World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
47237
World Ranking
5542
National Ranking
161

Jean-Louis Teboul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Louis Teboul sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 555 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jean-Louis Teboul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Louis Teboul sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-Louis Teboul is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with 322 publications in this field. Within medicine, their work covers several subfields including Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research topics demonstrate a concentration on clinical and critical care areas, with a particular emphasis on:

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Renal function and acid-base balance

The scientist has a substantial number of collaborations, frequently co-authoring with several researchers such as Xavier Monnet, Christopher Lai, Olfa Hamzaoui, Rui Shi, and Daniel De Backer. These collaborative efforts are reflected across many publications.

Jean-Louis Teboul publishes regularly in several scientific journals that focus on intensive and critical care medicine. The most frequent venues include:

  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Critical Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Journal of Intensive Medicine

Some of the notable recent papers include:

  • "Effect of Tocilizumab vs Usual Care in Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 and Moderate or Severe Pneumonia," 2020, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Effect of anakinra versus usual care in adults in hospital with COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate pneumonia (CORIMUNO-ANA-1): a randomised controlled trial," 2021, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals," 2020, Critical Care Medicine
  • "Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?," 2022, Annals of Intensive Care
  • "Personalized mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome," 2021, Critical Care

Best Publications

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

  • Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in ICU Patients: A Critical Analysis of the Evidence

    Frédéric Michard;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

    Frédéric Michard;Sandrine Boussat;Denis Chemla;Nadia Anguel

  • High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Patients with Septic Shock

    Pierre Asfar;Ferhat Meziani;Jean-François Hamel;Fabien Grelon

  • The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy

    Marc Feissel;Frédéric Michard;Jean-Pierre Faller;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Association of TNF2, a TNF-α Promoter Polymorphism, With Septic Shock Susceptibility and Mortality: A Multicenter Study

    Jean-Paul Mira;Alain Cariou;Franck Grall;Christophe Delclaux

  • Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge

    David Osman;Christophe Ridel;Patrick Ray;Xavier Monnet

  • Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.

    Xavier Monnet;Mario Rienzo;David Osman;Nadia Anguel

  • Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy

    Paul E Marik;Xavier Monnet;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Early Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter and Outcomes in Patients With Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Christian Richard;Josiane Warszawski;Nadia Anguel;Nicolas Deye

  • Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals

    David J. Lederer;Scott C. Bell;Richard D. Branson;James D. Chalmers

  • Respiratory Changes in Aortic Blood Velocity as an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock

    Marc Feissel;Frederic Michard;Isabelle Mangin;Olivier Ruyer

  • Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Glenn Hernández;Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón;Lucas Petri Damiani;Elisa Estenssoro

  • Acute left ventricular dysfunction during unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation.

    Francois Lemaire;Jean-Louis Teboul;Luc Cinotti;Guillen Giotto

  • Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study

    Maurizio Cecconi;Christoph Hofer;Jean-Louis Teboul;Ville Pettila

  • Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation

    Frédéric Michard;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock.

    Frédéric Michard;Sami Alaya;Véronique Zarka;Mabrouk Bahloul

  • Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring--a consensus of 16.

    Jean-Louis Vincent;Andrew Rhodes;Azriel Perel;Greg S Martin

  • Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.

    Xavier Monnet;Paul E. Marik;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Daniel De Backer
Daniel De Backer Université Libre de Bruxelles
Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Antoine Vieillard-Baron Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Alain Cariou
Alain Cariou Université Paris Cité
Antonio Artigas
Antonio Artigas Autonomous University of Barcelona
Julia Wendon
Julia Wendon King's College London
Mervyn Singer
Mervyn Singer University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring a future in medicine, there are several flexible and affordable online degree options related to the healthcare sector. Many aspiring nurses start with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, and the cheapest online bsn programs allow students to earn their credentials without the heavy financial burden of traditional schools.

Registered Nurses (RNs) wishing to advance further may consider the cheapest rn to bsn programs, which provide an accelerated and budget-friendly path toward a higher degree. For those with a non-nursing background eager to enter the field, direct msn programs online offer a fast-track route to earn a master’s in nursing without a prior nursing degree.

Ambitious professionals interested in academia, research, or leadership roles may look into an online phd nursing program. These advanced online programs let students achieve terminal degrees while balancing work and family commitments.

By considering these related degree pathways, students can tailor their educational journey to match their career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Louis Teboul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles