World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
7781
World Ranking
7258
National Ranking
3928

Peter E. Nathan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter E. Nathan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter E. Nathan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter E. Nathan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter E. Nathan is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on scholarly activities associated with this institution.

There are no recorded recent papers, so specific details regarding research outputs or trends in their publication history are not available.

Information about frequent co-authors is not provided, so no overview of collaborative research networks or partnerships can be detailed.

Similarly, there are no specified frequent publication venues, limiting insight into preferred journals or conferences where their work has appeared.

No book publications are listed, indicating that contributions to monographs or edited volumes are not part of the recorded profile.

Details on main fields of study and subfields of study are absent, so it is unclear what disciplines or specialized areas they primarily investigate.

There are no main topics of work identified, restricting description of particular themes or research questions characteristic of their scientific inquiries.

No awards or honors are noted, leaving the record without formal recognition or distinctions at this time.

Best Publications

  • Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers.

    Antoine Bechara;Sara Dolan;Natalie Denburg;Andrea Hindes

  • A guide to treatments that work, 2nd ed.

    Peter E. Nathan;Jack M. Gorman

  • Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: between Scylla and Charybdis?

    Peter E. Nathan;Scott P. Stuart;Sara L. Dolan

  • The DSM-IV field trial for substance use disorders: major results

    Linda B. Cottler;Marc A. Schuckit;John E. Helzer;Thomas Crowley

  • Effects of frequent marijuana use on memory-related regional cerebral blood flow

    Robert I Block;Daniel S O'Leary;Richard D Hichwa;Jean C Augustinack

  • An experimental analysis of the behavior of alcoholics and nonalcoholics during prolonged experimental drinking: A necessary precursor of behavior therapy?

    Peter E. Nathan;John S. O'Brien

  • Alcoholism: New Directions in Behavioural Research and Treatment

    Unknown

  • The addictive personality is the behavior of the addict.

    Peter E. Nathan

  • Executive dysfunction as a risk marker for substance abuse: the role of impulsive personality traits.

    Sara L. Dolan;Antoine Bechara;Peter E. Nathan

  • Common methodological problems in research on the addictions.

    Peter E. Nathan;David Lansky

  • Behavioral Analysis of Chronic Alcoholism

    Unknown

  • Environmental influences on drinking by college students in a college pub: Behavioral observation in the natural environment☆

    Jonathan Rosenbluth;Peter E. Nathan;David M. Lawson

  • Cerebellar hypoactivity in frequent marijuana users.

    Robert I. Block;Daniel S. O'Leary;Richard D. Hichwa;Jean C. Augustinack

  • Blood alcohol level discrimination. The effects of family history of alcoholism, drinking pattern, and tolerance

    Thomas R. Lipscomb;Peter E. Nathan

  • Practice guidelines: Not yet ideal.

    Peter E. Nathan

  • History of the Concept of Addiction.

    Peter E. Nathan;Mandy Conrad;Anne Helene Skinstad

  • The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Volume 1, Second Edition

    Peter Nathan;Marc Marschark;Patricia Elizabeth Spencer

  • Gender differences in acute psychomotor, cognitive, and pharmacokinetic response to alcohol.

    Raymond S. Niaura;Peter E. Nathan;William Frankenstein;Allan P. Shapiro

  • Blood alcohol level estimation and controlled drinking by chronic alcoholics

    Stanley J. Silverstein;Peter E. Nathan;H.A. Taylor

  • Static ataxia: a predictor of alcoholism?

    Thomas R. Lipscomb;John A. Carpenter;Peter E. Nathan

  • Effects of intoxication on alcoholics' marital communication and problem solving.

    William Frankenstein;William M. Hay;Peter E. Nathan

  • Outcomes of treatment for alcohol problems: current methods, problems, and results.

    Peter E. Nathan;Anne-Helene Skinstad

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack M. Gorman
Jack M. Gorman Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Raymond Niaura
Raymond Niaura New York University
Sudhansu Chokroverty
Sudhansu Chokroverty Seton Hall University
Erich Labouvie
Erich Labouvie Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jon Morgenstern
Jon Morgenstern Columbia University
Antoine Bechara
Antoine Bechara University of Southern California
Jean C. Augustinack
Jean C. Augustinack Harvard University
Richard D. Hichwa
Richard D. Hichwa University of Iowa
Sandra L. Harris
Sandra L. Harris Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Nancy C. Andreasen
Nancy C. Andreasen University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology programs in the USA opens a range of dynamic academic and professional options. Many students today choose online psychology degrees for flexibility and broad access to top-ranked programs. Whether you’re interested in clinical, counseling, research, or industrial-organizational psychology, online programs offer foundational knowledge and practical skills.

When deciding on the right program, location and school rankings matter. If you’re considering studying in the Southeast, take a look at the best psychology program rankings in Florida or the best psychology degree programs ranking in Georgia for insights on curriculum quality and career outcomes. For those in the Midwest, examine the best psychology degree rankings in Grand Rapids. Students in the northern region can explore top psychology degrees in Grand Forks.

Graduates of online psychology programs can pursue roles such as mental health counselors, school psychologists, human resources specialists, or continue into advanced graduate study. Selecting the right accredited program is the first step to a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter E. Nathan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles