World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 145 172 156 110 98 653 84373
Medicine 145 1379 1274 804 731 655 84378

Eric M. Reiman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric M. Reiman between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric M. Reiman published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 20.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2023. 91 of the 863 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2023. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 42 publications 2011: 45 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 42 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 46 publications 2020: 47 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 55 publications 2023: 61 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 39 publications
1984 2025

863 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric M. Reiman: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 2
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 7
1997 6
1998 4
1999 5
2000 7
2001 6
2002 9
2003 4
2004 18
2005 11
2006 25
2007 25
2008 31
2009 33
2010 42
2011 45
2012 39
2013 42
2014 29
2015 33
2016 37
2017 29
2018 28
2019 46
2020 47
2021 33
2022 55
2023 61
2024 52
2025 39
Total 863
Download as CSV

Eric M. Reiman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric M. Reiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 648–657 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 653 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11 653
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric M. Reiman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric M. Reiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144–145 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 145 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13 145
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award
  • 2013 - Sedgwick Memorial Medal, American Public Health Association
  • 2013 - Potamkin Prize for Research in Pick's, Alzheimer's, and Related Diseases, American Academy of Neurology

Overview

Eric M. Reiman is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on medical and neurological disciplines, with a strong emphasis on dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Reiman's main field of study is Medicine, with 522 publications. Within this, significant subfields of study include Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, and Molecular Biology. Their work is closely associated with topics such as:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Frequent publication venues for Reiman include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Neurology

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders," 2020, JAMA
  • "Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer's dementia," 2020, Nature Medicine
  • "APOE4 leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline," 2020, Nature
  • "Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation," 2020, Nature Medicine
  • "Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Nature Communications

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Reiman include Kewei Chen, John C. Morris, Yi Su, Paul M. Thompson, and Yinghua Chen.

Throughout their career, Eric M. Reiman has received recognition in the form of awards such as the Potamkin Prize for Research in Pick's, Alzheimer's, and Related Diseases awarded by the American Academy of Neurology in 2013, as well as the Sedgwick Memorial Medal from the American Public Health Association the same year.

Best Publications

  • Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease

    Reisa A. Sperling;Paul S. Aisen;Laurel A. Beckett;David A. Bennett

  • Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Adam C. Naj;Gyungah Jun;Gary W. Beecham;Li-San Wang

  • Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer's disease in persons homozygous for the epsilon 4 allele for apolipoprotein E.

    Eric M. Reiman;Richard J. Caselli;Lang S. Yun;Kewei Chen

  • Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Shorena Janelidze;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Use of Florbetapir-PET for Imaging β-Amyloid Pathology

    Christopher M. Clark;Julie A. Schneider;Barry J. Bedell;Thomas G. Beach

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of pleasant and unpleasant emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Eric M. Reiman;Margaret M. Bradley;Peter J. Lang

  • Thermosensory activation of insular cortex.

    A. D. Craig;K. Chen;D. Bandy;E. M. Reiman

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • APOE4 leads to blood–brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline

    Axel Montagne;Daniel A. Nation;Abhay P. Sagare;Giuseppe Barisano

  • Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's dementia

    Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen;Gene E. Alexander;Gene E. Alexander;Richard J. Caselli;Richard J. Caselli

  • Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer’s dementia

    Shorena Janelidze;Niklas Mattsson;Sebastian Palmqvist;Ruben Smith

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust.

    Richard D. Lane;Eric M. Reiman;Geoffrey L. Ahern;Gary E. Schwartz

  • Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

    Rebecca Sims;Sven J. Van Der Lee;Adam C. Naj;Céline Bellenguez;Céline Bellenguez

  • Neural Correlates of Levels of Emotional Awareness: Evidence of an Interaction between Emotion and Attention in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

    Richard D. Lane;Eric M. Reiman;Beatrice Axelrod;Lang-Sheng Yun

  • Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation

    Erik C.B. Johnson;Eric B. Dammer;Duc M. Duong;Lingyan Ping

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of externally and internally generated human emotion

    Eric M. Reiman;Richard D. Lane;Geoffrey L. Ahern;Gary E. Schwartz

  • Fibrillar amyloid-β burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen;Xiaofen Liu;Daniel Bandy

  • Neural correlates of heart rate variability during emotion

    Richard D. Lane;Kateri McRae;Kateri McRae;Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen

  • Cerebral PET with florbetapir compared with neuropathology at autopsy for detection of neuritic amyloid-β plaques: a prospective cohort study

    Christopher M Clark;Michael J Pontecorvo;Thomas G Beach;Barry J Bedell

  • The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database: the Uniform Data Set.

    Duane L. Beekly;Erin M. Ramos;William W. Lee;Woodrow D. Deitrich

  • Multicenter Standardized 18F-FDG PET Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Other Dementias

    Lisa Mosconi;Wai H. Tsui;Wai H. Tsui;Karl Herholz;Alberto Pupi

  • Functional imaging of an illusion of pain.

    A. D. Craig;E. M. Reiman;A. Evans;M. C. Bushnell

Frequent Co-Authors

Kewei Chen
Kewei Chen Arizona State University
Gene E. Alexander
Gene E. Alexander University of Arizona
Pierre N. Tariot
Pierre N. Tariot University of Rochester
Adam S. Fleisher
Adam S. Fleisher Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital
Francisco Lopera
Francisco Lopera University of Antioquia
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Keith A. Johnson
Keith A. Johnson Harvard University
Michael W. Weiner
Michael W. Weiner University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As neuroscience continues to grow as an interdisciplinary field, students often explore additional or alternative pathways to enhance their expertise and career opportunities. Many find value in pairing their neuroscience studies with knowledge from psychology, therapy, or social work.

For those interested in therapeutic and counseling careers, consider exploring mft masters programs, which can complement a neuroscience background by providing insight into family dynamics and clinical techniques. Another popular option is pursuing a master’s in psychology. Curious about the costs? Discover how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology for affordable online choices.

Undergraduates may want to know how much is a psychology degree as they weigh their options. Additionally, for those considering work as licensed social workers, there are increasingly accessible options among the msw online programs.

Combining neuroscience with these related online degrees can open doors to diverse fields—ranging from clinical practice and counseling to research, advocacy, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Eric M. Reiman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles