World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1657 1487 89 77 199 20731
Neuroscience 77 1848 1685 107 97 198 20655

Daniel Ansari publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Ansari between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Ansari published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2019. 16 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2019. 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 10 publications
2002 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Ansari: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 4
2003 2
2004 0
2005 4
2006 8
2007 6
2008 9
2009 10
2010 15
2011 10
2012 12
2013 11
2014 10
2015 8
2016 16
2017 14
2018 10
2019 21
2020 14
2021 15
2022 17
2023 11
2024 6
2025 10
Total 243
Download as CSV

Daniel Ansari publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Ansari sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 199
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Ansari D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Ansari sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel Ansari is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and mathematics, with a notable focus on the intersections between cognitive processes and numerical cognition.

Their main areas of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Mathematics

Within these disciplines, Ansari's work delves into several subfields, such as:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Ansari's research topics cover diverse themes, including:

  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Disentangling the individual and contextual effects of math anxiety: A global perspective" (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample" (2022), Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003)" (2020), Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "The neural correlates of retrieval and procedural strategies in mental arithmetic: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis" (2022), Human Brain Mapping
  • "Domain-general and domain-specific influences on emerging numerical cognition: Contrasting uni-and bidirectional prediction models" (2021), Cognition

Frequent publication venues for Ansari include:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Cognition
  • Developmental Psychology

Some frequent coauthors collaborating with Ansari are:

  • Nathan T. T. Lau
  • H. Moriah Sokolowski
  • L. Peters
  • Eric D. Wilkey
  • Ian M. Lyons

Best Publications

  • Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain

    Daniel Ansari

  • Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement.

    Ian D. Holloway;Daniel Ansari

  • How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior

    Bert De Smedt;Marie-Pascale Noel;Camilla K. Gilmore;Daniel Ansari

  • Bridges over troubled waters: education and cognitive neuroscience

    Daniel Ansari;Donna Coch

  • Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental disorders.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Dagmara Annaz;Daniel Ansari;Gaia Scerif

  • Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia

    Gavin R. Price;Ian Holloway;Pekka Räsänen;Manu Vesterinen

  • To retrieve or to calculate? Left angular gyrus mediates the retrieval of arithmetic facts during problem solving

    Roland H. Grabner;Daniel Ansari;Karl Koschutnig;Gernot Reishofer

  • Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults.

    Daniel Ansari;Nicolas Garcia;Elizabeth Lucas;Kathleen Hamon

  • Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten.

    Clancy Blair;C. Cybele Raver

  • Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1–6

    Ian M. Lyons;Gavin R. Price;Anniek Vaessen;Leo Blomert

  • Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation

    Roland H. Grabner;Daniel Ansari;Gernot Reishofer;Elsbeth Stern

  • Age-related Changes in the Activation of the Intraparietal Sulcus during Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing: An Event-related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Daniel Ansari;Bibek Dhital

  • Atypical development of language and social communication in toddlers with Williams syndrome

    Emma Laing;George Butterworth;Daniel Ansari;Marisa Gsödl

  • How is phonological processing related to individual differences in children's arithmetic skills?

    Bert De Smedt;Jessica Taylor;Lisa Archibald;Daniel Ansari

  • Atypical trajectories of number development: a neuroconstructivist perspective

    Daniel Ansari;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field

    Daniel Ansari;Bert De Smedt;Roland H. Grabner

  • Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.

    Gavin R. Price;Daniel Palmer;Christian Battista;Daniel Ansari

  • Generation of novel motor sequences: the neural correlates of musical improvisation.

    Aaron L. Berkowitz;Daniel Ansari;Daniel Ansari

  • Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration

    Erin A. Maloney;Evan F. Risko;Daniel Ansari;Jonathan Fugelsang

  • Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Daniel Ansari;Victoria C. P. Knowland

  • What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development.

    Daniel Ansari;Chris Donlan;Michael S.C. Thomas;Sandra A. Ewing

Frequent Co-Authors

Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Roland H. Grabner
Roland H. Grabner University of Graz
Bert De Smedt
Bert De Smedt KU Leuven
Michael S.C. Thomas
Michael S.C. Thomas Birkbeck, University of London
Gaia Scerif
Gaia Scerif University of Oxford
Michael W. L. Chee
Michael W. L. Chee National University of Singapore
Stephan Vogel
Stephan Vogel University of Graz
Jonathan A. Fugelsang
Jonathan A. Fugelsang University of Waterloo
Wim Fias
Wim Fias Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens a variety of career pathways within mental health, counseling, and related fields. Many students aspire to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), which requires meeting specific state licensure requirements. Requirements often include a graduate degree in counseling or a closely related field, supervised clinical hours, and passing state or national exams.

For example, the Kentucky licensed professional counselor requirements and Louisiana lpc licensure requirements outline the educational coursework and practicum hours needed before applying for state licensure. Similarly, Maine licensed professional counselor requirements and Maryland lpc licensure requirements provide state-specific guidelines for aspiring counselors.

Exploring accredited online psychology degrees can be a flexible and accessible way to meet these requirements. Students should always review the licensing pathways in their state and ensure their academic program is aligned with the necessary credentials to pursue a professional counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Ansari

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles