World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
39392
World Ranking
2009
National Ranking
1169

Neuroscience

D-Index
72
Citations
39371
World Ranking
2254
National Ranking
1071

Richard D. Lane publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Lane sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard D. Lane D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard D. Lane sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard D. Lane is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a significant focus on subfields such as clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics that reflect interdisciplinary interests, including:

  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory

Richard D. Lane has published numerous articles in a range of academic venues. The most frequent publication venues for their work include Neuropsychoanalysis, Psychosomatic Medicine, BioPsychoSocial Medicine, Frontiers in Psychiatry, and Trends in Neurosciences.

Among recent papers, notable works include:

  • "Levels of Emotional Awareness: Theory and Measurement of a Socio-Emotional Skill," published in 2021 in the Journal of Intelligence
  • "The role of enhanced emotional awareness in promoting change across psychotherapy modalities," published in 2020 in the Journal of Psychotherapy Integration

Other significant papers by coauthors linked to the field include:

  • "Diseases, Disorders, and Comorbidities of Interoception," 2020, Trends in Neurosciences
  • "The evolution and development of the uniquely human capacity for emotional awareness: A synthesis of comparative anatomical, cognitive, neurocomputational, and evolutionary psychological perspectives," 2020, Biological Psychology
  • "Improvements in mindfulness, interoceptive and emotional awareness, emotion regulation, and interpersonal emotion management following completion of an online emotional skills training program," 2023, Emotion

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Richard D. Lane encompass:

  • Ryan Smith
  • Karen L. Weihs
  • Leslie S. Greenberg
  • John J. B. Allen
  • Uëli Kramer

Best Publications

  • A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation.

    Julian F Thayer;Richard D Lane

  • Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception

    Mary L Phillips;Wayne C Drevets;Scott L Rauch;Richard Lane

  • Claude Bernard and the heart-brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration.

    Julian F. Thayer;Richard D. Lane

  • Neurobiology of emotion perception II: Implications for major psychiatric disorders

    Mary L Phillips;Wayne C Drevets;Scott L Rauch;Richard Lane

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • Levels of emotional awareness: a cognitive-developmental theory and its application to psychopathology.

    Richard D. Lane;Gary E. Schwartz

  • The role of vagal function in the risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality.

    Julian F. Thayer;Richard D. Lane

  • The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale: A cognitive-developmental measure of emotion.

    Richard D. Lane;Donald M. Quinlan;Gary E. Schwartz;Pamela A. Walker

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of pleasant and unpleasant emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Eric M. Reiman;Margaret M. Bradley;Peter J. Lang

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust.

    Richard D. Lane;Eric M. Reiman;Geoffrey L. Ahern;Gary E. Schwartz

  • Neural Correlates of Levels of Emotional Awareness: Evidence of an Interaction between Emotion and Attention in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

    Richard D. Lane;Eric M. Reiman;Beatrice Axelrod;Lang-Sheng Yun

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of externally and internally generated human emotion

    Eric M. Reiman;Richard D. Lane;Geoffrey L. Ahern;Gary E. Schwartz

  • Neural correlates of heart rate variability during emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Kateri McRae;Kateri McRae;Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen

  • Cognitive neuroscience of emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Lynn Nadel

  • IMPAIRED VERBAL AND NONVERBAL EMOTION RECOGNITION IN ALEXITHYMIA

    Richard D. Lane;Lee Sechrest;Robert Reidel;Victoria Weldon

  • Neural activation during selective attention to subjective emotional responses

    Richard D. Lane;Gereon R. Fink;Phyllis M.-L. Chau;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures

    Richard D. Lane;Richard D. Lane;Phyllis M.L. Chua;Phyllis M.L. Chua;Raymond J. Dolan;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Sex Differences in Emotional Awareness

    Lisa Feldman Barrett;Richard D. Lane;Lee Sechrest;Gary E. Schwartz

  • Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science.

    Richard D. Lane;Lee Ryan;Lynn Nadel;Leslie Greenberg

  • Is alexithymia the emotional equivalent of blindsight

    Richard D Lane;Geoffrey L Ahern;Gary E Schwartz;Alfred W Kaszniak

  • Impaired self-awareness and theory of mind: an fMRI study of mentalizing in alexithymia.

    Yoshiya Moriguchi;Takashi Ohnishi;Richard D. Lane;Motonari Maeda

Frequent Co-Authors

Julian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer University of California, Irvine
Gary E. Schwartz
Gary E. Schwartz University of Arizona
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University
William D.S. Killgore
William D.S. Killgore University of Arizona
Kateri McRae
Kateri McRae University of Denver
John J.B. Allen
John J.B. Allen University of Arizona
Lynn Nadel
Lynn Nadel University of Arizona
Alfred W. Kaszniak
Alfred W. Kaszniak University of Arizona
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Karen L. Weihs
Karen L. Weihs University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up numerous academic and professional opportunities. Flexible online programs allow students to access top-ranked schools regardless of location, bringing high-quality education to a wider audience.

When considering programs, locations can matter for networking and internship opportunities. For example, students might look to best-ranked psychology degree programs in Reno or the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Seattle for regionally-focused experiences, while others prefer schools like the best-ranked psychology degree programs in University, MS for their unique strengths.

Psychology graduates find diverse career pathways—from counseling and mental health services, to research, HR, and more. In fact, graduates from the top-ranked psychology degree programs in USA often pursue roles in healthcare, education, and emerging fields like UX research. The flexibility of online study, combined with a robust job market, makes pursuing a psychology degree an exciting choice for today’s learners.

Best Scientists Citing Richard D. Lane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles