World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 110 5542 5206 161 152 555 47237

Jean-Louis Teboul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Louis Teboul between 1955 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Louis Teboul published across 71 years, from 1955 to 2025, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 308 publications in 2012. 45 of the 867 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 308. Peak 308 publications in 2012. 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 308 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 25 publications
1955 2025

867 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Louis Teboul: publications per year, 1955 to 2025
Year Publications
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 4
1990 8
1991 7
1992 10
1993 3
1994 2
1995 11
1996 5
1997 3
1998 7
1999 6
2000 5
2001 9
2002 15
2003 11
2004 9
2005 15
2006 14
2007 25
2008 15
2009 28
2010 16
2011 26
2012 308
2013 21
2014 14
2015 24
2016 15
2017 17
2018 21
2019 37
2020 30
2021 29
2022 24
2023 17
2024 20
2025 25
Total 867
Download as CSV

Jean-Louis Teboul publications per year - data summary

  • Jean-Louis Teboul, a Medicine scholar from University of Paris-Saclay, has 867 publications recorded across 71 years, from 1955 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1955 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 308 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1955, 1979, 1983, 1985 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 26 of the 71 years in the span carry no publications at all (1956, 1957, 1958, 1959 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.3 per year counting only the 45 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 115 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1955-1978: 1 publication (0.0 per year); 1979-2002: 105 publications (4.4 per year); 2003-2025: 761 publications (33.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Jean-Louis Teboul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Louis Teboul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 555 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 555
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean-Louis Teboul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Jean-Louis Teboul, a Medicine scholar from University of Paris-Saclay, records 555 publications - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Jean-Louis Teboul, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Jean-Louis Teboul ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Jean-Louis Teboul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Louis Teboul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429 110
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Jean-Louis Teboul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Jean-Louis Teboul, a Medicine scholar from University of Paris-Saclay, records 110 D-Index - the 73rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 73% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Jean-Louis Teboul, and about 27% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Jean-Louis Teboul ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Jean-Louis Teboul is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with 322 publications in this field. Within medicine, their work covers several subfields including Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research topics demonstrate a concentration on clinical and critical care areas, with a particular emphasis on:

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Renal function and acid-base balance

The scientist has a substantial number of collaborations, frequently co-authoring with several researchers such as Xavier Monnet, Christopher Lai, Olfa Hamzaoui, Rui Shi, and Daniel De Backer. These collaborative efforts are reflected across many publications.

Jean-Louis Teboul publishes regularly in several scientific journals that focus on intensive and critical care medicine. The most frequent venues include:

  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Critical Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Journal of Intensive Medicine

Some of the notable recent papers include:

  • "Effect of Tocilizumab vs Usual Care in Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 and Moderate or Severe Pneumonia," 2020, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Effect of anakinra versus usual care in adults in hospital with COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate pneumonia (CORIMUNO-ANA-1): a randomised controlled trial," 2021, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • "Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals," 2020, Critical Care Medicine
  • "Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?," 2022, Annals of Intensive Care
  • "Personalized mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome," 2021, Critical Care

Best Publications

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

  • Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in ICU Patients: A Critical Analysis of the Evidence

    Frédéric Michard;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

    Frédéric Michard;Sandrine Boussat;Denis Chemla;Nadia Anguel

  • High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Patients with Septic Shock

    Pierre Asfar;Ferhat Meziani;Jean-François Hamel;Fabien Grelon

  • The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy

    Marc Feissel;Frédéric Michard;Jean-Pierre Faller;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Association of TNF2, a TNF-α Promoter Polymorphism, With Septic Shock Susceptibility and Mortality: A Multicenter Study

    Jean-Paul Mira;Alain Cariou;Franck Grall;Christophe Delclaux

  • Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge

    David Osman;Christophe Ridel;Patrick Ray;Xavier Monnet

  • Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.

    Xavier Monnet;Mario Rienzo;David Osman;Nadia Anguel

  • Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy

    Paul E Marik;Xavier Monnet;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Early Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter and Outcomes in Patients With Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Christian Richard;Josiane Warszawski;Nadia Anguel;Nicolas Deye

  • Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals

    David J. Lederer;Scott C. Bell;Richard D. Branson;James D. Chalmers

  • Respiratory Changes in Aortic Blood Velocity as an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock

    Marc Feissel;Frederic Michard;Isabelle Mangin;Olivier Ruyer

  • Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Glenn Hernández;Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón;Lucas Petri Damiani;Elisa Estenssoro

  • Acute left ventricular dysfunction during unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation.

    Francois Lemaire;Jean-Louis Teboul;Luc Cinotti;Guillen Giotto

  • Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study

    Maurizio Cecconi;Christoph Hofer;Jean-Louis Teboul;Ville Pettila

  • Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation

    Frédéric Michard;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock.

    Frédéric Michard;Sami Alaya;Véronique Zarka;Mabrouk Bahloul

  • Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring--a consensus of 16.

    Jean-Louis Vincent;Andrew Rhodes;Azriel Perel;Greg S Martin

  • Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.

    Xavier Monnet;Paul E. Marik;Jean-Louis Teboul

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Daniel De Backer
Daniel De Backer Université Libre de Bruxelles
Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Antoine Vieillard-Baron Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Alain Cariou
Alain Cariou Université Paris Cité
Antonio Artigas
Antonio Artigas Autonomous University of Barcelona
Julia Wendon
Julia Wendon King's College London
Mervyn Singer
Mervyn Singer University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring a future in medicine, there are several flexible and affordable online degree options related to the healthcare sector. Many aspiring nurses start with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, and the cheapest online bsn programs allow students to earn their credentials without the heavy financial burden of traditional schools.

Registered Nurses (RNs) wishing to advance further may consider the cheapest rn to bsn programs, which provide an accelerated and budget-friendly path toward a higher degree. For those with a non-nursing background eager to enter the field, direct msn programs online offer a fast-track route to earn a master’s in nursing without a prior nursing degree.

Ambitious professionals interested in academia, research, or leadership roles may look into an online phd nursing program. These advanced online programs let students achieve terminal degrees while balancing work and family commitments.

By considering these related degree pathways, students can tailor their educational journey to match their career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Louis Teboul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles