World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 58 3878 3576 415 395 196 12550
Neuroscience 58 4162 3818 369 337 201 12551

Matthew R. Longo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Longo between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Longo published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2025. 34 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2025. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 24 publications
2002 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Longo: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 10
2010 8
2011 8
2012 17
2013 8
2014 8
2015 18
2016 12
2017 17
2018 18
2019 21
2020 13
2021 14
2022 17
2023 14
2024 10
2025 24
Total 252
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Longo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Longo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 196
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Longo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Longo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 58
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew R. Longo is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their primary research focus spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with significant contributions in cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work addresses how humans perceive and process sensory information and body representations.

Their research prominently covers topics including tactile and sensory interactions, visual perception and processing mechanisms, action observation and synchronization, motor control and adaptation, face recognition and perception, multisensory perception and integration, and virtual reality applications and impacts.

Matthew R. Longo's frequent co-authors include Denise Cadete, Elena Azañón, Luigi Tamè, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, and Raffaele Tucciarelli, indicating active collaboration within the cognitive neuroscience community.

Their publications often appear in specialized journals where they have a consistent presence. Key publication venues for their work are:

  • Cognition
  • Perception
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Current Biology
  • Cortex

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthew R. Longo span important contributions in the understanding of body perception and sensory processing. Notable recent works include:

  • "Distortion of mental body representations," 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Explicit and Implicit Own's Body and Space Perception in Painful Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Scoping Review," 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "No specific relationship between hypnotic suggestibility and the rubber hand illusion," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "The Self in the Mind's Eye: Revealing How We Truly See Ourselves Through Reverse Correlation," 2021, Psychological Science
  • "Reconstructing neural representations of tactile space," 2021, NeuroImage

The scientist's work reflects a detailed inquiry into the nuances of body representation, multisensory integration, and perceptual processes. Their research employs experimental methods to explore how the mind constructs and adapts sensory and motor experiences, often utilizing advanced neuroimaging and psychophysical techniques.

Matthew R. Longo's sustained contributions over numerous publications indicate a focus on both fundamental mechanisms in neuroscience and applied perspectives in related fields such as human-computer interaction and virtual reality.

Best Publications

  • What is embodiment? A psychometric approach

    Matthew R. Longo;Friederike Schüür;Friederike Schüür;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Manos Tsakiris;Manos Tsakiris

  • More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex

    Matthew R. Longo;Elena Azañón;Elena Azañón;Patrick Haggard

  • An implicit body representation underlying human position sense

    Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • Having a body versus moving your body: neural signatures of agency and body-ownership.

    Manos Tsakiris;Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • General Magnitude Representation in Human Infants

    Stella F. Lourenco;Matthew R. Longo

  • On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space.

    Matthew R. Longo;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders.

    Ertimiss Eshkevari;Elizabeth Rieger;M R Longo;P Haggard

  • Visually induced analgesia: seeing the body reduces pain

    Matthew R. Longo;Viviana Betti;Salvatore M. Aglioti;Patrick Haggard

  • Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.

    Bennett I. Bertenthal;Matthew R. Longo;Adam Kosobud

  • Spatial sensory organization and body representation in pain perception.

    Patrick Haggard;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Matthew R. Longo

  • Visual Distortion of Body Size Modulates Pain Perception

    Flavia Mancini;Flavia Mancini;Matthew R. Longo;Matthew R. Longo;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Patrick Haggard

  • Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression

    Matthew R. Longo;Stella F. Lourenco;Stella F. Lourenco

  • The Posterior Parietal Cortex Remaps Touch into External Space

    Elena Azañón;Matthew R. Longo;Salvador Soto-Faraco;Salvador Soto-Faraco;Patrick Haggard

  • Owning an overweight or underweight body: distinguishing the physical, experienced and virtual body.

    Ivelina V. Piryankova;Hong Yu Wong;Sally A. Linkenauger;Catherine Stinson

  • Implicit body representations and the conscious body image

    Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • Persistent body image disturbance following recovery from eating disorders

    Ertimiss Eshkevari;Elizabeth Rieger;Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length.

    Matthew R. Longo;Matthew R. Longo;Stella F. Lourenco;Stella F. Lourenco

  • Self awareness and the body image

    Matthew R. Longo;Friederike Schüür;Friederike Schüür;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Manos Tsakiris;Manos Tsakiris

  • Weber's Illusion and Body Shape: Anisotropy of Tactile Size Perception on the Hand

    Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli

    Eleonora Vagnoni;Stella Lourenco;Matthew Longo

  • Linking pain and the body: neural correlates of visually induced analgesia.

    Matthew R. Longo;Gian Domenico Iannetti;Flavia Mancini;Jon Driver

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Stella F. Lourenco
Stella F. Lourenco Emory University
Bennett I. Bertenthal
Bennett I. Bertenthal Indiana University
Manos Tsakiris
Manos Tsakiris Royal Holloway University of London
Martin I. Sereno
Martin I. Sereno San Diego State University
Betty J. Mohler
Betty J. Mohler Amazon (United States)
Ayse Pinar Saygin
Ayse Pinar Saygin University of California, San Diego
Gian Domenico Iannetti
Gian Domenico Iannetti University College London
Salvador Soto-Faraco
Salvador Soto-Faraco Pompeu Fabra University
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees open pathways to a range of rewarding careers in mental health, education, research, and business. Whether you aspire to become a counselor, human resources specialist, or psychology researcher, studying online offers flexibility to balance education with your lifestyle.

Today, students can choose from a wide variety of accredited programs nationwide. For example, the best online psychology program rankings in San Diego and the best online psychology program rankings in Texas highlight regional institutions offering rigorous coursework and practical experiences.

If you're seeking a broader perspective, the comprehensive list of online psychology degrees in USA covers top-ranked schools across the nation, while online psychology degrees in Wisconsin focus on opportunities in the Midwest.

After graduation, careers in clinical work, school administration, or organizational psychology are all possible. Online degrees offer similar outcomes and rigorous education as traditional programs, helping students make a meaningful impact in their chosen fields.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Longo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles