World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
20850
World Ranking
3077
National Ranking
291

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
20713
World Ranking
2800
National Ranking
310

Manos Tsakiris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manos Tsakiris sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Manos Tsakiris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manos Tsakiris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Manos Tsakiris is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with significant contributions in cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, sociology and political science, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, action observation and synchronization, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, neural and behavioral psychology studies, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, face recognition and perception, and pain management and placebo effect.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Panagiotis Mitkidis, Ruben T. Azevedo, Gianluca Finotti, Lara Maister, and Mariana Von Mohr.

Among the typical publication venues for Manos Tsakiris are Biological Psychology, Nature Communications, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Cortex, and Trends in Neurosciences.

Notable recent papers by the scientist include:

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self, 2020, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Comment on "Zamariola et al. (2018), Interoceptive Accuracy Scores are Problematic: Evidence from Simple Bivariate Correlations"-The empirical data base, the conceptual reasoning and the analysis behind this statement are misconceived and do not support the authors' conclusions, 2020, Biological Psychology
  • Physical activity and interoceptive processing: Theoretical considerations for future research, 2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Computational and neurocognitive approaches to the political brain: key insights and future avenues for political neuroscience, 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Manos Tsakiris has also contributed to book publications, including the 2024 work "What determines green purchase behavior?" published by Frontiers Media.

The scientist's awards include becoming a Member of Academia Europaea in 2020.

Best Publications

  • The Rubber Hand Illusion Revisited: Visuotactile Integration and Self-Attribution.

    Manos Tsakiris;Patrick Haggard

  • My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership.

    Manos Tsakiris

  • What is embodiment? A psychometric approach

    Matthew R. Longo;Friederike Schüür;Friederike Schüür;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Marjolein P.M. Kammers;Manos Tsakiris;Manos Tsakiris

  • Neural Signatures of Body Ownership: A Sensory Network for Bodily Self-Consciousness

    Manos Tsakiris;Maike D. Hesse;Christian Boy;Patrick Haggard

  • Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership

    Manos Tsakiris;Gita Prabhu;Patrick Haggard

  • Just a heartbeat away from one's body: interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations

    Manos Tsakiris;Ana Tajadura Jiménez;Marcello Costantini

  • The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition

    Matthew A.J. Apps;Manos Tsakiris

  • On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections

    Manos Tsakiris;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Shaun Gallagher

  • The Experience of Agency Feelings, Judgments, and Responsibility

    Patrick Haggard;Manos Tsakiris

  • The multisensory basis of the self: From body to identity to others

    Manos Tsakiris

  • Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition

    Lara Maister;Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Maria V. Sanchez-Vives;Manos Tsakiris

  • Mentalizing homeostasis: The social origins of interoceptive inference

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Manos Tsakiris

  • Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects

    Manos Tsakiris;Lewis Carpenter;Dafydd James;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

  • Having a body versus moving your body: neural signatures of agency and body-ownership.

    Manos Tsakiris;Matthew R. Longo;Patrick Haggard

  • Looking for myself: current multisensory input alters self-face recognition.

    Manos Tsakiris

  • Being a Beast Machine: The Somatic Basis of Selfhood.

    Anil K. Seth;Manos Tsakiris;Manos Tsakiris

  • The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body

    Manos Tsakiris;Marcello Costantini;Patrick Haggard

  • ‘Bodily precision’: a predictive coding account of individual differences in interoceptive accuracy

    Vivien Ainley;Matthew A. J. Apps;Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Manos Tsakiris

  • Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health.

    Manos Tsakiris;Hugo Critchley

  • National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic

    Unknown

  • A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition.

    Manos Tsakiris;Patrick Haggard;Nicolas Franck;Nelly Mainy

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Aikaterini Fotopoulou University College London
Matthew R. Longo
Matthew R. Longo Birkbeck, University of London
Andrea Serino
Andrea Serino University Hospital of Lausanne
Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Simone Schütz-Bosbach Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hugo D. Critchley
Hugo D. Critchley Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Ryan McKay
Ryan McKay Royal Holloway University of London
Daniel Västfjäll
Daniel Västfjäll Linköping University
Michael D. Kopelman
Michael D. Kopelman King's College London
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open doors to a range of fulfilling careers in mental health care, counseling, and therapy. Many students are now exploring online psychology degrees, which provide the flexibility to balance studies with work or family commitments.

If you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist, there are important education and licensure steps to consider, which can vary by location. For example, learning how to become a licensed therapist in Arlington involves completing advanced degrees, gaining supervised clinical experience, and meeting state testing requirements.

The process of how to become a licensed therapist in Atlanta also requires graduate-level education and supervised practice hours, which are often supported by accredited online programs.

Understanding Aurora licensed therapist education requirements is crucial, as each state may have unique criteria for coursework and field experience.

If you're looking to start your career in Texas, consider what it takes for becoming a licensed therapist in Austin, where both traditional and online educational pathways can help you reach your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Manos Tsakiris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles