World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7144 6660 710 676 193 10400
Neuroscience 43 7309 6735 562 518 194 10412

Gaia Scerif publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gaia Scerif between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gaia Scerif published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 29 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 17 publications
2001 2025

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gaia Scerif: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 9
2010 5
2011 10
2012 12
2013 9
2014 6
2015 15
2016 11
2017 8
2018 12
2019 19
2020 19
2021 27
2022 20
2023 21
2024 12
2025 17
Total 249
Download as CSV

Gaia Scerif publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaia Scerif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 193 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 193
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gaia Scerif D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gaia Scerif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gaia Scerif is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care

Gaia Scerif has contributed to numerous academic papers published in frequent venues such as Infant and Child Development, Developmental Science, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Vision, and AIDS Care.

Some of the recent papers connected to their research interests include:

  • Publishing child development research from around the world: An unfair playing field resulting in most of the world's child population under-represented in research (2022, Infant and Child Development)
  • Domain-general and domain-specific influences on emerging numerical cognition: Contrasting uni-and bidirectional prediction models (2021, Cognition)
  • The neural correlates of inhibitory control in 10-month-old infants: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study (2022, NeuroImage)
  • Early-life stature, preschool cognitive development, schooling attainment, and cognitive functioning in adulthood: a prospective study in four birth cohorts (2022, The Lancet Global Health)
  • Fragile X syndrome: an overview of cause, characteristics, assessment and management (2020, Paediatrics and Child Health)

Gaia Scerif frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their common co-authors include Steven J. Howard, Rebecca Merkley, Catherine E. Draper, Caylee J. Cook, and Catherine Manning, with collaboration counts ranging between 10 and 14 publications each.

Best Publications

  • Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory

    Rebecca Bull;Gaia Scerif

  • Using developmental trajectories to understand developmental disorders.

    Michael S. C. Thomas;Dagmara Annaz;Daniel Ansari;Gaia Scerif

  • The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

    Dima Amso;Gaia Scerif

  • Task-related Default Mode Network modulation and inhibitory control in ADHD: effects of motivation and methylphenidate

    Elizabeth B. Liddle;Chris Hollis;Martin J. Batty;Madeleine J. Groom

  • Training attentional control and working memory - Is younger, better?

    Sam Wass;G. Scerif;Mark H. Johnson

  • Visual search in typically developing toddlers and toddlers with Fragile X or Williams syndrome

    Gaia Scerif;Gaia Scerif;Kim Cornish;John Wilding;Jon Driver

  • Neurocognitive outcomes of individuals with a sex chromosome trisomy: XXX, XYY, or XXY: a systematic review.

    Victoria Leggett;Patricia Jacobs;Patricia Jacobs;Kate Nation;I. Gaia Scerif

  • Cortical gray matter in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Martin J. Batty;Elizabeth B. Liddle;Alain Pitiot;Roberto Toro

  • TRACING SYNDROME-SPECIFIC TRAJECTORIES OF ATTENTION ACROSS THE LIFESPAN

    Kim Cornish;Gaia Scerif;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Double dissociations in developmental disorders? Theoretically misconceived, empirically dubious.

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Gaia Scerif;Daniel Ansari

  • Autism, language and communication in children with sex chromosome trisomies

    Dorothy V M Bishop;Patricia A Jacobs;Katherine Lachlan;Diana Wellesley

  • The Multiple Subfunctions of Attention: Differential Developmental Gateways to Literacy and Numeracy

    Ann Steele;Annette Karmiloff-Smith;Kim Marie Cornish;Gaia Scerif

  • Mitigating the effect of persistent postnatal depression on child outcomes through an intervention to treat depression and improve parenting: a randomised controlled trial

    AL Stein;AL Stein;E Netsi;PJ Lawrence;PJ Lawrence;PJ Lawrence;C Granger

  • Different approaches to relating genotype to phenotype in developmental disorders.

    Annette Karmiloff-Smith;G. Scerif;Michael S.C. Thomas

  • Social anxiety disorder in adolescence: How developmental cognitive neuroscience findings may shape understanding and interventions for psychopathology.

    Simone P.W. Haller;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Gaia Scerif;Jennifer Y.F. Lau

  • Maternal perinatal mental health and offspring academic achievement at age 16: the mediating role of childhood executive function.

    Rebecca M. Pearson;Rebecca M. Pearson;Marc H. Bornstein;Miguel Cordero;Gaia Scerif

  • Using developmental cognitive neuroscience to study behavioral and attentional control.

    Duncan E. Astle;Gaia Scerif

  • Associations of physical activity and gross motor skills with executive function in preschool children from low-income South African settings

    Caylee J. Cook;Steven J. Howard;Gaia Scerif;Rhian Twine

  • Effects of Motivation and Medication on Electrophysiological Markers of Response Inhibition in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Madeleine J. Groom;Gaia Scerif;Peter F. Liddle;Martin J. Batty

  • To Look or Not to Look? Typical and Atypical Development of Oculomotor Control

    Gaia Scerif;Annette Karmiloff-smith;Ruth Campos;Mayada Elsabbagh

  • What is the precise role of cognitive control in the development of a sense of number

    Rebecca Merkley;Gaia Scerif;Daniel Ansari

Frequent Co-Authors

Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Kim Cornish
Kim Cornish Monash University
Anthony M. Norcia
Anthony M. Norcia Stanford University
Alan Stein
Alan Stein University of Oxford
Jennifer Y. F. Lau
Jennifer Y. F. Lau Queen Mary University of London
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
Kathleen Kahn
Kathleen Kahn University of the Witwatersrand
Peter F. Liddle
Peter F. Liddle University of Nottingham
Kathrin Cohen Kadosh
Kathrin Cohen Kadosh University of Surrey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens the door to a range of educational and professional opportunities. For those considering flexible learning options, online programs offer a practical alternative to traditional degrees. It's important to research which majors lead to the best earning potential—some of the most lucrative majors include neuroscience, biomedical sciences, and engineering-related fields.

Budget-conscious students can also benefit from the best online colleges that accept fafsa, offering quality education at an affordable price and making financial aid widely accessible. For those seeking to quickly boost their qualifications, there are online certificate programs that pay well, providing specialized training that can complement a neuroscience background.

If you're looking for a less intensive route, some of the easiest online degree options can help you get started in healthcare or research without a heavy workload. No matter your goals, these pathways can help you launch or advance a rewarding career in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Gaia Scerif

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles