D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Medicine D-index 87 Citations 40,121 390 World Ranking 7061 National Ranking 74

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Cardiology

Daniel De Backer mainly focuses on Anesthesia, Septic shock, Sepsis, Intensive care and Microcirculation. His study in the field of Cardiac index, Cardiac output, Gastric tonometry and Mechanical ventilation is also linked to topics like Carbon dioxide. His Septic shock research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacology, Nitric oxide synthase, Shock and Enzyme inhibitor.

His studies in Sepsis integrate themes in fields like Inflammation and Pathophysiology. His Intensive care study is concerned with Intensive care medicine in general. The various areas that Daniel De Backer examines in his Microcirculation study include Hemodynamics, Blood flow, Cardiology and Organ dysfunction.

His most cited work include:

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 (2235 citations)
  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. (1523 citations)
  • Microvascular Blood Flow Is Altered in Patients with Sepsis (1073 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Anesthesia, Cardiology and Septic shock. Many of his studies on Internal medicine involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Surgery. Daniel De Backer combines subjects such as Resuscitation, MEDLINE and Anesthesiology with his study of Intensive care medicine.

His work on Blood flow, Cardiogenic shock and Circulatory system as part of general Cardiology study is frequently linked to In patient, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Septic shock research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Shock and Norepinephrine. As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Sepsis, narrowing it down to issues related to the Microcirculation, and often Organ dysfunction.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (33.89%)
  • Intensive care medicine (27.81%)
  • Anesthesia (27.26%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Internal medicine (33.89%)
  • Intensive care medicine (27.81%)
  • Cardiology (24.68%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Daniel De Backer mostly deals with Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Cardiology, Septic shock and Sepsis. In his research, Renal blood flow is intimately related to Surgery, which falls under the overarching field of Internal medicine. Daniel De Backer has included themes like Surviving Sepsis Campaign, MEDLINE and Anesthesiology in his Intensive care medicine study.

Daniel De Backer focuses mostly in the field of Cardiology, narrowing it down to matters related to Shock and, in some cases, CIRCULATORY FAILURE. His research integrates issues of Organ dysfunction, Norepinephrine, Blood pressure, Inotrope and Resuscitation in his study of Septic shock. He works mostly in the field of Sepsis, limiting it down to topics relating to Acute kidney injury and, in certain cases, Renal replacement therapy, as a part of the same area of interest.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 (2235 citations)
  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. (1523 citations)
  • THE ENDOTHELIUM IN SEPSIS. (212 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Cardiology

Intensive care medicine, Septic shock, Sepsis, Anesthesiology and Intensive care are his primary areas of study. His work carried out in the field of Intensive care medicine brings together such families of science as Pulmonary artery catheter and MEDLINE. His Septic shock research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Norepinephrine, Shock, Resuscitation, Emergency medicine and Microcirculation.

His work deals with themes such as Abdominal sepsis and Hemodynamics, Cardiac output, Cardiology, which intersect with Microcirculation. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign research Daniel De Backer does as part of his general Sepsis study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Global health, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His work in the fields of Pain medicine overlaps with other areas such as Task force.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

Andrew Rhodes;Laura E. Evans;Waleed Alhazzani;Mitchell M. Levy.
Intensive Care Medicine (2017)

6125 Citations

Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock

Daniel De Backer;Patrick Biston;Jacques Devriendt;Christian Madl.
The New England Journal of Medicine (2010)

1656 Citations

Microvascular Blood Flow Is Altered in Patients with Sepsis

Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur;Jean-Charles Preiser;Marc-Jacques Dubois.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (2002)

1508 Citations

Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock.

Yasser Sakr;Marc-Jacques Dubois;Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur.
Critical Care Medicine (2004)

1319 Citations

Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale.
Intensive Care Medicine (2014)

1164 Citations

How to evaluate the microcirculation: report of a round table conference.

Daniel De Backer;Steven Hollenberg;Christiaan Boerma;Peter Goedhart.
Critical Care (2007)

919 Citations

Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume

Daniel De Backer;Sarah Heenen;Michaël Piagnerelli;Marc Koch.
Intensive Care Medicine (2005)

821 Citations

The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects

Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur;Marc-Jacques Dubois;Yasser Sakr.
Critical Care Medicine (2006)

561 Citations

A Unified Theory of Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics and the tubular cell adaptation to injury

Hernando Gomez;Can Ince;Daniel De Backer;Peter Pickkers.
Shock (2014)

551 Citations

Microvascular alterations in patients with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

Daniel De Backer;Jacques Creteur;Marc-Jacques Dubois;Yasser Sakr.
American Heart Journal (2004)

506 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Daniel De Backer

Can Ince

Can Ince

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Publications: 269

Jean Louis Vincent

Jean Louis Vincent

Université Libre de Bruxelles

Publications: 252

Jason A. Roberts

Jason A. Roberts

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Publications: 148

Jeffrey Lipman

Jeffrey Lipman

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Publications: 134

Jean-Louis Teboul

Jean-Louis Teboul

Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale

Publications: 132

Rinaldo Bellomo

Rinaldo Bellomo

University of Melbourne

Publications: 126

Jan Bakker

Jan Bakker

New York University

Publications: 108

Fabio Silvio Taccone

Fabio Silvio Taccone

Université Libre de Bruxelles

Publications: 99

John A. Kellum

John A. Kellum

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 74

Mervyn Singer

Mervyn Singer

University College London

Publications: 72

Michael R. Pinsky

Michael R. Pinsky

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 71

Antoine Vieillard-Baron

Antoine Vieillard-Baron

Université Paris Cité

Publications: 59

Alexandre Mebazaa

Alexandre Mebazaa

Université Paris Cité

Publications: 56

Claudio Ronco

Claudio Ronco

University of Padua

Publications: 53

Paul E. Marik

Paul E. Marik

Eastern Virginia Medical School

Publications: 52

Bertrand Guidet

Bertrand Guidet

Université Paris Cité

Publications: 50

Trending Scientists

Lars-Erik Gadde

Lars-Erik Gadde

Chalmers University of Technology

Joachim Piprek

Joachim Piprek

NUSOD Institute

Dirk Wouters

Dirk Wouters

RWTH Aachen University

Geoffrey F. Hewitt

Geoffrey F. Hewitt

Imperial College London

R. S. Jangid

R. S. Jangid

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

Catherine Feuillet

Catherine Feuillet

Bayer (Germany)

Jane E. Parker

Jane E. Parker

Max Planck Society

Tomi P. Mäkelä

Tomi P. Mäkelä

University of Helsinki

Ian D. Jonsen

Ian D. Jonsen

Macquarie University

Deborah J. Nelson

Deborah J. Nelson

University of Chicago

Ross A. D. Bathgate

Ross A. D. Bathgate

Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

Dietrich Althausen

Dietrich Althausen

Leibniz Association

David Dunning

David Dunning

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Howard M. Eisenberg

Howard M. Eisenberg

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Choh Hao Li

Choh Hao Li

University of California, San Francisco

Linda Duxbury

Linda Duxbury

Carleton University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.