World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco

Michèle M.M. Mazzocco

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4006 3694 2246 2023 148 13999

Michèle M.M. Mazzocco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michèle M.M. Mazzocco between 1992 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michèle M.M. Mazzocco published across 33 years, from 1992 to 2024, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2007. 5 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2007. 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications
1992 2024

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco: publications per year, 1992 to 2024
Year Publications
1992 4
1993 4
1994 5
1995 4
1996 2
1997 7
1998 7
1999 10
2000 1
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 3
2006 8
2007 12
2008 7
2009 7
2010 4
2011 4
2012 2
2013 9
2014 2
2015 2
2016 9
2017 6
2018 1
2019 3
2020 7
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
Total 152
Download as CSV

Michèle M.M. Mazzocco publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michèle M.M. Mazzocco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michèle M.M. Mazzocco D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michèle M.M. Mazzocco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michèle M.M. Mazzocco is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, Mathematics, and Psychology, with significant focus on Education, Statistics and Probability, and Developmental and Educational Psychology as subfields.

The core research themes explored in their work include:

  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Mathematics education and teaching techniques
  • Reading and literacy development
  • Early childhood education and development
  • Education methods and practices
  • School choice and performance
  • Parental involvement in education

Their publication record features recent research contributions such as:

  • "Relational language influences young children's number relation skills" (2022) published in Child Development
  • "The Effect of Peer-Assisted Mathematics Learning Opportunities in First Grade Classrooms: What Works for Whom?" (2020) published in Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • "Executive function and mathematics in preschool children: Training and transfer effects" (2023) published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • "Supporting Young Children's Development of Executive Function Through Early Mathematics" (2021) published in Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "The mediating role of attention in the association between math anxiety and math performance: An eye-tracking study." (2022) published in Journal of Educational Psychology

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include:

  • Jenny Yun-Chen Chan
  • Jasmine R. Ernst
  • Emily R. Padrutt
  • Sarah L. Lukowski
  • Rachel Olson

Mazzocco's work often appears in publication venues such as:

  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Child Development
  • Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
  • Journal of Educational Psychology

Best Publications

  • Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement

    Justin Halberda;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Lisa Feigenson

  • Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia).

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

  • Preschoolers' precision of the approximate number system predicts later school mathematics performance.

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

  • Kindergarten Predictors of Math Learning Disability

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Richard E. Thompson

  • Complexities in Identifying and Defining Mathematics Learning Disability in the Primary School-Age Years

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Gwen F. Myers

  • Cognitive Characteristics of Children With Mathematics Learning Disability (MLD) Vary as a Function of the Cutoff Criterion Used to Define MLD

    Melissa M. Murphy;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Laurie B. Hanich;Martha C. Early

  • A longitudinal assessment of executive function skills and their association with math performance.

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Sara T. Kover;Sara T. Kover

  • Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus

    J. Hale;V. Alfonso;V. Berninger;B. Bracken

  • Why is math so hard for some children? : the nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities

    Daniel B. Berch;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco

  • Is Math Anxiety Always Bad for Math Learning? The Role of Math Motivation

    Zhe Wang;Sarah L. Lukowski;Sara A. Hart;Ian M. Lyons

  • A longitudinal analysis of sex differences in math and spatial skills in primary school age children.

    Jennifer A. Lachance;Michèle M.M. Mazzocco;Michèle M.M. Mazzocco

  • Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties.

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco

  • Parts and 'holes': gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities.

    Michèle M.M. Mazzocco;Kathleen T. Devlin

  • Dyscalculia from a developmental and differential perspective

    Liane Kaufmann;Michèle M. Mazzocco;Ann Dowker;Michael von Aster;Michael von Aster;Michael von Aster

  • High functioning fragile X males: Demonstration of an unmethylated fully expanded FMR‐1 mutation associated with protein expression

    Randi J Hagerman;C. E. Hull;J. F. Safanda;I. Carpenter

  • Decreased cerebellar posterior vermis size in fragile X syndrome: Correlation with neurocognitive performance

    S. H. Mostofsky;Michele M Mazzocco;Michele M Mazzocco;G. Aakalu;I. S. Warsofsky

  • Math Learning Disability and Math LD Subtypes Evidence from Studies of Turner Syndrome, Fragile X Syndrome, and Neurofibromatosis Type 1

    Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco

  • Why Mental Arithmetic Counts: Brain Activation during Single Digit Arithmetic Predicts High School Math Scores

    Gavin R. Price;Michèle M.M. Mazzocco;Michèle M.M. Mazzocco;Daniel Ansari

  • The neurocognitive phenotype of female carriers of fragile X: additional evidence for specificity.

    Michele M.M. Mazzocco;Bruce F. Pennington;Randi J. Hagerman

  • Neurodevelopmental effects of X monosomy: A volumetric imaging study

    Allan L. Reiss;Allan L. Reiss;Michèle M.M. Mazzocco;Michèle M.M. Mazzocco;Ronald Greenlaw;Lisa S. Freund

  • Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability

    Michele M Mazzocco;L Feigenson;J Halberda

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University
Judith L. Ross
Judith L. Ross Thomas Jefferson University
Martha B. Denckla
Martha B. Denckla Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Randi J Hagerman
Randi J Hagerman University of California, Davis
Yulia Kovas
Yulia Kovas Goldsmiths University of London
Stephen A. Petrill
Stephen A. Petrill The Ohio State University
Michael McCloskey
Michael McCloskey Johns Hopkins University
Lisa Feigenson
Lisa Feigenson Johns Hopkins University
Justin Halberda
Justin Halberda Johns Hopkins University
Carol McDonald Connor
Carol McDonald Connor University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a Psychology degree in the USA, online education opens up a range of flexible and accessible career options. Many psychology graduates pursue related fields such as social work, mental health counseling, or behavioral sciences. Online programs can be particularly beneficial for those seeking a balance between education, work, and personal commitments.

If you’re looking for the easiest online social work degrees in the US, you’ll find programs that emphasize flexibility and support, making it easier for students to complete their studies at their own pace. For those seeking to finish their degrees in less time, check out fastest online social work bachelor's degree programs in America to fast-track your career entry.

Location-specific options are also available. Students in the Southwest can pursue accelerated online social work programs in Arizona, while those in the West Coast might consider accelerated online social work programs in California. These accelerated tracks help students jumpstart rewarding careers in social and community services, mental health support, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Michèle M.M. Mazzocco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles