World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sudhansu Chokroverty

Sudhansu Chokroverty

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
15429
World Ranking
3796
National Ranking
1735

Sudhansu Chokroverty publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sudhansu Chokroverty sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 337 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sudhansu Chokroverty D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sudhansu Chokroverty sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sudhansu Chokroverty is affiliated with Seton Hall University in the United States, specializing in research at the intersection of medicine and psychology. Their work primarily focuses on sleep and related disorders, COVID-19 impacts on mental health, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Medicine (13 publications)
  • Psychology (6 publications)

Within these broader fields, their subfields of study encompass:

  • Neurology (4 publications)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience (4 publications)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3 publications)
  • Clinical Psychology (3 publications)
  • Infectious Diseases (3 publications)

Their primary research topics cover:

  • Sleep and related disorders (6 publications)
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 publications)
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 publications)
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 publications)
  • Restless Legs Syndrome Research (4 publications)
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (4 publications)
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 publications)

Sudhansu Chokroverty has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Sleep Medicine (8 publications)
  • Critical Care Medicine (1 publication)
  • The Neurodiagnostic Journal (1 publication)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sushanth Bhat (7 joint publications)
  • Daniel E. Leisman (1 joint publication)
  • Michael O. Harhay (1 joint publication)
  • David J. Lederer (1 joint publication)
  • Michael J. Abramson (1 joint publication)

Some recent notable publications by Sudhansu Chokroverty are:

  • The many faces and fangs of COVID-19: an editorial by Sudhansu Chokroverty, 2020, Sleep Medicine
  • Respiratory-related leg movements vs periodic limb movements in sleep: a scoring conundrum. an editorial, 2020, Sleep Medicine
  • COVID-19: a 21st century cataclysmic pandemic, 2021, Sleep Medicine

Other highly cited papers co-authored with other researchers but related to their field include:

  • Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals, 2020, Critical Care Medicine
  • Sleep disorders and COVID-19, 2021, Sleep Medicine

Best Publications

  • Toward a better definition of the restless legs syndrome

    Arthur S. Walters;Michael S. Aldrich;Richard Allen;Sonia Ancoli‐Israel

  • The visual scoring of sleep in adults

    Michael H. Silber;Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Michael H. Bonnet;Sudhansu Chokroverty

  • Atlas, rules, and recording techniques for the scoring of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in human sleep.

    Mario Giovanni Terzano;Liborio Parrino;Adriano Sherieri;Ronald Chervin

  • Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals

    David J. Lederer;Scott C. Bell;Richard D. Branson;James D. Chalmers

  • The official World Association of Sleep Medicine (WASM) standards for recording and scoring periodic leg movements in sleep (PLMS) and wakefulness (PLMW) developed in collaboration with a task force from the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG)

    Marco Zucconi;Raffaele Ferri;Richard Allen;Paul Christian Baier

  • A questionnaire study of 138 patients with restless legs syndrome: the 'Night-Walkers' survey.

    A. S. Walters;K. Hickey;J. Maltzman;T. Verrico

  • Overview of sleep & sleep disorders.

    S Chokroverty

  • Successful treatment of the idiopathic restless legs syndrome in a randomized double-blind trial of oxycodone versus placebo.

    Arthur S. Walters;Mary L. Wagner;Mary L. Wagner;Wayne A. Hening;Wayne A. Hening;Kenneth Grasing

  • Consensus Report Atlas, rules, and recording techniques for the scoring of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in human sleep

    Mario Giovanni Terzano;Liborio Parrino;Adriano Sherieri;Ronald Chervin

  • Circadian rhythm of periodic limb movements and sensory symptoms of restless legs syndrome

    Claudia Trenkwalder;Wayne A. Hening;Arthur S. Walters;Scott S. Campbell

  • Sleep Disorders Medicine: Basic Science, Technical Considerations, and Clinical Aspects

    Sudhansu Chokroverty

  • Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals.

    Daniel E. Leisman;Michael O. Harhay;David J. Lederer;David J. Lederer;Michael Abramson

  • A double-blind randomized crossover trial of bromocriptine and placebo in restless legs syndrome.

    Arthur S. Walters;Wayne A. Hening;Neil Kavey;Sudhansu Chokroverty;Sudhansu Chokroverty

  • Rise of blood pressure with periodic limb movements in sleep and wakefulness

    Fouzia Siddiqui;Fouzia Siddiqui;Jolanta Strus;Xue Ming;Ihno A. Lee

  • World Association of Sleep Medicine (WASM) 2016 standards for recording and scoring leg movements in polysomnograms developed by a joint task force from the International and the European Restless Legs Syndrome Study Groups (IRLSSG and EURLSSG).

    R Ferri;S Fulda;R P Allen;M Zucconi

  • Positron emission tomographic studies in restless legs syndrome.

    Claudia Trenkwalder;Arthur S. Walters;Wayne A. Hening;Sudhansu Chokroverty

  • The National Sleep Foundation's Sleep Health Index

    Kristen L. Knutson;Julie Phelan;Michael J. Paskow;Anita Roach

  • Literature review of the usefulness of repetitive nerve stimulation and single fiber EMG in the electrodiagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome

    Faye Y. Chiou-Tan;Richard W. Tim;James M. Gilchrist;Cheryl F. Weber

  • A clinical and polysomnographic comparison of neuroleptic-induced akathisia and the idiopathic restless legs syndrome.

    Arthur S. Walters;Wayne Hening;Wayne Hening;Mitchell Rubinstein;Sudhansu Chokroverty;Sudhansu Chokroverty

  • Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology

    Mark Hallett;Sudhansu Chokroverty

  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of clonidine in restless legs syndrome.

    M L Wagner;A S Walters;A S Walters;R G Coleman;W A Hening;W A Hening

  • Practice parameter for repetitive nerve stimulation and single fiber EMG evaluation of adults with suspected myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Summary statement

    Faye Y. Chiou-Tan;Richard W. Tim;James M. Gilchrist;Cheryl F. Weber

  • Sleep and Parkinson's disease: A review of case‐control polysomnography studies

    Tasneem Peeraully;Ming-Hui Yong;Sudhansu Chokroverty;Eng-King Tan

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur S. Walters
Arthur S. Walters Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Wayne A. Hening
Wayne A. Hening Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Pasquale Montagna
Pasquale Montagna University of Bologna
Richard P. Allen
Richard P. Allen Johns Hopkins University
Marco Zucconi
Marco Zucconi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Liborio Parrino
Liborio Parrino University of Parma
Mario Giovanni Terzano
Mario Giovanni Terzano University of Parma
Mark W. Mahowald
Mark W. Mahowald University of Minnesota
Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Peter E. Nathan
Peter E. Nathan University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience but want to explore related fields or flexible study options, a range of online degrees can open doors to exciting careers in mental health, research, and counseling. Fast-track your education with 1 year msw programs online no bsw, which are perfect for those seeking advanced roles in social work—even if your undergraduate degree is not in social work.

For students eager to enter the workforce quickly, an accelerated psychology degree online allows you to complete foundational studies in psychological science at a faster pace. Graduates interested in counseling should consider institutions that are cacrep accredited, ensuring their qualification meets the highest industry standards.

Affordability is an important factor when choosing an online degree. You can compare tuition rates and find a masters in counseling online cost that fits your budget. Whether your interests align with clinical practice, research, therapy, or academic roles, these pathways offer valuable alternatives or complements to a Neuroscience degree.

Best Scientists Citing Sudhansu Chokroverty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles