World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Beatrice de Gelder

Beatrice de Gelder

Award Badge
Neuroscience
Netherlands
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
95
Citations
31123
World Ranking
776
National Ranking
43

Neuroscience

D-Index
95
Citations
31327
World Ranking
909
National Ranking
29

Beatrice de Gelder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beatrice de Gelder sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 371 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Beatrice de Gelder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beatrice de Gelder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Beatrice de Gelder is a researcher affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their scholarly work covers multiple disciplines within neuroscience and psychology, emphasizing cognitive processes and behavioral studies.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these fields, the subfields of focus are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Sensory Systems

Their research topics span diverse areas, involving:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration

Frequently publishing in several scientific journals, they have contributed notably to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of Vision
  • NeuroImage
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • "The rise of affectivism," 2021, published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "A computational neuroethology perspective on body and expression perception," 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Computation-Based Feature Representation of Body Expressions in the Human Brain," 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • "The role of computational and subjective features in emotional body expressions," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Being the victim of virtual abuse changes default mode network responses to emotional expressions," 2020, Cortex

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their academic work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Marta Poyo Solanas
  • Maarten J. Vaessen
  • Martin A. Giese
  • Minye Zhan
  • Giuseppe Marrazzo

Best Publications

  • Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals

    Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language

    Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • The perception of emotions by ear and by eye

    Beatrice de Gelder;Jean Vroomen

  • Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language.

    Hanneke K. M. Meeren;Corné C. R. J. van Heijnsbergen;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Fear fosters flight: A mechanism for fear contagion when perceiving emotion expressed by a whole body

    Beatrice de Gelder;Josh Snyder;Doug Greve;George Gerard

  • Body expressions influence recognition of emotions in the face and voice.

    Jan Van den Stock;Ruthger Righart;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Sound enhances visual perception: cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision.

    J. Vroomen;B. de Gelder

  • Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus

    Bruno Rossion;Laurence Dricot;Anne Devolder;Jean-Michel Bodart

  • Why bodies? Twelve reasons for including bodily expressions in affective neuroscience

    Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity

    Beatrice De Gelder;Beatrice De Gelder;Paul Bertelson;Paul Bertelson

  • Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony.

    Jean J. Vroomen;Mirjam M. Keetels;Béatrice De Gelder;Béatrice De Gelder;Paul Bertelson;Paul Bertelson

  • Crossmodal binding of fear in voice and face

    Raymond J. Dolan;J. S. Morris;B. de Gelder

  • Unseen facial and bodily expressions trigger fast emotional reactions

    Marco Tamietto;Lorys Castelli;Sergio Vighetti;Paola Perozzo

  • Seeing Fearful Body Expressions Activates the Fusiform Cortex and Amygdala

    Nouchine Hadjikhani;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Perceiving fear in dynamic body expressions.

    J. Grèzes;S. Pichon;B. de Gelder

  • Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions

    Beatrice de Gelder;Jan Van den Stock;Jan Van den Stock;Hanneke K.M. Meeren;Charlotte B.A. Sinke;Charlotte B.A. Sinke

  • The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention

    P Bertelson;J Vroomen;B de Gelder;Jon Driver

  • The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: an ERP study on the body-inversion effect.

    Jeroen J. Stekelenburg;Beatrice de Gelder

  • The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt

    Richard Held;Yuri Ostrovsky;Beatrice de Gelder;Tapan Gandhi

  • Face recognition and lip-reading in autism

    Beatrice de Gelder;Jean Vroomen;Lucienne van der Heide

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Tamietto
Marco Tamietto University of Turin
Jean Vroomen
Jean Vroomen Tilburg University
Paul Bertelson
Paul Bertelson Université Libre de Bruxelles
Alan J. Pegna
Alan J. Pegna University of Queensland
Nouchine Hadjikhani
Nouchine Hadjikhani Harvard Medical School
Julie Grèzes
Julie Grèzes École Normale Supérieure
Jack van Honk
Jack van Honk Utrecht University
Mariska E. Kret
Mariska E. Kret Leiden University
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens flexible, affordable paths for students at every stage. Many universities now offer accredited, fully online psychology programs that allow for part-time or full-time study, letting you balance work or family responsibilities. When researching your options, cost is a key factor; some cities provide more budget-friendly education than others.

If you are looking for the cheapest psychology degrees in Los Angeles, several universities in the area offer accessible and quality programs. For those in the Midwest, consider universities that offer cheapest psychology programs in Minneapolis or affordable psychology programs in Missouri to keep costs manageable.

Online degrees in psychology can lead to diverse career pathways, such as counseling, social work, human resources, or research. Students in Kentucky may be interested in affordable psychology degrees in Louisville for a value-driven education. No matter your location, comparing programs by cost, accreditation, and flexibility helps you choose the best online degree to match your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Beatrice de Gelder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles