World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10328 9667 5418 4946 82 13129

Kateri McRae publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kateri McRae between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kateri McRae published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2022. 7 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2022. 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
2004 2025

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kateri McRae: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 4
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 2
2012 6
2013 5
2014 6
2015 2
2016 4
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 6
2021 3
2022 10
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
Total 88
Download as CSV

Kateri McRae publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kateri McRae sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 82
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kateri McRae D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kateri McRae sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kateri McRae is affiliated with the University of Denver in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology. Their primary area of research covers multiple domains within psychology, focusing particularly on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, clinical psychology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's publications frequently appear in prominent venues such as Emotion, Affective Science, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Motivation and Emotion, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). These journals correspond with their broad interest in emotion regulation, mental health, and cognitive processes.

McRae's research topics include a range of mental health and behavioral themes:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cultural Differences and Values

Frequent collaboration shapes much of McRae's work, with repeated co-authorship involving:

  • James J. Gross
  • John Powers
  • Christian E. Waugh
  • June Gruber
  • Peter J. Gianaros

Notable recent papers authored by McRae include:

  • Emotion regulation., 2020, Emotion
  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The neural bases of cognitive emotion regulation: The roles of strategy and intensity, 2020, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Affective brain patterns as multivariate neural correlates of cardiovascular disease risk, 2020, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • Prosocial correlates of transformative experiences at secular multi-day mass gatherings, 2022, Nature Communications

McRae's work prominently addresses mechanisms of emotion regulation and cognitive control, as well as the neural and psychological underpinnings of emotional and behavioral health. The integration of cardiovascular medicine themes reflects interdisciplinary research bridging psychological processes and physical health outcomes.

Best Publications

  • The Neural Bases of Emotion Regulation: Reappraisal and Suppression of Negative Emotion

    Philippe R Goldin;Kateri McRae;Wiveka Ramel;James J Gross

  • Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal:

    Kateri McRae;Kevin N. Ochsner;Iris B. Mauss;John J. D. Gabrieli

  • Neural correlates of heart rate variability during emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Kateri McRae;Kateri McRae;Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen

  • The development of emotion regulation: an fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal in children, adolescents and young adults

    Kateri McRae;James J. Gross;Jochen Weber;Elaine R. Robertson

  • The neural bases of distraction and reappraisal

    Kateri McRae;Brent Hughes;Sita Chopra;John D. E. Gabrieli

  • Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence.

    Jennifer A. Silvers;Kateri McRae;John D. E. Gabrieli;James J. Gross

  • Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processes in Emotion Generation Common and Distinct Neural Mechanisms

    Kevin N. Ochsner;Rebecca R. Ray;Brent Hughes;Kateri McRae

  • Individual differences in reappraisal ability: Links to reappraisal frequency, well-being, and cognitive control

    Kateri McRae;Scott E. Jacobs;Rebecca D. Ray;Oliver P. John

  • Unpacking Cognitive Reappraisal: Goals, Tactics, and Outcomes

    Kateri McRae;Bethany Ciesielski;James J. Gross

  • Cognitive reappraisal of negative affect: converging evidence from EMG and self-report.

    Rebecca D. Ray;Kateri McRae;Kevin N. Ochsner;James J. Gross

  • Individual differences in typical reappraisal use predict amygdala and prefrontal responses.

    Emily M. Drabant;Kateri McRae;Stephen B. Manuck;Ahmad R. Hariri

  • Bottom-up and top-down emotion generation: Implications for emotion regulation

    Kateri McRae;Supriya Misra;Aditya K. Prasad;Sean C. Pereira

  • The up- and down-regulation of amusement: experiential, behavioral, and autonomic consequences.

    Nicole R. Giuliani;Kateri McRae;James J. Gross

  • Emotion Regulation and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Prospective Investigation

    Matthew Tyler Boden;Stefan Westermann;Kateri McRae;Janice Kuo

  • Cognitive emotion regulation: a review of theory and scientific findings

    Kateri McRae

  • Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status.

    Allison S. Troy;Brett Q. Ford;Kateri McRae;Pareezad Zarolia

  • Association between trait emotional awareness and dorsal anterior cingulate activity during emotion is arousal-dependent

    Kateri McRae;Kateri McRae;Eric M. Reiman;Eric M. Reiman;Eric M. Reiman;Carolyn L. Fort;Kewei Chen

  • Emotion regulation choice: the role of environmental affordances.

    Gaurav Suri;Gal Sheppes;Gerald Young;Damon Abraham

  • Common representation of pain and negative emotion in the midbrain periaqueductal gray

    Jason T. Buhle;Hedy Kober;Kevin N. Ochsner;Peter Mende-Siedlecki

  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science

    June Gruber;Jane Mendle;Kristen A. Lindquist;Toni Schmader

  • The development of emotion regulation: an fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal in children, adolescents and young adults

    John D. E. Gabrieli;Kateri McRae;James J. Gross;Jochen Weber

  • BRIEF REPORTS Cognitive Reappraisal of Negative Affect: Converging Evidence From EMG and Self-Report

    Rebecca D. Ray;Kateri McRae;Kevin N. Ochsner;James J. Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University
Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Richard D. Lane
Richard D. Lane University of Arizona
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University
Jochen Weber
Jochen Weber Columbia University
Julian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer University of California, Irvine
Iris B. Mauss
Iris B. Mauss University of California, Berkeley
Brett Q. Ford
Brett Q. Ford University of Toronto
Leanne M. Williams
Leanne M. Williams Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding careers, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many students are now considering online degrees for their flexibility and affordability, making higher education more accessible than ever.

If you are interested in career pathways such as licensed professional counselor, school counselor, or addiction counselor, exploring the cheapest online counseling master's programs in USA can help you find programs that fit your budget. For those located in specific regions, there are excellent options for affordable online counseling master's degrees in the West.

Local options are also plentiful. Michigan residents can explore affordable online counseling programs in Michigan, while those in New York can look into affordable online counseling programs in New York.

Choosing an accredited and cost-effective online program can lay a strong foundation for a lasting career in counseling, therapy, or social work, helping you make a positive impact while managing educational expenses.

Best Scientists Citing Kateri McRae

Trending Scientists