World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8206 7662 4400 4006 194 7295

Mary A. Peterson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary A. Peterson between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary A. Peterson published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2010. 9 of the 224 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2010. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 7 publications
1983 2025

224 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary A. Peterson: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 6
1992 1
1993 2
1994 5
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 4
1999 4
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 4
2004 5
2005 7
2006 6
2007 2
2008 4
2009 4
2010 29
2011 7
2012 14
2013 18
2014 13
2015 10
2016 9
2017 9
2018 8
2019 7
2020 4
2021 6
2022 6
2023 6
2024 2
2025 7
Total 224
Download as CSV

Mary A. Peterson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Peterson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 194 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 194
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary A. Peterson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Peterson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary A. Peterson is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research is primarily situated in the field of neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience. Additional areas of study include computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and sensory systems.

The scientist's body of work extensively covers topics including face recognition and perception, visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural and behavioral psychology studies, visual attention and saliency detection, neural dynamics and brain function, multisensory perception and integration, and aesthetic perception and analysis.

Mary A. Peterson has contributed to several recent publications. These include:

  • Prior Experience Alters the Appearance of Blurry Object Borders, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Normative data for an expanded set of stimuli for testing high-level influences on object perception: OMEFA-II, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Effects of Conceptual Titles on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Artistic Photographs, 2022, Empirical Studies of the Arts
  • Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms, 2022, Vision
  • Holistic processing is modulated by the probability that parts contain task-congruent information, 2023, Attention Perception & Psychophysics

The frequent venues where their work appears include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • Empirical Studies of the Arts

Frequent collaborators in Mary A. Peterson's research include Colin S. Flowers, Jingming Xue, Diana C. Perez, Rachel M. Skocypec, and Robert C. Wilson. These collaborations suggest active engagement with colleagues across various subfields related to visual and cognitive neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • A Century of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception I. Perceptual Grouping and Figure-Ground Organization

    Johan Wagemans;James H. Elder;Michael Kubovy;Stephen E. Palmer

  • Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions

    Daniel L. Schacter;Lynn A. Cooper;Suzanne M. Delaney;Mary A. Peterson

  • Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril

    Mary A. Peterson;Bradley S. Gibson

  • Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours

    Mary A. Peterson;Bradley S. Gibson

  • Shape Recognition Inputs to Figure-Ground Organization in Three-Dimensional Displays.

    Mary A. Peterson;Bradley S. Gibson

  • Object Recognition Processes Can and Do Operate Before Figure–Ground Organization

    Mary A. Peterson

  • Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception.

    Mary A. Peterson;Julian Hochberg

  • Perception of faces, objects, and scenes : analytic and holistic processes

    Mary A. Peterson;Gillian Rhodes

  • Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: perceptually coupled responses to moving objects.

    Julian Hochberg;Mary A. Peterson

  • Mental images can be ambiguous: reconstruals and reference-frame reversals.

    Mary A. Peterson;John F. Kihlstrom;Patricia M. Rose;Martha L. Glisky

  • Language and space

    Paul Bloom;Mary A. Peterson;Lynn Nadel;Merrill F. Garrett

  • Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: which route counts?

    Mary A. Peterson;Erin M. Harvey;Hollis J. Weidenbacher

  • Reduction in white matter connectivity, revealed by diffusion tensor imaging, may account for age-related changes in face perception

    Cibu Thomas;Linda Moya;Galia Avidan;Kate Humphreys

  • Figure-ground segmentation can occur without attention

    Ruth Kimchi;Mary A. Peterson

  • Directing spatial attention within an object: altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions.

    Mary A. Peterson;Bradley S. Gibson

  • EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.

    Logan T. Trujillo;Mary A. Peterson;Alfred W. Kaszniak;John J.B. Allen

  • The hippocampus: part of an interactive posterior representational system spanning perceptual and memorial systems

    Lynn Nadel;Mary A. Peterson

  • The initial identification of figure-ground relationships: Contributions from shape recognition processes

    Mary A. Peterson;Bradley S. Gibson

  • Does orientation-independent object recognition precede orientation-dependent recognition? Evidence from a cuing paradigm.

    Bradley S. Gibson;Mary A. Peterson

  • Object memory effects on figure assignment: conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient.

    Mary A. Peterson;Beatrice De Gelder;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Peter C. Gerhardstein

  • Inhibitory competition in figure-ground perception: context and convexity.

    Mary A. Peterson;Elizabeth Salvagio

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick J. Bennett
Patrick J. Bennett McMaster University
Allison B. Sekuler
Allison B. Sekuler McMaster University
John J.B. Allen
John J.B. Allen University of Arizona
Ruth Kimchi
Ruth Kimchi University of Haifa
Morgan D. Barense
Morgan D. Barense University of Toronto
Lynn Nadel
Lynn Nadel University of Arizona
Jay Pratt
Jay Pratt University of Toronto
David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
Stephen E. Palmer
Stephen E. Palmer University of California, Berkeley
Rebecca L. Gómez
Rebecca L. Gómez University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology degrees open doors to a variety of online programs and rewarding career pathways in mental health. Choosing the right degree can set you on the path to roles such as counseling, therapy, and research. Most aspiring counselors start with a bachelor’s in psychology or a related field before advancing to specialized graduate programs.

Becoming a licensed mental health counselor has unique requirements depending on your location. For example, you can learn more about mental health counselor requirements in Austin or explore the process for how to become a mental health counselor in Bakersfield. Each state, and sometimes each city, may have different steps for education, supervised experience, and licensing exams.

If you’re interested in regional differences, you can review the Baltimore mental health counselor education requirements or discover how to become a mental health counselor in Boise. No matter where you plan to practice, researching local regulations and pursuing accredited online degrees are essential steps toward building a successful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mary A. Peterson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles