World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 113 4859 4559 185 181 447 61284

Jacqueline M. Dekker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacqueline M. Dekker between 1958 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacqueline M. Dekker published across 64 years, from 1958 to 2021, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2013. 4 of the 454 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2013. 1958: 2 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications
1958 2021

454 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacqueline M. Dekker: publications per year, 1958 to 2021
Year Publications
1958 2
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 3
1994 5
1995 3
1996 7
1997 3
1998 7
1999 12
2000 14
2001 6
2002 16
2003 26
2004 24
2005 20
2006 17
2007 15
2008 21
2009 31
2010 24
2011 25
2012 34
2013 41
2014 24
2015 18
2016 11
2017 14
2018 15
2019 6
2020 2
2021 2
Total 454
Download as CSV

Jacqueline M. Dekker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline M. Dekker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 447 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 447
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jacqueline M. Dekker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline M. Dekker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399 113
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Type 2 diabetes

Her primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes mellitus, Type 2 diabetes and Surgery. As part of her studies on Internal medicine, she frequently links adjacent subjects like Cardiology. Her research in Diabetes mellitus intersects with topics in Gastroenterology and Confidence interval.

Her work carried out in the field of Type 2 diabetes brings together such families of science as Homocysteine, Microalbuminuria, Quality of life and Glycemic. The various areas that Jacqueline M. Dekker examines in her Surgery study include Diabetic angiopathy, Type 1 diabetes, Cause of death and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Her Risk factor research includes elements of Incidence, Cohort study, Relative risk, Hazard ratio and Prospective cohort study.

Her most cited work include:

  • Global Prevalence and Major Risk Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy (2033 citations)
  • Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. (1110 citations)
  • Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people with severe mental illness position statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (654 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes mellitus, Type 2 diabetes and Cardiology. Her research links Surgery with Internal medicine. The study incorporates disciplines such as Prospective cohort study, Gerontology, Cohort and Hazard ratio in addition to Diabetes mellitus.

Her work in Type 2 diabetes addresses issues such as Physical therapy, which are connected to fields such as Randomized controlled trial. Her Cardiology research includes themes of Arterial stiffness and Heart rate. Her study in Body mass index is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Odds ratio and Metabolic syndrome.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (79.55%)
  • Endocrinology (52.92%)
  • Diabetes mellitus (45.13%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (79.55%)
  • Diabetes mellitus (45.13%)
  • Endocrinology (52.92%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jacqueline M. Dekker mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Endocrinology, Type 2 diabetes and Cohort. Her Internal medicine study combines topics in areas such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiology. The concepts of her Diabetes mellitus study are interwoven with issues in Distress and Insulin.

Her study brings together the fields of Population study and Endocrinology. Her Type 2 diabetes research incorporates themes from Carbohydrate metabolism, Epidemiology, Heart failure and Confidence interval. Her studies in Cohort integrate themes in fields like Gerontology, Glycemic, Depression, Waist and Confounding.

Between 2013 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? (481 citations)
  • Local Stiffness of the Carotid and Femoral Artery Is Associated With Incident Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality: The Hoorn Study (172 citations)
  • Vitamin D and mortality: Individual participant data meta-analysis of standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 26916 individuals from a European consortium (169 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Gene

Jacqueline M. Dekker focuses on Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes mellitus, Insulin resistance and Disease. Her Internal medicine study typically links adjacent topics like Cardiology. Her Cardiology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Stroke and Femoral artery.

Her biological study deals with issues like Gastroenterology, which deal with fields such as Ambulatory blood pressure, Blood pressure, Cholecalciferol, Hemoglobin A and Plasma glucose. She studies Type 2 diabetes which is a part of Diabetes mellitus. Her study in the field of Cardiovascular mortality is also linked to topics like In patient.

Best Publications

  • Global Prevalence and Major Risk Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy

    Joanne W.Y. Yau;Sophie L. Rogers;Ryo Kawasaki;Ecosse L. Lamoureux;Ecosse L. Lamoureux

  • Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham risk score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: A meta-analysis

    F.G.R. Fowkes;G.D. Murray;I. Butcher;C.L. Heald

  • Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'.

    Francesco U. S. Mattace-Raso;Albert Hofman;Germaine C. Verwoert;Jacqueline C. M. Witteman

  • Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic?

    Kevin D. Cashman;Kirsten G. Dowling;Zuzana Skrabakova;Marcela Gonzalez-Gross;Marcela Gonzalez-Gross

  • Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality - Comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria

    K. Borch-Johnsen;A. Neil;B. Balkau;S. Larsen

  • C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen, and Cardiovascular Disease Prediction

    Stephen Kaptoge;Emanuele Di Angelantonio;Lisa Pennells;Angela M. Wood

  • Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people with severe mental illness position statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    M. De Hert;J.M. Dekker;D. Wood;K.G. Kahl

  • Low Heart Rate Variability in a 2-Minute Rhythm Strip Predicts Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Mortality From Several Causes The ARIC Study

    Jacqueline M. Dekker;Richard S. Crow;Aaron R. Folsom;Peter J. Hannan

  • Adiposity in relation to vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone levels : a population-based study in older men and women

    Marieke B. Snijder;Rob M. van Dam;Marjolein Visser;Dorly J. H. Deeg

  • Metabolic Syndrome and 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Hoorn Study

    Jacqueline M. Dekker;Cynthia Girman;Thomas Rhodes;Giel Nijpels

  • Moderate alcohol consumption lowers the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

    Lando L.J. Koppes;Jacqueline M. Dekker;Henk F.J. Hendriks;Lex M. Bouter

  • Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction A Meta-analysis

    Hester M. den Ruijter;Sanne A.E. Peters;Todd J. Anderson;Annie R. Britton

  • QT interval prolongation predicts cardiovascular mortality in an apparently healthy population.

    E G Schouten;J M Dekker;P Meppelink;F J Kok

  • Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: The Hoorn Study.

    F. de Vegt;J.M. Dekker;A. Jager;E. Hienkens

  • Mild renal insufficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality: The Hoorn Study.

    Ronald M.A. Henry;Piet J. Kostense;Griët Bos;Jacqueline M. Dekker

  • Age- and sex-specific prevalences of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 13 European cohorts

    J. Tuomilehto;J. Lindstrom;S. Keinanen-Kiukaanniemie;L. Hiltunen

  • Heart Rate Variability from Short Electrocardiographic Recordings Predicts Mortality from All Causes in Middle-aged and Elderly Men The Zutphen Study

    Jacqueline M. Dekker;Evert G. Schouten;Peter Klootwijk;Jan Pool

  • Impaired Autonomic Function Is Associated With Increased Mortality, Especially in Subjects With Diabetes, Hypertension, or a History of Cardiovascular Disease: The Hoorn Study

    Jeanet Gerritsen;Jacqueline M. Dekker;Ben J. TenVoorde;Piet J. Kostense

  • Associations of hip and thigh circumferences independent of waist circumference with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study

    Marieke B Snijder;Jacqueline M Dekker;Marjolein Visser;Lex M Bouter

  • Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy.

    Olubukola Ajala;Patrick English;Jonathan Pinkney;Joanne W Y Yau

Frequent Co-Authors

Giel Nijpels
Giel Nijpels VU University Medical Center
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University
Robert J. Heine
Robert J. Heine VU University Medical Center
Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Stefan Pilz
Stefan Pilz Medical University of Graz
Casper G. Schalkwijk
Casper G. Schalkwijk Maastricht University
Marjolein Visser
Marjolein Visser Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jacob C. Seidell
Jacob C. Seidell Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Michaela Diamant
Michaela Diamant VU University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering alternative routes in healthcare, there are flexible online degree options available beyond the traditional MD pathway. These online programs offer career advancement and diversification within the medical field, often with more accessible entry and cost-effective tuition.

Healthcare management is a growing area—an online health management degree can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other care facilities. For those seeking a higher credential, the cheapest mha programs offer advanced knowledge in health systems administration without the need for long-term campus commitments.

Clinical professionals aiming to practice at the highest levels may consider the cheapest dnp programs online, which focus on nursing leadership and advanced clinical practice. Alternatively, if pharmacy interests you, the cheapest online pharmacy school programs provide a flexible path to earn a respected doctoral degree in pharmacy.

All these accredited online degrees are designed to accommodate working professionals and international students, making it easier to gain high-quality healthcare education while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jacqueline M. Dekker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles