Daniel De Backer mainly focuses on Anesthesia, Septic shock, Sepsis, Intensive care and Microcirculation. His study in the field of Cardiac index, Cardiac output, Gastric tonometry and Mechanical ventilation is also linked to topics like Carbon dioxide. His Septic shock research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Nitric oxide synthase, Shock and Enzyme inhibitor.
His studies in Sepsis integrate themes in fields like Inflammation and Pathophysiology. His Intensive care study is concerned with Intensive care medicine in general. The various areas that Daniel De Backer examines in his Microcirculation study include Hemodynamics, Blood flow, Cardiology and Organ dysfunction.
His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Anesthesia, Cardiology and Septic shock. Many of his studies on Internal medicine involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Surgery. Daniel De Backer combines subjects such as Resuscitation, MEDLINE and Anesthesiology with his study of Intensive care medicine.
His work on Blood flow, Cardiogenic shock and Circulatory system as part of general Cardiology study is frequently linked to In patient, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Septic shock research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Shock and Norepinephrine. As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Sepsis, narrowing it down to issues related to the Microcirculation, and often Organ dysfunction.
Daniel De Backer mostly deals with Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Cardiology, Septic shock and Sepsis. In his research, Renal blood flow is intimately related to Surgery, which falls under the overarching field of Internal medicine. Daniel De Backer has included themes like Surviving Sepsis Campaign, MEDLINE and Anesthesiology in his Intensive care medicine study.
Daniel De Backer focuses mostly in the field of Cardiology, narrowing it down to matters related to Shock and, in some cases, CIRCULATORY FAILURE. His research integrates issues of Organ dysfunction, Norepinephrine, Blood pressure, Inotrope and Resuscitation in his study of Septic shock. He works mostly in the field of Sepsis, limiting it down to topics relating to Acute kidney injury and, in certain cases, Renal replacement therapy, as a part of the same area of interest.
Intensive care medicine, Septic shock, Sepsis, Anesthesiology and Intensive care are his primary areas of study. His work carried out in the field of Intensive care medicine brings together such families of science as Pulmonary artery catheter and MEDLINE. His Septic shock research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Norepinephrine, Shock, Resuscitation, Emergency medicine and Microcirculation.
His work deals with themes such as Abdominal sepsis and Hemodynamics, Cardiac output, Cardiology, which intersect with Microcirculation. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign research Daniel De Backer does as part of his general Sepsis study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Global health, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His work in the fields of Pain medicine overlaps with other areas such as Task force.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016
Andrew Rhodes;Laura E. Evans;Waleed Alhazzani;Mitchell M. Levy.
Intensive Care Medicine (2017)
Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock
Daniel De Backer;Patrick Biston;Jacques Devriendt;Christian Madl.
The New England Journal of Medicine (2010)
Microvascular Blood Flow Is Altered in Patients with Sepsis
Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur;Jean-Charles Preiser;Marc-Jacques Dubois.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (2002)
Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock.
Yasser Sakr;Marc-Jacques Dubois;Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur.
Critical Care Medicine (2004)
Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale.
Intensive Care Medicine (2014)
How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference.
Daniel De Backer;Steven Hollenberg;Christiaan Boerma;Peter Goedhart.
Critical Care (2007)
Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume
Daniel De Backer;Sarah Heenen;Michaël Piagnerelli;Marc Koch.
Intensive Care Medicine (2005)
The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects
Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur;Marc-Jacques Dubois;Yasser Sakr.
Critical Care Medicine (2006)
A Unified Theory of Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics and the tubular cell adaptation to injury
Hernando Gomez;Can Ince;Daniel De Backer;Peter Pickkers.
Shock (2014)
Microvascular alterations in patients with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur;Marc-Jacques Dubois;Yasser Sakr.
American Heart Journal (2004)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Université Libre de Bruxelles
New York University
Université Paris Cité
Université Paris Cité
University of Pittsburgh
Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Uppsala University
Erasmus University Rotterdam
University College London
Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Publications: 132
Chalmers University of Technology
NUSOD Institute
RWTH Aachen University
Imperial College London
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Bayer (Germany)
Max Planck Society
University of Helsinki
Macquarie University
University of Chicago
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Leibniz Association
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
University of California, San Francisco
Carleton University