World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6291
World Ranking
7690
National Ranking
56

Petro Julkunen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petro Julkunen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 183 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Petro Julkunen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petro Julkunen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Petro Julkunen is affiliated with the University of Eastern Finland in Finland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions to subfields such as Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
  • Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Vestibular and Auditory Disorders
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Julkunen has published extensively in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • Scientific Reports

Recent papers by Petro Julkunen include:

  • "Bridging the gap: TMS-EEG from lab to clinic", 2022, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
  • "TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis", 2023, Brain Stimulation
  • "Mapping of Motor Function with Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review on Clinical Application in Brain Tumors and Methods for Ensuring Feasible Accuracy", 2021, Brain Sciences
  • "Mechanobiological model for simulation of injured cartilage degradation via pro-inflammatory cytokines and mechanical stimulus", 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "Primary hand motor representation areas in healthy children, preadolescents, adolescents, and adults", 2020, NeuroImage

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Julkunen include:

  • Laura Säïsänen
  • Jusa Reijonen
  • Mervi Könönen
  • Petteri Nieminen
  • Sara Määttä

Best Publications

  • Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials.

    Petro Julkunen;Laura Säisänen;Nils Danner;Eini Niskanen

  • TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis

    Unknown

  • Factors influencing cortical silent period: optimized stimulus location, intensity and muscle contraction.

    Laura Säisänen;Eriikka Pirinen;Selja Teitti;Mervi Könönen

  • Motor potentials evoked by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.

    Laura Säisänen;Petro Julkunen;Eini Niskanen;Nils Danner

  • Novel parameters indicate significant differences in severity of obstructive sleep apnea with patients having similar apnea–hypopnea index

    Antti Kulkas;Pekka Tiihonen;Petro Julkunen;Esa Mervaala

  • Reproducibility in TMS–EEG studies: A call for data sharing, standard procedures and effective experimental control

    Paolo Belardinelli;Mana Biabani;Daniel M. Blumberger;Marta Bortoletto

  • Navigated TMS combined with EEG in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study.

    Petro Julkunen;Anne M. Jauhiainen;Susanna Westerén-Punnonen;Eriikka Pirinen

  • Methods for estimating cortical motor representation size and location in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Petro Julkunen

  • Does second-scale intertrial interval affect motor evoked potentials induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation?

    Petro Julkunen;Laura Säisänen;Taina Hukkanen;Nils Danner

  • Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold.

    Nils Danner;Petro Julkunen;Mervi Könönen;Laura Säisänen

  • Group-level variations in motor representation areas of thenar and anterior tibial muscles: Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.

    Eini Niskanen;Petro Julkunen;Laura Säisänen;Ritva Vanninen

  • Efficient reduction of stimulus artefact in TMS-EEG by epithelial short-circuiting by mini-punctures.

    P. Julkunen;A. Pääkkönen;T. Hukkanen;M Könönen

  • Mechanical characterization of articular cartilage by combining magnetic resonance imaging and finite-element analysis—a potential functional imaging technique

    P Julkunen;R K Korhonen;R K Korhonen;M J Nissi;J S Jurvelin

  • Mapping of Motor Function with Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review on Clinical Application in Brain Tumors and Methods for Ensuring Feasible Accuracy.

    Nico Sollmann;Sandro M. Krieg;Laura Säisänen;Petro Julkunen

  • Novel parameters for evaluating severity of sleep disordered breathing and for supporting diagnosis of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome

    A. Kulkas;P. Tiihonen;K. Eskola;P. Julkunen

  • Parallel input makes the brain run faster

    Tommi Raij;Jari Karhu;Dubravko Kicic;Dubravko Kicic;Pantelis Lioumis

  • Altered cortical inhibition in Unverricht-Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1).

    Nils Danner;Petro Julkunen;Jelena Khyuppenen;Taina Hukkanen

  • Bridging the gap: TMS-EEG from lab to clinic

    Unknown

  • Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography may contribute to assess the severity of Alzheimer's disease.

    Petro Julkunen;Anne M. Jauhiainen;Mervi Könönen;Ari Pääkkönen

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulation of corticospinal excitability by targeting cortical I-waves with biphasic paired-pulses.

    Elisa Kallioniemi;Petri Savolainen;Gustaf Järnefelt;Päivi Koskenkorva

  • Non-invasive preoperative localization of primary motor cortex in epilepsy surgery by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Laura Säisänen;Mervi Könönen;Petro Julkunen;Sara Määttä

  • TMS-EEG reveals impaired intracortical interactions and coherence in Unverricht-Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1).

    Petro Julkunen;Laura Säisänen;Mervi Könönen;Ritva Vanninen

  • Threshold curves for transcranial magnetic stimulation to improve reliability of motor pathway status assessment

    Petro Julkunen;Jarmo Ruohonen;Saara Sääskilahti;Laura Säisänen

Frequent Co-Authors

Mervi Könönen
Mervi Könönen University of Eastern Finland
Jari Karhu
Jari Karhu Nexstim (Finland)
Jukka S. Jurvelin
Jukka S. Jurvelin University of Eastern Finland
Rami K. Korhonen
Rami K. Korhonen University of Eastern Finland
Esa Mervaala
Esa Mervaala University of Eastern Finland
Juha Töyräs
Juha Töyräs University of Eastern Finland
Reetta Kälviäinen
Reetta Kälviäinen University of Eastern Finland
Timo A. Lakka
Timo A. Lakka University of Eastern Finland
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Jari Tiihonen
Jari Tiihonen Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of exciting and rewarding careers. Many students are now considering degrees that make the most money, and Neuroscience can be a stepping stone into high-paying roles in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, research, and technology.

For those seeking flexible learning options, there are fafsa-approved online certificate programs that make it easier to start your journey without the financial burden. Many of these programs touch on foundational scientific and health-related topics, providing a great entry point into the field.

Additionally, consider pursuing online certifications that pay well to quickly boost your skillset and employability within neuroscience or related fields such as data science, medical coding, or laboratory technology.

If you’re looking for an accessible pathway, some easy bachelor degrees online offer foundational knowledge that can later be specialized with advanced study or certifications. This approach can make it easier to balance study with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Petro Julkunen

Trending Scientists