World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
87
Citations
49741
World Ranking
1060
National Ranking
654

Neuroscience

D-Index
88
Citations
50635
World Ranking
1175
National Ranking
602

Lynn Nadel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Nadel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lynn Nadel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Nadel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2019 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2006 - Grawemeyer Award in Psychology, University of Louisville
  • 1991 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lynn Nadel is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on Neuroscience, with a significant number of publications in related subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

Their main topics of work include:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Lynn Nadel has coauthored papers with:

  • Katharine Simon
  • Richard D. Lane
  • Andrew P. Maurer
  • Yu-Chin Chen
  • Viet Ton That

Their work has been published primarily in several key scientific venues, including:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Hippocampus
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Among their recent papers are:

  • "The Continuity of Context: A Role for the Hippocampus," 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "The functions of sleep: A cognitive neuroscience perspective," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Diffusion MRI-guided theta burst stimulation enhances memory and functional connectivity along the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in mild cognitive impairment," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "To update or to create? The influence of novelty and prior knowledge on memory networks," 2024, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "The hippocampal formation and action at a distance," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Lynn Nadel has received several awards throughout their career, including:

  • APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association, 2020
  • William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science, 2019
  • Grawemeyer Award in Psychology from the University of Louisville, 2006
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1991

Best Publications

  • The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map

    John O'Keefe;Lynn Nadel

  • Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex

    Lynn Nadel;Morris Moscovitch

  • Long-axis specialization of the human hippocampus

    Jordan Poppenk;Hallvard R. Evensmoen;Morris Moscovitch;Lynn Nadel

  • Episodic Memory and Beyond: The Hippocampus and Neocortex in Transformation

    Morris Moscovitch;Roberto Cabeza;Gordon Winocur;Lynn Nadel

  • Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory

    Morris Moscovitch;R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Asaf Gilboa;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis

  • The cognitive neuroscience of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory.

    Morris Moscovitch;Lynn Nadel;Gordon Winocur;Asaf Gilboa

  • Cognitive neuroscience of emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Lynn Nadel

  • Viewpoints: how the hippocampus contributes to memory, navigation and cognition

    John Lisman;György Buzsáki;Howard Eichenbaum;Lynn Nadel

  • Multiple trace theory of human memory: computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results.

    L. Nadel;A. Samsonovich;L. Ryan;M. Moscovitch

  • Review of the toxicology of chlorpyrifos with an emphasis on human exposure and neurodevelopment.

    David L. Eaton;Robert B. Daroff;Herman Autrup;James Bridges

  • Reconsolidation of Episodic Memories: A Subtle Reminder Triggers Integration of New Information.

    Almut Hupbach;Rebecca Gomez;Oliver Hardt;Lynn Nadel

  • Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex.

    Veronique D Bohbot;Miroslav Kalina;Katerina Stepankova;Natasa Spackova

  • The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: evidence for hippocampal dysfunction.

    Bruce F. Pennington;Jennifer Moon;Jamie Edgin;Jennifer Stedron

  • Précis of O'Keefe & Nadel's The hippocampus as a cognitive map

    John O'Keefe;Lynn Nadel

  • The hippocampus and space revisited.

    Lynn Nadel

  • Spatial memory deficit in senescent rats.

    C. A. Barnes;L. Nadel;Werner K. Honig

  • Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science.

    Richard D. Lane;Lee Ryan;Lynn Nadel;Leslie Greenberg

  • Stress-induced recovery of fears and phobias.

    W. J. Jacobs;Lynn Nadel

  • Context and conditioning: A place for space

    Lynn Nadel;Jeffrey Willner

  • Decay happens: the role of active forgetting in memory

    Oliver Hardt;Karim Nader;Lynn Nadel

  • Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat.

    John O'Keefe;Lynn Nadel;Simon Keightley;David Kill

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee Ryan
Lee Ryan University of Arizona
Rebecca L. Gómez
Rebecca L. Gómez University of Arizona
W. Jake Jacobs
W. Jake Jacobs University of Arizona
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Jamie O. Edgin
Jamie O. Edgin Virginia Tech
Jessica D. Payne
Jessica D. Payne University of Notre Dame
Véronique D. Bohbot
Véronique D. Bohbot Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Gordon Winocur
Gordon Winocur University of Toronto
Kevin G. F. Thomas
Kevin G. F. Thomas University of Pretoria
Richard D. Lane
Richard D. Lane University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths, from counseling and human resources to research and mental health services. As online education grows, many students are exploring remote learning for greater flexibility. When choosing a program, it’s important to consider not just curriculum, but also long-term value and career outcomes.

Recent rankings shed light on which psychology degrees can deliver the greatest returns for your investment. For instance, the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New Jersey and the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New York highlight programs known for high alumni earnings and strong job prospects.

Similar trends are seen in other regions, as shown in the most valuable psychology degrees in Phoenix and most valuable psychology degrees in Raleigh reports. Reviewing these rankings can help prospective students make informed choices about online psychology programs and how they align with future career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn Nadel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles