World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 47 2708 2455 1310 1176 72 15612

Patricia A. Labosky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia A. Labosky between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia A. Labosky published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2010. 2 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2010. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1993 2025

82 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia A. Labosky: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 3
1995 3
1996 4
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 5
2007 2
2008 7
2009 4
2010 8
2011 8
2012 3
2013 4
2014 3
2015 1
2016 3
2017 0
2018 2
2019 0
2020 2
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 1
Total 82
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Labosky publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Labosky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 67–76 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 72 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65 72
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Labosky D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Labosky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 47
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia A. Labosky is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within biomedicine, with a primary focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, along with significant contributions to medicine. Their scholarly activity emphasizes molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, pharmacology, anesthesiology and pain medicine, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their recent publications illustrate a diverse scientific interest. Notable papers include:

  • Predicting chronic postsurgical pain: current evidence and a novel program to develop predictive biomarker signatures (2023, Pain)
  • The NIH "BEST" programs: Institutional programs, the program evaluation, and early data (2020, The FASEB Journal)
  • Extracellular RNA communication: A decade of NIH common fund support illuminates exRNA biology (2025, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles)
  • Early Findings from the NIH BEST Cross-Site Evaluation (2020, The FASEB Journal)
  • Endocardial cells are a distinct endothelial lineage derived from Flk1+ multipotent cardiovascular progenitors (2021, UNC Libraries)

Their research topics frequently address areas such as pain management and placebo effects, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pain management and opioid use, and health and medical research impacts. Additionally, their work touches on doctoral education challenges and solutions, scientometrics and bibliometrics research, and the role of extracellular vesicles in disease.

Labosky has collaborated with multiple researchers throughout their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Rebecca N. Lenzi
  • Nicolas Johnston
  • John S. Satterlee
  • Kathleen A. Sluka
  • Tor D. Wager

Their studies have been published in several journals, with recurring publications in The FASEB Journal and UNC Libraries, alongside contributions to Pain, the Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, and Ból.

Best Publications

  • Bone morphogenetic protein-4 is required for mesoderm formation and patterning in the mouse.

    Glenn Winnier;M. Blessing;P. A. Labosky;B. L.M. Hogan

  • PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum

    Martin F. Offield;Tom L. Jetton;Patricia A. Labosky;Michael Ray

  • HIF-2α regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth

    Kelly L. Covello;James Kehler;Hongwei Yu;John D. Gordan

  • Effects on blood pressure and exploratory behaviour of mice lacking angiotensin II type-2 receptor

    T. Ichiki;P. A. Labosky;C. Shiota;S. Okuyama

  • A dermal niche for multipotent adult skin-derived precursor cells

    Karl J. L. Fernandes;Ian A. McKenzie;Ian A. McKenzie;Pleasantine Mill;Kristen M. Smith

  • Intestinal tumorigenesis is suppressed in mice lacking the metalloproteinase matrilysin

    Carole L. Wilson;Kathleen J. Heppner;Patricia A. Labosky;Brigid L. M. Hogan

  • The zinc-finger transcription factor Klf4 is required for terminal differentiation of goblet cells in the colon.

    Jonathan P. Katz;Nathalie Perreault;Bree G. Goldstein;Catherine S. Lee

  • Gene targeting in mice reveals a requirement for angiotensin in the development and maintenance of kidney morphology and growth factor regulation.

    F Niimura;P A Labosky;J Kakuchi;S Okubo

  • Requirement for Foxd3 in maintaining pluripotent cells of the early mouse embryo

    Lynn A. Hanna;Ruth K. Foreman;Illya A. Tarasenko;Daniel S. Kessler

  • Mouse embryonic germ (EG) cell lines : transmission through the germline and differences in the methylation imprint of insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r) gene compared with embryonic stem (ES) cell lines

    Patricia A. Labosky;Denise P. Barlow;Brigid L. M. Hogan

  • Conditional gene targeting in mouse pancreatic β-cells: Analysis of ectopic Cre transgene expression in the brain

    Barton Wicksteed;Marcela Brissova;Wenbo Yan;Darren M. Opland

  • The winged-helix transcription factor Foxd3 suppresses interneuron differentiation and promotes neural crest cell fate

    Mirella Dottori;Michael K. Gross;Patricia Labosky;Martyn Goulding

  • The gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein 8B is required for the initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis in the mouse.

    G.-Q. Zhao;K. Deng;P. A. Labosky;L. Liaw

  • Failure of ventral body wall closure in mouse embryos lacking a procollagen C-proteinase encoded by Bmp1, a mammalian gene related to Drosophila tolloid

    Noboru Suzuki;Patricia A. Labosky;Yasuhide Furuta;Linda Hargett

  • Requirement for Foxd3 in the maintenance of neural crest progenitors

    Lu Teng;Nathan A. Mundell;Audrey Y. Frist;Qiaohong Wang

  • SULF1 and SULF2 regulate heparan sulfate-mediated GDNF signaling for esophageal innervation

    Xingbin Ai;Toshio Kitazawa;Anh Tri Do;Marion Kusche-Gullberg

  • BMP signaling is essential for development of skeletogenic and neurogenic cranial neural crest.

    Benoît Kanzler;Ruth K. Foreman;Patricia A. Labosky;Moisés Mallo

  • The Pem homeobox gene is X-linked and exclusively expressed in extraembryonic tissues during early murine development.

    Tzu-Ping Lin;Patricia A. Labosky;Laura B. Grabel;Christine A. Kozak

  • Identification of Arx transcriptional targets in the developing basal forebrain

    Carl T. Fulp;Ginam Cho;Eric D. Marsh;Ilya M. Nasrallah

  • Neural crest stem cell multipotency requires Foxd3 to maintain neural potential and repress mesenchymal fates

    Nathan A. Mundell;Patricia A. Labosky

Frequent Co-Authors

Brigid L.M. Hogan
Brigid L.M. Hogan Duke University
Alvin C. Powers
Alvin C. Powers Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Jeffrey A. Golden
Jeffrey A. Golden Brigham and Women's Hospital
Agnes B. Fogo
Agnes B. Fogo Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Mark A. Magnuson
Mark A. Magnuson Vanderbilt University
Chaya Kalcheim
Chaya Kalcheim Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Martyn Goulding
Martyn Goulding Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Eric D. Marsh
Eric D. Marsh Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Denise P. Barlow
Denise P. Barlow Austrian Academy of Sciences
Klaus H. Kaestner
Klaus H. Kaestner University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Molecular Biology opens doors to diverse career options, but students may also benefit from related fields. With the rise of online education, many choose flexible learning paths that complement or enhance their main area of study. For example, an online mathematics degree can provide a strong analytical foundation, which is valuable in data-driven research settings.

For those interested in merging science with visual communication, an online graphic design degree helps develop skills useful for creating scientific illustrations and presentations. Interdisciplinary knowledge is also in high demand, and affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees offer the flexibility to shape a curriculum around multiple interests, including Molecular Biology, to broaden your career prospects.

For those considering teaching or research in the context of science history or bioethics, obtaining a specialized graduate degree such as an online history master's degree can be especially useful. These related online programs expand your career pathways and make you adaptable in a rapidly evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia A. Labosky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles