fink
Andreas Fink University of Graz
Aljoscha C. Neubauer
Aljoscha C. Neubauer University of Graz
Karl Koschutnig
Karl Koschutnig University of Graz
Clemens Brunner
Clemens Brunner University of Graz
Christa Neuper
Christa Neuper University of Graz
Daniel Ansari
Daniel Ansari University of Western Ontario
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Anja Ischebeck
Anja Ischebeck University of Graz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to a variety of rewarding and flexible career paths in the USA. For those looking to quickly enhance their qualifications, certificate programs that pay well can offer targeted training in high-demand areas such as health informatics, behavioral science, or clinical research.

Online learning is more accessible than ever, allowing students to tailor their studies to their personal and professional goals. There are a range of online college degrees that complement a background in neuroscience, from psychology to health administration.

For those interested in impactful, client-focused roles, social work is a meaningful pathway. Many choose msw programs online to prepare for careers in mental health counseling, rehabilitation, or community leadership.

Another specialized path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. Pursuing bcba certification online offers a flexible route to working with individuals with developmental or behavioral challenges, further amplifying the influence of neuroscience in practical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Roland H. Grabner

Trending Scientists