World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stella F. Lourenco

Stella F. Lourenco

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5634
World Ranking
10151
National Ranking
5348

Stella F. Lourenco publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stella F. Lourenco sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stella F. Lourenco D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stella F. Lourenco sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stella F. Lourenco is a researcher affiliated with Emory University in the United States, whose work primarily focuses on neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience. Their research spans various subfields including statistics and probability, developmental and educational psychology, education, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their main areas of study incorporate cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, face recognition and perception, visual perception and processing mechanisms, child and animal learning development, visual attention and saliency detection, mathematics education and teaching techniques, as well as spatial cognition and navigation.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Stella F. Lourenco include:

  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • No Participant Left Behind: Conducting Science During COVID-19, 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Numerosity and cumulative surface area are perceived holistically as integral dimensions., 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Sixty years of gender representation in children's books: Conditions associated with overrepresentation of male versus female protagonists, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Skeletal representations of shape in the human visual cortex, 2021, Neuropsychologia

The venues where Lourenco frequently publishes include the Journal of Vision, with nine publications, followed by Cognition, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Frequent coauthors working alongside Lourenco are Vladislav Ayzenberg, Lauren S Aulet, Yaxin Liu, Kylee Novick, and June Gruber.

Best Publications

  • Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Sex Difference in Spatial Skill

    Susan C. Levine;Marina Vasilyeva;Stella F. Lourenco;Nora S. Newcombe

  • General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants

    Stella F. Lourenco;Matthew R. Longo

  • On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space.

    Matthew R. Longo;Stella F. Lourenco

  • The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: Evidence from the preschool years

    Justin W. Bonny;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence

    Stella F. Lourenco;Justin W. Bonny;Edmund P. Fernandez;Sonia Rao

  • Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression

    Matthew R. Longo;Stella F. Lourenco;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Sex differences in spatial cognition: advancing the conversation.

    Susan C. Levine;Alana Foley;Stella Lourenco;Stacy Ehrlich

  • The development of gender differences in spatial reasoning: A meta-analytic review.

    Jillian E. Lauer;Eukyung Yhang;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length.

    Matthew R. Longo;Matthew R. Longo;Stella F. Lourenco;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli

    Eleonora Vagnoni;Stella Lourenco;Matthew Longo

  • Near space and its relation to claustrophobic fear

    Stella F. Lourenco;Matthew R. Longo;Thanujeni Pathman

  • Transitive inference of social dominance by human infants

    Regina Paxton Gazes;Robert R. Hampton;Robert R. Hampton;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Common spatial organization of number and emotional expression: A mental magnitude line

    Kevin J. Holmes;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Spatial Processing in Infancy Predicts Both Spatial and Mathematical Aptitude in Childhood

    Jillian E. Lauer;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Development of spatial cognition

    Marina Vasilyeva;Stella F. Lourenco

  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science

    June Gruber;Jane Mendle;Kristen A. Lindquist;Toni Schmader

  • Origins and Development of Generalized Magnitude Representation

    Stella F. Lourenco;Matthew R. Longo

  • The plasticity of near space: Evidence for contraction

    Stella F. Lourenco;Matthew R. Longo

  • No Participant Left Behind: Conducting Science During COVID-19.

    Stella F. Lourenco;Arber Tasimi

  • Orienting numbers in mental space: Horizontal organization trumps vertical

    Kevin J. Holmes;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Representations of numerical and non-numerical magnitude both contribute to mathematical competence in children.

    Stella F. Lourenco;Justin W. Bonny

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew R. Longo
Matthew R. Longo Birkbeck, University of London
Janellen Huttenlocher
Janellen Huttenlocher University of Chicago
Susan C. Levine
Susan C. Levine University of Chicago
Robert R. Hampton
Robert R. Hampton Emory University
Philip David Zelazo
Philip David Zelazo University of Minnesota
Gregory S. Berns
Gregory S. Berns Emory University
Jessica F. Cantlon
Jessica F. Cantlon Carnegie Mellon University
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University
Deanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology unlocks many flexible career paths, especially with the growing availability of online programs. Those interested in becoming licensed counselors will need to meet specific education and licensing requirements, which can vary significantly across cities and states.

For example, if you want to learn how to become a licensed therapist in Kansas City or understand the Laredo licensed therapist education requirements, you’ll find that most jurisdictions require a graduate degree in counseling or a related field, supervised clinical experience, and successful completion of relevant exams.

Exploring how to become a licensed therapist in Las Vegas or satisfying the Lexington licensed therapist education requirements means you might also need to keep up with state-specific continuing education and renewal requirements. Many online degrees are structured to meet these needs and are ideal for students needing flexibility.

Whether you pursue clinical, counseling, or industrial-organizational psychology, researching local licensing pathways and accredited programs is key to building a successful and rewarding career in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Stella F. Lourenco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles