World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cosimo Urgesi

Cosimo Urgesi

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7217 6730 138 136 153 8462
Neuroscience 43 7348 6774 389 373 161 8507

Cosimo Urgesi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cosimo Urgesi between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cosimo Urgesi published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 30 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 16 publications
2004 2025

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cosimo Urgesi: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 2
2006 6
2007 2
2008 5
2009 3
2010 4
2011 5
2012 11
2013 11
2014 11
2015 7
2016 10
2017 7
2018 7
2019 11
2020 13
2021 13
2022 8
2023 20
2024 14
2025 16
Total 188
Download as CSV

Cosimo Urgesi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cosimo Urgesi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 153
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cosimo Urgesi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cosimo Urgesi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cosimo Urgesi is affiliated with the University of Udine in Italy and has made contributions across several interconnected fields of study. Their work primarily focuses on Neuroscience, Psychology, and Medicine, with research efforts covering subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Neurology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their research topics explore diverse areas including Action Observation and Synchronization, Vestibular and Auditory Disorders, Motor Control and Adaptation, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders, Face Recognition and Perception, as well as Infant Development and Preterm Care.

Recent publications by Cosimo Urgesi include:

  • A Neural Circuit for Spirituality and Religiosity Derived From Patients With Brain Lesions, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • How social is the cerebellum? Exploring the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the prediction of social and physical events, 2021, Brain Structure and Function
  • Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training Programs (CCTP) with Game-like Features in Children with or without Neuropsychological Disorders: a Meta-Analytic Investigation, 2020, Neuropsychology Review
  • Home-based cognitive training in pediatric patients with acquired brain injury: preliminary results on efficacy of a randomized clinical trial, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Virtual Reality Social Prediction Improvement and Rehabilitation Intensive Training (VR-SPIRIT) for paediatric patients with congenital cerebellar diseases: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial, 2020, Trials

Cosimo Urgesi frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Niccolò Butti, Alessandra Finisguerra, Viola Oldrati, Renato Borgatti, and Romina Romaniello.

Their work has been published in a range of venues, with notable contributions to Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Brain Sciences, NeuroImage, Scientific Reports, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players

    Salvatore M Aglioti;Paola Cesari;Michela Romani;Cosimo Urgesi

  • Mapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System

    Cosimo Urgesi;Valentina Moro;Matteo Candidi;Salvatore M. Aglioti

  • Controlling memory impairment in elderly adults using virtual reality memory training: a randomized controlled pilot study.

    Gabriele Optale;Cosimo Urgesi;Valentina Busato;Silvia Marin

  • Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex

    Cosimo Urgesi;Matteo Candidi;Silvio Ionta;Salvatore M Aglioti

  • The spiritual brain: selective cortical lesions modulate human self-transcendence

    Cosimo Urgesi;Salvatore M. Aglioti;Miran Skrap;Franco Fabbro

  • Simulating the Future of Actions in the Human Corticospinal System

    Cosimo Urgesi;Marta Maieron;Alessio Avenanti;Emmanuele Tidoni

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Two Cortical Pathways for Visual Body Processing

    Cosimo Urgesi;Beatriz Calvo-Merino;Patrick Haggard;Salvatore M. Aglioti

  • Magnetic stimulation of extrastriate body area impairs visual processing of nonfacial body parts

    Cosimo Urgesi;Giovanni Berlucchi;Salvatore M. Aglioti

  • Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players.

    A. M. Abreu;E. Macaluso;R. T. Azevedo;Paola Cesari

  • The Neural Basis of Body Form and Body Action Agnosia

    Valentina Moro;Cosimo Urgesi;Simone Pernigo;Paola Lanteri

  • Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence

    Alessio Avenanti;Matteo Candidi;Cosimo Urgesi

  • Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli.

    B Calvo-Merino;B Calvo-Merino;C Urgesi;Guido Orgs;S M Aglioti

  • Motor facilitation during action observation: topographic mapping of the target muscle and influence of the onlooker's posture.

    Cosimo Urgesi;Matteo Candidi;Franco Fabbro;Michela Romani

  • Corticospinal facilitation during first and third person imagery

    Alissa D. Fourkas;Alessio Avenanti;Cosimo Urgesi;Cosimo Urgesi;Salvatore M. Aglioti

  • Neuroanatomical substrates of action perception and understanding: an anatomic likelihood estimation meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping studies in brain injured patients

    Cosimo Urgesi;Matteo Candidi;Alessio Avenanti

  • Neuropsychological Profile in High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Antonio Narzisi;Filippo Muratori;Sara Calderoni;Franco Fabbro

  • Motor facilitation of the human cortico-spinal system during observation of bio-mechanically impossible movements.

    Michela Romani;Paola Cesari;Cosimo Urgesi;Stefano Facchini

  • Fooling the Kickers but not the Goalkeepers: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Fake Action Detection in Soccer

    Enzo Tomeo;Paola Cesari;Salvatore M. Aglioti;Cosimo Urgesi

  • Compensatory Plasticity in the Action Observation Network: Virtual Lesions of STS Enhance Anticipatory Simulation of Seen Actions

    Alessio Avenanti;Laura Annella;Matteo Candidi;Cosimo Urgesi

  • Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics.

    Louise P. Kirsch;Cosimo Urgesi;Emily S. Cross;Emily S. Cross

  • Virtual lesion of ventral premotor cortex impairs visual perception of biomechanically possible but not impossible actions

    Matteo Candidi;Cosimo Urgesi;Silvio Ionta;Salvatore M. Aglioti

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Salvatore Maria Aglioti Sapienza University of Rome
Franco Fabbro
Franco Fabbro University of Udine
Alessio Avenanti
Alessio Avenanti University of Bologna
Rosario Montirosso
Rosario Montirosso Eugenio Medea
Filippo Muratori
Filippo Muratori University of Pisa
Paolo Brambilla
Paolo Brambilla University of Milan
Emily S. Cross
Emily S. Cross University of Glasgow
Andrea Marini
Andrea Marini University of Udine
Matteo Balestrieri
Matteo Balestrieri University of Udine
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA can lead to a diverse range of career paths, especially when paired with related degrees in counseling, therapy, and psychology. Many students choose to broaden their expertise with specialized programs that can be pursued online, offering affordability and flexibility.

If you’re interested in school-based support services, consider the university of the cumberlands school counseling program. For those seeking cost-effective pathways to become Licensed Professional Counselors, exploring the cheapest online lpc programs can open doors to clinical roles in mental health.

Another popular route for neuroscience graduates is family therapy. Accredited options, such as online mft programs accredited by specialist bodies, prepare students for careers supporting couples and families. Alternatively, those seeking broader psychological expertise may benefit from a masters of psychology online degree.

Each educational pathway has distinct advantages depending on your career goals, whether in research, therapy, or clinical practice. Exploring these related fields can enhance your qualifications and professional opportunities in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Cosimo Urgesi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles