World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6420
World Ranking
9452
National Ranking
5007

Melissa E. Libertus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa E. Libertus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Melissa E. Libertus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa E. Libertus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Melissa E. Libertus is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Social Sciences, Mathematics, and Psychology. Within these broad domains, Libertus has published extensively in subfields such as Education, Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Automotive Engineering.

Libertus's work addresses several core topics, with significant focus on cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, early childhood education and development, parental involvement in education, reading and literacy development, mathematics education and teaching techniques, education methods and practices, and child and animal learning development.

Their publication record includes notable papers such as:

  • "Screen Time in the Coronavirus 2019 Era: International Trends of Increasing Use Among 3- to 7-Year-Old Children" (2021, The Journal of Pediatrics)
  • "Parents' use of number talk with young children: Comparing methods, family factors, activity contexts, and relations to math skills" (2020, Early Childhood Research Quarterly)
  • "When beliefs matter most: Examining children's math achievement in the context of parental math anxiety" (2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology)
  • "Understanding the unique contributions of home numeracy, inhibitory control, the approximate number system, and spontaneous focusing on number for children's math abilities" (2020, Mathematical Thinking and Learning)
  • "Environmental influences on mathematics performance in early childhood" (2022, Nature Reviews Psychology)

Frequent co-authors in Libertus's research include Leanne Elliott, Heather J. Bachman, Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal, Alex M. Silver, and Shirley Duong.

Their contributions appear regularly in several publication venues, among which the most common are:

  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • Learning and Instruction
  • Journal of Numerical Cognition

Best Publications

  • Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability

    Melissa E. Libertus;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

  • Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood

    Ariel Starr;Melissa E. Libertus;Melissa E. Libertus;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing

    Melissa E Libertus;Marty G Woldorff;Elizabeth M Brannon

  • The neural development of an abstract concept of number

    Jessica F. Cantlon;Melissa E. Libertus;Philippe Pinel;Stanislas Dehaene

  • Is Approximate Number Precision a Stable Predictor of Math Ability

    Melissa E. Libertus;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

  • Links Between the Intuitive Sense of Number and Formal Mathematics Ability.

    Lisa Feigenson;Melissa E. Libertus;Justin Halberda

  • Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy

    Melissa E. Libertus;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations.

    Darko Odic;Melissa E. Libertus;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

  • Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination

    Melissa E. Libertus;Darko Odic;Justin Halberda

  • The General Movement Assessment Helps Us to Identify Preterm Infants at Risk for Cognitive Dysfunction.

    Christa Einspieler;Arend F. Bos;Melissa E. Libertus;Peter B. Marschik

  • Inhibitory control may not explain the link between approximation and math abilities in kindergarteners from middle class families

    Leanne Keller;Melissa Libertus

  • Behavioral and Neural Basis of Number Sense in Infancy

    Melissa E. Libertus;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Electrophysiological measures of time processing in infant and adult brains: Weber's law holds

    Elizabeth M. Brannon;Melissa E. Libertus;Warren H. Meck;Marty G. Woldorff

  • Numerical approximation abilities correlate with and predict informal but not formal mathematics abilities.

    Melissa E. Libertus;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

  • Understanding sources of individual variability in parents’ number talk with young children

    Leanne Elliott;Emily J. Braham;Melissa E. Libertus

  • Number trumps area for 7-month-old infants.

    Melissa E. Libertus;Ariel Starr;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • No intrinsic gender differences in children's earliest numerical abilities.

    Alyssa J. Kersey;Alyssa J. Kersey;Emily J. Braham;Kelsey D. Csumitta;Melissa E. Libertus

  • Comment on “Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures”

    Jessica F. Cantlon;Jessica F. Cantlon;Sara Cordes;Melissa E. Libertus;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Infants Show Ratio-dependent Number Discrimination Regardless of Set Size

    Ariel B Starr;Melissa E Libertus;Elizabeth M Brannon

  • The precision of mapping between number words and the approximate number system predicts children's formal math abilities.

    Melissa E. Libertus;Melissa E. Libertus;Darko Odic;Darko Odic;Lisa Feigenson;Justin Halberda

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin Halberda
Justin Halberda Johns Hopkins University
Lisa Feigenson
Lisa Feigenson Johns Hopkins University
Elizabeth M. Brannon
Elizabeth M. Brannon University of Pennsylvania
Jessica F. Cantlon
Jessica F. Cantlon Carnegie Mellon University
Marty G. Woldorff
Marty G. Woldorff Duke University
Kevin A. Pelphrey
Kevin A. Pelphrey University of Virginia
Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal
Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal University of Pittsburgh
Peter B. Marschik
Peter B. Marschik University of Göttingen
Christian D. Schunn
Christian D. Schunn University of Pittsburgh
Barbara Landau
Barbara Landau Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers, including specialized roles such as substance abuse counselor. This field is experiencing strong demand across the United States, but each location has unique certification requirements and pathways to licensure.

If you want to learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tucson, it’s important to understand state regulations, educational prerequisites, and hands-on training opportunities. Meanwhile, substance abuse counselor requirements in Tulsa may differ, often requiring specific coursework and supervised experience.

Candidates exploring Virginia Beach substance abuse counselors education requirements should also be aware of local licensing exams and internship criteria. Additionally, the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Washington DC involves distinct accreditation standards.

Online psychology degrees provide flexibility and can help you meet these regional requirements. Exploring your state’s guidelines and connecting your curriculum to local job markets is key to success in this growing and meaningful field.

Best Scientists Citing Melissa E. Libertus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles