World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 87 1060 931 654 561 227 49741
Neuroscience 88 1175 1058 602 528 237 50635

Lynn Nadel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lynn Nadel between 1966 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lynn Nadel published across 60 years, from 1966 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2007. 10 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2007. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 3 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 7 publications
1966 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lynn Nadel: publications per year, 1966 to 2025
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 1
1968 3
1969 2
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 2
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 4
1980 4
1981 2
1982 2
1983 0
1984 2
1985 3
1986 2
1987 4
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 6
1992 3
1993 3
1994 5
1995 9
1996 5
1997 5
1998 10
1999 5
2000 12
2001 5
2002 8
2003 5
2004 4
2005 7
2006 5
2007 14
2008 9
2009 8
2010 8
2011 6
2012 6
2013 14
2014 4
2015 4
2016 7
2017 8
2018 4
2019 2
2020 10
2021 4
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
2025 7
Total 261
Download as CSV

Lynn Nadel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Nadel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 227
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lynn Nadel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Nadel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 87
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2019 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2006 - Grawemeyer Award in Psychology, University of Louisville
  • 1991 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lynn Nadel is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on Neuroscience, with a significant number of publications in related subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

Their main topics of work include:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Lynn Nadel has coauthored papers with:

  • Katharine Simon
  • Richard D. Lane
  • Andrew P. Maurer
  • Yu-Chin Chen
  • Viet Ton That

Their work has been published primarily in several key scientific venues, including:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Hippocampus
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Among their recent papers are:

  • "The Continuity of Context: A Role for the Hippocampus," 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "The functions of sleep: A cognitive neuroscience perspective," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Diffusion MRI-guided theta burst stimulation enhances memory and functional connectivity along the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in mild cognitive impairment," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "To update or to create? The influence of novelty and prior knowledge on memory networks," 2024, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "The hippocampal formation and action at a distance," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Lynn Nadel has received several awards throughout their career, including:

  • APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association, 2020
  • William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science, 2019
  • Grawemeyer Award in Psychology from the University of Louisville, 2006
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1991

Best Publications

  • The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map

    John O'Keefe;Lynn Nadel

  • Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex

    Lynn Nadel;Morris Moscovitch

  • Long-axis specialization of the human hippocampus

    Jordan Poppenk;Hallvard R. Evensmoen;Morris Moscovitch;Lynn Nadel

  • Episodic Memory and Beyond: The Hippocampus and Neocortex in Transformation

    Morris Moscovitch;Roberto Cabeza;Gordon Winocur;Lynn Nadel

  • Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory

    Morris Moscovitch;R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Asaf Gilboa;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis

  • The cognitive neuroscience of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory.

    Morris Moscovitch;Lynn Nadel;Gordon Winocur;Asaf Gilboa

  • Cognitive neuroscience of emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Lynn Nadel

  • Viewpoints: how the hippocampus contributes to memory, navigation and cognition

    John Lisman;György Buzsáki;Howard Eichenbaum;Lynn Nadel

  • Multiple trace theory of human memory: computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results.

    L. Nadel;A. Samsonovich;L. Ryan;M. Moscovitch

  • Review of the toxicology of chlorpyrifos with an emphasis on human exposure and neurodevelopment.

    David L. Eaton;Robert B. Daroff;Herman Autrup;James Bridges

  • Reconsolidation of Episodic Memories: A Subtle Reminder Triggers Integration of New Information.

    Almut Hupbach;Rebecca Gomez;Oliver Hardt;Lynn Nadel

  • Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex.

    Veronique D Bohbot;Miroslav Kalina;Katerina Stepankova;Natasa Spackova

  • The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: evidence for hippocampal dysfunction.

    Bruce F. Pennington;Jennifer Moon;Jamie Edgin;Jennifer Stedron

  • Précis of O'Keefe & Nadel's The hippocampus as a cognitive map

    John O'Keefe;Lynn Nadel

  • The hippocampus and space revisited.

    Lynn Nadel

  • Spatial memory deficit in senescent rats.

    C. A. Barnes;L. Nadel;Werner K. Honig

  • Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science.

    Richard D. Lane;Lee Ryan;Lynn Nadel;Leslie Greenberg

  • Stress-induced recovery of fears and phobias.

    W. J. Jacobs;Lynn Nadel

  • Context and conditioning: A place for space

    Lynn Nadel;Jeffrey Willner

  • Decay happens: the role of active forgetting in memory

    Oliver Hardt;Karim Nader;Lynn Nadel

  • Fornix lesions selectively abolish place learning in the rat.

    John O'Keefe;Lynn Nadel;Simon Keightley;David Kill

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee Ryan
Lee Ryan University of Arizona
Rebecca L. Gómez
Rebecca L. Gómez University of Arizona
W. Jake Jacobs
W. Jake Jacobs University of Arizona
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Jamie O. Edgin
Jamie O. Edgin Virginia Tech
Jessica D. Payne
Jessica D. Payne University of Notre Dame
Véronique D. Bohbot
Véronique D. Bohbot Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Gordon Winocur
Gordon Winocur University of Toronto
Kevin G. F. Thomas
Kevin G. F. Thomas University of Pretoria
Richard D. Lane
Richard D. Lane University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of career paths, from counseling and human resources to research and mental health services. As online education grows, many students are exploring remote learning for greater flexibility. When choosing a program, it’s important to consider not just curriculum, but also long-term value and career outcomes.

Recent rankings shed light on which psychology degrees can deliver the greatest returns for your investment. For instance, the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New Jersey and the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in New York highlight programs known for high alumni earnings and strong job prospects.

Similar trends are seen in other regions, as shown in the most valuable psychology degrees in Phoenix and most valuable psychology degrees in Raleigh reports. Reviewing these rankings can help prospective students make informed choices about online psychology programs and how they align with future career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn Nadel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles