World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8620 8054 402 395 105 5733
Neuroscience 39 8353 7718 709 674 103 5733

Simone Schütz-Bosbach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Simone Schütz-Bosbach between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Simone Schütz-Bosbach published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 11 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
2006 2025

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Simone Schütz-Bosbach: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 6
2010 21
2011 16
2012 13
2013 6
2014 6
2015 3
2016 2
2017 3
2018 5
2019 5
2020 1
2021 5
2022 5
2023 5
2024 4
2025 7
Total 120
Download as CSV

Simone Schütz-Bosbach publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simone Schütz-Bosbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 103
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Simone Schütz-Bosbach D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simone Schütz-Bosbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Simone Schütz-Bosbach is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and works primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their research focuses on Cognitive Neuroscience, with additional contributions to Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The following are some of the main topics covered in their work:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Among frequent coauthors in Simone Schütz-Bosbach's research collaborations are:

  • Jakob Kaiser
  • Antje Gentsch
  • Qiaoyue Ren
  • Amanda C. Marshall
  • Maren Giersiepen

Publication venues where Simone Schütz-Bosbach has contributed multiple papers include:

  • NeuroImage
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Biological Psychology
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of Neuroscience

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Simone Schütz-Bosbach include:

  • Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Preparing for Success: Neural Frontal Theta and Posterior Alpha Dynamics during Action Preparation Predict Flexible Resolution of Cognitive Conflicts, 2022, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • From the inside out: Interoceptive feedback facilitates the integration of visceral signals for efficient sensory processing, 2022, NeuroImage
  • The Interplay Between Affective Processing and Sense of Agency During Action Regulation: A Review, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Multisensory integration of anticipated cardiac signals with visual targets affects their detection among multiple visual stimuli, 2022, NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception

    Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Wolfgang Prinz

  • On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections

    Manos Tsakiris;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Shaun Gallagher

  • The joint Simon effect: A review and theoretical integration

    Thomas Dolk;Thomas Dolk;Bernhard Hommel;Lorenza S. Colzato;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: a TMS investigation.

    Jan Stupacher;Jan Stupacher;Michael J. Hove;Giacomo Novembre;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception.

    Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross;Louise Kirsch;Luca Francesco Ticini;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • A New Look at Sensory Attenuation Action-Effect Anticipation Affects Sensitivity, Not Response Bias

    Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Pascal Mamassian;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Florian Waszak

  • The self in action effects: Selective attenuation of self-generated sounds

    Carmen Weiss;Arvid Herwig;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • How “Social” is the social Simon effect?

    Thomas Dolk;Bernhard Hommel;Lorenza S. Colzato;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • I did it: Unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature

    Antje Gentsch;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • Self and Other in the Human Motor System

    Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Benedetta Mancini;Salvatore Maria Aglioti;Patrick Haggard

  • Distinguishing Self and Other in Joint Action. Evidence from a Musical Paradigm

    Giacomo Novembre;Luca Francesco Ticini;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Peter E. Keller

  • Dysfunctional forward model mechanisms and aberrant sense of agency in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Antje Gentsch;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Tanja Endrass;Norbert Kathmann

  • Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action

    Giacomo Novembre;Luca Francesco Ticini;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Peter E. Keller;Peter E. Keller

  • Prospective coding in event representation

    Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Believing and perceiving: authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation.

    Andrea Desantis;Carmen Weiss;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak

  • Towards a common framework of grounded action cognition: Relating motor control, perception and cognition

    Antje Gentsch;Arne Weber;Matthis Synofzik;Gottfried Vosgerau

  • Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions

    Jakob Kaiser;Natalie Annette Simon;Paul Sauseng;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • Detection of visual-tactile contingency in the first year after birth

    Norbert Zmyj;Jana Jank;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Moritz M. Daum

  • The influence of visual training on predicting complex action sequences

    Emily S. Cross;Waltraud Stadler;Waltraud Stadler;Waltraud Stadler;Jim Parkinson;Jim Parkinson;Jim Parkinson;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Simone Schütz-Bosbach

  • Repetitive TMS suggests a role of the human dorsal premotor cortex in action prediction.

    Waltraud Stadler;Waltraud Stadler;Derek V. M. Ott;Anne Springer;Anne Springer;Ricarda Ines Schubotz

Frequent Co-Authors

Emily S. Cross
Emily S. Cross University of Glasgow
Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Peter E. Keller
Peter E. Keller University of Sydney
Florian Waszak
Florian Waszak Université Paris Cité
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Karsten Mueller
Karsten Mueller Max Planck Society
Manos Tsakiris
Manos Tsakiris Royal Holloway University of London
Roman Liepelt
Roman Liepelt University of Hagen
Norbert Kathmann
Norbert Kathmann Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Many students combine neuroscience with applied fields, opening further opportunities in mental health, social work, or research.

For those interested in counseling, earning an online masters in marriage and family therapy can provide essential skills for working with families and individuals facing neurological or psychological challenges.

Alternatively, pursuing an online masters in psychology can expand your understanding of human behavior and mental processes, providing a strong theoretical foundation that complements neuroscience studies.

If you're looking for flexibility, psychology degrees online offer a range of affordable and accessible options at both undergraduate and graduate levels. These programs can prepare you for roles in research, education, or mental health services.

Finally, a 1 year online master's in social work is a fast-track option for those wishing to address broader social and neurological issues in diverse communities. Exploring these related degrees can help you develop a versatile career in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Simone Schütz-Bosbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles