World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
12907
World Ranking
5678
National Ranking
203

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
11894
World Ranking
5692
National Ranking
300

Arko Lucieer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arko Lucieer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 204 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Arko Lucieer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arko Lucieer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arko Lucieer is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on Ecology, Environmental Engineering, and Global and Planetary Change.

The main research topics covered by Lucieer's work include:

  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Fire Effects on Ecosystems
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation

Lucieer has published papers in several scientific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Drones
  • Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • Sensors
  • Precision Agriculture

Recent publications include:

  • "A Calibration Procedure for Field and UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Instruments," 2020, Sensors
  • "Individual tree detection and crown delineation from Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) LiDAR in structurally complex mixed species eucalypt forests," 2020, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • "From Drones to Phenotype: Using UAV-LiDAR to Detect Species and Provenance Variation in Tree Productivity and Structure," 2020, Remote Sensing
  • "Detecting shrub encroachment in seminatural grasslands using UAS LiDAR," 2020, Ecology and Evolution
  • "High-Resolution Estimates of Fire Severity-An Evaluation of UAS Image and LiDAR Mapping Approaches on a Sedgeland Forest Boundary in Tasmania, Australia," 2021, Fire

Throughout their career, Lucieer has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Darren Turner
  • Emiliano Cimoli
  • Bechu K. V. Yadav
  • Susan C. Baker
  • Gregory J. Jordan

Lucieer's research spans interdisciplinary aspects of environmental monitoring and ecological modeling, often utilizing advanced technologies such as UAVs and LiDAR to analyze forest structures, species variation, and ecosystem changes.

Best Publications

  • An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds

    Darren Turner;Arko Lucieer;Christopher S. Watson

  • Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography:

    Arko Lucieer;Steven M. de Jong;Darren Turner

  • Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory

    Luke Wallace;Arko Lucieer;Christopher S. Watson;Darren Turner

  • Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery

    Steve Harwin;Arko Lucieer

  • Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds

    Luke Wallace;Arko Lucieer;Zbyněk Malenovský;Darren Turner

  • Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A Review of Sensor Technology, Measurement Procedures, and Data Correction Workflows

    Helge Aasen;Eija Honkavaara;Arko Lucieer;Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada

  • Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage Island

    D M Bergstrom;Arko Lucieer;Kate Kiefer;Jane Wasley

  • The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology.

    Matthew F. McCabe;Matthew Rodell;Douglas E. Alsdorf;Diego G. Miralles

  • Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery

    Darren Turner;Arko Lucieer;Luke Wallace

  • Time Series Analysis of Landslide Dynamics Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

    Darren Turner;Arko Lucieer;Steven M. de Jong

  • Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to capture micro-topography of Antarctic moss beds

    Arko Lucieer;Darren Turner;Diana H. King;Sharon A. Robinson

  • Evaluating Tree Detection and Segmentation Routines on Very High Resolution UAV LiDAR Data

    Luke Wallace;Arko Lucieer;Christopher S. Watson

  • Sensor Correction of a 6-Band Multispectral Imaging Sensor for UAV Remote Sensing

    Joshua Kelcey;Arko Lucieer

  • Spatial Co-Registration of Ultra-High Resolution Visible, Multispectral and Thermal Images Acquired with a Micro-UAV over Antarctic Moss Beds

    Darren Turner;Arko Lucieer;Zbyněk Malenovský;Diana H. King

  • Assessing the effects of land use changes on floods in the meuse and oder catchment

    A. De Roo;M. Odijk;G. Schmuck;E. Koster

  • HyperUAS-Imaging Spectroscopy from a Multirotor Unmanned Aircraft System

    Arko Lucieer;Zbyněk Malenovský;Tony Veness;Luke Wallace

  • The Impact of the Calibration Method on the Accuracy of Point Clouds Derived Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Multi-View Stereopsis

    Steve Harwin;Arko Lucieer;Jon Osborn

  • Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches

    Nicolò Camarretta;Peter A. Harrison;Peter A. Harrison;Tanya Bailey;Tanya Bailey;Brad Potts

  • Texture-based classification of sub-Antarctic vegetation communities on Heard Island

    Humphrey Murray;Arko Lucieer;Raymond Williams

  • Snow Depth Retrieval with UAS Using Photogrammetric Techniques

    Benjamin Vander Jagt;Arko Lucieer;Luke Wallace;Darren Turner

  • Multivariate texture-based segmentation of remotely sensed imagery for extraction of objects and their uncertainty

    Arko Lucieer;Alfred Stein;Peter Fisher

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon A. Robinson
Sharon A. Robinson University of Wollongong
Christopher Watson
Christopher Watson University of Tasmania
Alfred Stein
Alfred Stein University of Twente
Zbyněk Malenovský
Zbyněk Malenovský University of Bonn
Mirek Macka
Mirek Macka University of Tasmania
Klaus M Meiners
Klaus M Meiners Australian Antarctic Division
Matthew F. McCabe
Matthew F. McCabe King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Lammert Kooistra
Lammert Kooistra Wageningen University & Research
Brad M. Potts
Brad M. Potts University of Tasmania
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology continues to shape the future, there is a growing demand for engineers and tech professionals to build complementary business and management skills. For those considering interdisciplinary careers, a variety of affordable and flexible online degrees are now available.

Business-minded individuals can look into an online mba no gmat low cost program. These programs offer graduates the business acumen needed for leadership roles in tech companies, without requiring standardized test scores or a hefty financial investment.

Project management is another popular pathway. Many professionals enhance their technical expertise with an accredited project management degree online accredited, which opens doors to managing engineering teams and large-scale technology projects.

For those interested in specialized fields, an online degree in real estate is a valuable asset for engineers entering property development or construction technology sectors. Meanwhile, creative thinkers might consider a ux design degree online to blend technical skills with user experience design, a crucial area for modern product development.

Exploring these online degree options can help engineering and technology students prepare for diverse career opportunities across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Arko Lucieer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles