World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
36067
World Ranking
9253
National Ranking
4774

Jan Bakker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bakker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 517 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jan Bakker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bakker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Bakker is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has a research focus predominantly in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across Surgery, Epidemiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects including:

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation

Jan Bakker has published extensively in several journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Critical Care
  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals" (2020), published in Critical Care Medicine
  • "Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method" (2021), published in Critical Care
  • "Microbial signatures in the lower airways of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients associated with poor clinical outcome" (2021), published in Nature Microbiology
  • "Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation" (2021), published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-based analysis" (2020), published in Critical Care

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jan Bakker include:

  • Glenn Hernández
  • Eduardo Kattan
  • Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón
  • Ricardo Castro
  • Jean-Louis Teboul

Best Publications

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

  • Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock

    Jan Bakker;Philippe Gris;Michel Coffernils;Robert J. Kahn

  • Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

    Tim C. Jansen;Jasper van Bommel;F. Jeanette Schoonderbeek;Steven J. Sleeswijk Visser

  • Multiple-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 546C88: Effect on survival in patients with septic shock*

    Angel López;Jose Angel Lorente;Jay Steingrub;Jan Bakker

  • Blood Lactate Levels Are Superior to Oxygen-Derived Variables in Predicting Outcome in Human Septic Shock

    Jan Bakker;Michel Coffernils;Marc Leon;Philippe Gris

  • Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals

    David J. Lederer;Scott C. Bell;Richard D. Branson;James D. Chalmers

  • The prevalence of compassion fatigue and burnout among healthcare professionals in intensive care units: A systematic review

    Margo M. C. van Mol;Erwin J. O. Kompanje;Dominique D. Benoit;Jan Bakker

  • Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Glenn Hernández;Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón;Lucas Petri Damiani;Elisa Estenssoro

  • Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion.

    Alexandre Lima;Jan Bakker

  • Clinical use of lactate monitoring in critically ill patients

    Jan Bakker;Maarten Wn Nijsten;Tim C Jansen

  • Use of a peripheral perfusion index derived from the pulse oximetry signal as a noninvasive indicator of perfusion.

    Alexandre Pinto Lima;Peter Beelen;Jan Bakker

  • Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Can Ince;E Christiaan Boerma;Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer

  • Soil seed banks in European grasslands: does land use affect regeneration perspectives?

    Renee Bekker;G.L. Verweij;R.E.N. Smith;R. Reine

  • Self‐Organization and Vegetation Collapse in Salt Marsh Ecosystems

    van de Johan Koppel;D van der Wal;Jan Bakker;Pmj Herman

  • Blood lactate monitoring in critically ill patients: A systematic health technology assessment *

    Tim C. Jansen;Jasper van Bommel;Jan Bakker

  • Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at ICU admission predicts for acute kidney injury in adult patients.

    Hilde R. H. de Geus;Jan Bakker;Emmanuel M. E. H. Lesaffre;Jos L. M. L. le Noble

  • The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients.

    Alexandre Lima;Tim C. Jansen;Jasper van Bommel;Can Ince

  • Experiences of critically ill patients in the ICU

    José G.M. Hofhuis;José G.M. Hofhuis;Peter E. Spronk;Henk F. van Stel;Augustinus J.P. Schrijvers

  • A systematic review of implementation strategies for assessment, prevention, and management of ICU delirium and their effect on clinical outcomes

    Zoran Trogrlić;Mathieu van der Jagt;Jan Bakker;Michele C Balas

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

Frequent Co-Authors

Can Ince
Can Ince Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Jean-Louis Teboul
Jean-Louis Teboul University of Paris-Saclay
Giuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio University of Milano-Bicocca
Elie Azoulay
Elie Azoulay Université Paris Cité
Daniel De Backer
Daniel De Backer Université Libre de Bruxelles
Laurent Papazian
Laurent Papazian Aix-Marseille University
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Antoine Vieillard-Baron Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Didier Payen
Didier Payen Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens doors to a broad range of related healthcare fields and educational pathways. Many students are exploring flexible online degree options that offer both convenience and a strong foundation for diverse roles.

For those interested in nursing, nursing programs without teas requirements offer an accessible entry to the field without traditional standardized testing. These programs are ideal for those seeking a streamlined path into nursing.

Beyond direct patient care, management roles in healthcare are growing. Earning one of the best healthcare administration degrees allows professionals to shape policy and improve organizational efficiency from the inside.

Registered nurses wanting to advance quickly should consider adn to msn bridge programs. These accelerated tracks help nurses move into higher-level practice and leadership positions.

Finally, with growing interest in wellness and preventive care, an online degree nutrition can lead to careers in dietetics, health coaching, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Bakker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles