World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10478 9838 1003 958 450 32894

Chris Todd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris Todd between 1973 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris Todd published across 54 years, from 1973 to 2026, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2024. 25 of the 644 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2024. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 33 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
1973 2026

644 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris Todd: publications per year, 1973 to 2026
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 4
1980 0
1981 3
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 1
1986 5
1987 0
1988 4
1989 5
1990 0
1991 5
1992 2
1993 7
1994 7
1995 17
1996 7
1997 11
1998 16
1999 10
2000 11
2001 10
2002 19
2003 12
2004 20
2005 10
2006 21
2007 19
2008 17
2009 12
2010 20
2011 12
2012 26
2013 24
2014 24
2015 19
2016 21
2017 19
2018 21
2019 29
2020 20
2021 27
2022 26
2023 30
2024 33
2025 24
2026 1
Total 644
Download as CSV

Chris Todd publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 450 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 450
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Chris Todd D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Todd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Chris Todd is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their work is primarily situated within the field of medicine, with significant contributions across subfields such as physiology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, psychiatry and mental health, and geriatrics and gerontology.

The researcher's publications focus on several key topics including frailty in older adults, nutrition and health in aging, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, physical activity and health, balance, gait, and falls prevention, palliative care and end-of-life issues, as well as health disparities and outcomes.

Chris Todd has published extensively, with notable frequent venues including Age and Ageing, BMJ Open, PLoS ONE, BMC Geriatrics, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). This demonstrates a consistent presence in journals focused on aging, general medicine, and health sciences.

Some of the recent significant papers affiliated with Chris Todd's collaborative network include:

  • World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative, 2022, Age and Ageing
  • Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • The longitudinal relationship between loneliness, social isolation, and frailty in older adults in England: a prospective analysis, 2021, The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • Promotion of Physical Activity in Older People Using mHealth and eHealth Technologies: Rapid Review of Reviews, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Chris Todd frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Lisa McGarrigle
  • Helen Hawley-Hague
  • Barbara Hanratty
  • Elisabeth Boulton
  • Alex Hall

The scope of Chris Todd's research covers vital areas relevant to aging populations and clinical interventions, particularly focusing on improving health outcomes related to frailty, physical activity, and falls prevention among older adults.

Best Publications

  • Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)

    Lucy Yardley;Nina Beyer;Klaus Hauer;Gertrudis Kempen

  • The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL

    C. Bradley;C. Todd;T. Gorton;E. Symonds

  • The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling

    Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen;Lucy Yardley;Jolanda C. M. Van Haastregt;G. A. Rixt Zijlstra

  • Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

    Felsenberg D;Silman Aj;Lunt M

  • Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials

    Klaus Hauer;Sarah E. Lamb;Ellen C. Jorstad;Chris Todd

  • Quality of Life in Patients with Vertebral Fractures: Validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO)

    P. Lips;C. Cooper;D. Agnusdei;F. Caulin

  • Prediction of appropriate timing of palliative care for older adults with non-malignant life-threatening disease: a systematic review

    Peter A. Coventry;Gunn E. Grande;David A. Richards;Chris J. Todd

  • Older people's views of advice about falls prevention: a qualitative study

    L. Yardley;Margaret Donovan-Hall;Karen Francis;C. Todd

  • What are the main risk factors for falls amongst older people and what are the most effective interventions to prevent these falls? How should interventions to prevent falls be implemented?

    C. Todd;DA Skelton

  • Part 2: Home based family caregiving at the end of life: a comprehensive review of published qualitative research (1998 - 2008)

    Laura Funk;Kelli I Stajduhar;Caroline Toye;S. Aoun

  • Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the east Anglian audit.

    C J Todd;C J Freeman;C Camilleri-Ferrante;C R Palmer

  • Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs

    Stephen Barclay;Chris Todd;Ilora Finlay;Gunn Grande

  • Patient empowerment: The need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions

    Marion McAllister;Graham Dunn;Katherine Payne;Linda Davies

  • Evaluating complex interventions in End of Life Care: the MORECare Statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews

    Irene J Higginson;Catherine J Evans;Gunn Grande;Nancy Preston;Nancy Preston

  • Place of death and access to home care services: are certain patient groups at a disadvantage?

    G.E Grande;J.M Addington-Hall;C.J Todd

  • Older People's Views of Falls-Prevention Interventions in Six European Countries

    Lucy Yardley;Felicity L. Bishop;Nina Beyer;Klaus Hauer

  • Pre-operative Nutrition Support in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery.

    Sorrel Burden;Chris Todd;James Hill;Simon Lal

  • Stress in UK intensive care unit doctors

    S. Coomber;C. Todd;C. Todd;G. Park;P. Baxter

  • Determinants of incident vertebral fracture in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

    D.K. Roy;T.W. O'Neill;J.D. Finn;M. Lunt

  • World Health Organisation Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age

    A Kalache;D Fu;S Yoshida;W Al-Faisal

Frequent Co-Authors

Terence W. O'Neill
Terence W. O'Neill University of Manchester
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol
Alan J. Silman
Alan J. Silman University of Oxford
Irene J Higginson
Irene J Higginson King's College London
Anthony D. Woolf
Anthony D. Woolf Royal Cornwall Hospital
Mark Lunt
Mark Lunt University of Manchester
Gordon C Jayson
Gordon C Jayson University of Manchester
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
J S Reeve
J S Reeve University of Oxford
Olof Johnell
Olof Johnell Malmö University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in flexible routes to a medical career or supporting roles in healthcare, online nursing degrees can offer a valuable alternative. Modern programs provide rigorous training, allowing students to balance work, family, and studies—often in less time than traditional options.

Students seeking advanced practice roles may consider short dnp programs for a faster path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These programs suit experienced nurses who want to move quickly into leadership or clinical roles. For those prioritizing accessibility and flexibility, a wide range of dnp programs are available online, many designed to support students at varying educational backgrounds.

Entry-level positions like Licensed Practical Nurse are also achievable online. With a fastest lpn program, students can begin a healthcare career in under a year and gain vital experience for further study. Additionally, mental health care is a burgeoning field—nurses holding a BSN or MSN can explore direct, accredited msn to pmhnp online programs to become Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners.

Exploring these pathways can open numerous doors for those passionate about healthcare, yet seeking alternatives beyond the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles