World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11642 10950 1101 1053 407 34987

Terence W. O'Neill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Terence W. O'Neill between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Terence W. O'Neill published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 45 of the 485 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 26 publications
1986 2025

485 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Terence W. O'Neill: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 4
1990 3
1991 1
1992 3
1993 4
1994 5
1995 7
1996 6
1997 13
1998 3
1999 4
2000 4
2001 5
2002 14
2003 5
2004 11
2005 11
2006 10
2007 8
2008 8
2009 17
2010 23
2011 19
2012 21
2013 23
2014 20
2015 18
2016 29
2017 20
2018 15
2019 11
2020 22
2021 30
2022 22
2023 18
2024 19
2025 26
Total 485
Download as CSV

Terence W. O'Neill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terence W. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 407 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 407
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Terence W. O'Neill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terence W. O'Neill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Terence W. O'Neill is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rheumatology, General Health Professions, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

O'Neill has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in venues such as:

  • Lara D. Veeken
  • Age and Ageing
  • Osteoporosis International
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • NIHR Open Research

Recent papers include:

  • Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan, 2022, Osteoporosis International
  • EULAR recommendations for intra-articular therapies, 2021, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX, 2023, Osteoporosis International
  • Associations of Serum Testosterone and Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin With Incident Cardiovascular Events in Middle-Aged to Older Men, 2021, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Serum Testosterone is Inversely and Sex Hormone-binding Globulin is Directly Associated with All-cause Mortality in Men, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues such as:

  • Dirk Vanderschueren
  • Leen Antonio
  • Frederick C. W. Wu
  • Michael J. Cook
  • Zoé Paskins

Best Publications

  • Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants

    Bin Zhou;Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco;Goodarz Danaei;Leanne M Riley

  • Identification of late-onset hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly men.

    Frederick C.W. Wu;Abdelouahid Tajar;Jennifer M. Beynon;Stephen R. Pye

  • Predictive Value of BMD for Hip and Other Fractures

    Olof Johnell;John A Kanis;Anders Oden;Helena Johansson

  • THE PREVALENCE OF VERTEBRAL DEFORMITY IN EUROPEAN MEN AND WOMEN: THE EUROPEAN VERTEBRAL OSTEOPOROSIS STUDY

    T. W. O'Neill;D. Felsenberg;J. Varlow;C. Cooper

  • Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis disruptions in older men are differentially linked to age and modifiable risk factors: the European Male Aging Study.

    Frederick C W Wu;Abdelouahid Tajar;Stephen R Pye;Alan J Silman

  • Rising rural body-mass index is the main driver of the global obesity epidemic in adults

    Honor Bixby;James Bentham;Bin Zhou;Mariachiara Di Cesare

  • Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

    Felsenberg D;Silman Aj;Lunt M

  • Characteristics of Secondary, Primary, and Compensated Hypogonadism in Aging Men: Evidence from the European Male Ageing Study.

    Abdelouahid Tajar;Gianni Forti;Terence W O'Neill;David M Lee

  • Age-related changes in general and sexual health in middle-aged and older men: results from the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS).

    Giovanni Corona;David M. Lee;Gianni Forti;Daryl B. O'Connor

  • A meta-analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women

    Helena Johansson;John A. Kanis;Anders Odén;Eugene McCloskey

  • Age-associated changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular function in middle-aged and older men are modified by weight change and lifestyle factors: longitudinal results from the European Male Ageing Study

    E M Camacho;I T Huhtaniemi;T W O'Neill;J D Finn

  • Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: a pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants

    Andrea Rodriguez-Martinez;Bin Zhou;Marisa K. Sophiea;James Bentham

  • Number and type of vertebral deformities: Epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss

    A. A. Ismail;C. Cooper;D. Felsenberg;J. Varlow

  • Characteristics of Androgen Deficiency in Late-Onset Hypogonadism: Results from the European Male Aging Study (EMAS)

    Abdelouahid Tajar;Ilpo T Huhtaniemi;Terence W O'Neill;Joseph D Finn

  • Incidence of distal forearm fracture in British men and women

    T. W. O'Neill;C. Cooper;J. D. Finn;M. Lunt

  • Update on the epidemiology, risk factors and disease outcomes of osteoarthritis

    Terence W. O'Neill;Paul S. McCabe;John McBeth

  • Sarcopenia and its relationship with bone mineral density in middle-aged and elderly European men

    Sabine Verschueren;Evelien Gielen;T W O'Neill;S R Pye

  • The epidemiology of vertebral fractures

    Colin Cooper;T. O'Neill;A. Silman

  • Determinants of incident vertebral fracture in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

    D.K. Roy;T.W. O'Neill;J.D. Finn;M. Lunt

  • Mortality associated with vertebral deformity in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

    A. A. Ismail;T. W. O'Neill;C. Cooper;J. D. Finn

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan J. Silman
Alan J. Silman University of Oxford
Frederick C. W. Wu
Frederick C. W. Wu University of Manchester
Ilpo Huhtaniemi
Ilpo Huhtaniemi Imperial College London
Felipe F. Casanueva
Felipe F. Casanueva University of Santiago de Compostela
Aleksander Giwercman
Aleksander Giwercman Lund University
Gianni Forti
Gianni Forti University of Florence
Steven Boonen
Steven Boonen KU Leuven
Michael E. J. Lean
Michael E. J. Lean University of Glasgow
David T. Felson
David T. Felson Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not ready for medical school? The USA offers a wide range of flexible online degree programs to help you explore alternative career options in the medical field. Many of these pathways make it easier for working professionals and students to balance their studies with other commitments.

For nurses seeking advancement, adn to np bridge programs offer a streamlined route to become a nurse practitioner without starting from scratch. If you want to specialize in holistic health, earning a nutritionist online degree equips you for careers in nutrition counseling, wellness, and allied health roles.

For those drawn to leadership and management, consider the best online mha programs to grow your expertise in healthcare administration. If you are an RN seeking to enhance your qualifications, online rn to bsn programs without clinicals can help you earn your bachelor’s degree on a flexible schedule.

These online pathways can open new doors in healthcare, public health, administration, and beyond, offering high-quality education while maintaining work-life balance.

Best Scientists Citing Terence W. O'Neill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles