World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
57069
World Ranking
4312
National Ranking
2355

Michael R. Pinsky publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Pinsky sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 810 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael R. Pinsky D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Pinsky sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael R. Pinsky is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, and Biomedical Engineering. These subfields underline the interdisciplinary nature of their work.

Their research topics include a wide range of subjects within critical and intensive care medicine. Key topics covered are:

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Michael R. Pinsky's recent publications provide insight into their areas of interest and contributions to critical care medicine. Selected recent papers include:

  • "How can assessing hemodynamics help to assess volume status?" (2022), published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation" (2021), published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Effective hemodynamic monitoring" (2022), published in Critical Care
  • "Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine" (2022), published in Critical Care
  • "The prediction of fluid responsiveness" (2022), published in Intensive Care Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research network include:

  • Gilles Clermont
  • Artur Dubrawski
  • Salah S. Al-Zaiti
  • Daniel De Backer
  • Xavier Monnet

Michael R. Pinsky's work appears regularly in several key publication venues within critical and intensive care domains. These venues include:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Critical Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Annals of Intensive Care
  • Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

    Derek C. Angus;Walter T. Linde-Zwirble;Jeffrey Lidicker;Gilles Clermont

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

  • Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

    Frédéric Michard;Sandrine Boussat;Denis Chemla;Nadia Anguel

  • Serum Cytokine Levels in Human Septic Shock: Relation to Multiple-System Organ Failure and Mortality

    Michaël Pinsky;Jean Louis Vincent;Jacques Devière;Maria-Luisa Alegre

  • Effect of Intrathoracic Pressure on Left Ventricular Performance

    Andrew J. Buda;Michael R. Pinsky;Neil B. Ingels;George T. Daughters

  • Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study.

    John A. Kellum;Lan Kong;Mitchell P. Fink;Lisa A. Weissfeld

  • Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.

    Xavier Monnet;Mario Rienzo;David Osman;Nadia Anguel

  • Patients' recollections of stressful experiences while receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit.

    Armando J Rotondi;Lakshmipathi Chelluri;Carl Sirio;Aaron Mendelsohn

  • The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, part 2: Ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling. Acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Antonio Artigas;Gordon R. Bernard;Jean Carlet;Didier Dreyfuss

  • Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring--a consensus of 16.

    Jean-Louis Vincent;Andrew Rhodes;Azriel Perel;Greg S Martin

  • Functional hemodynamic monitoring

    Michael R Pinsky;Didier Payen

  • Quantitative Assessment of Alterations in Regional Left Ventricular Contractility With Color-Coded Tissue Doppler Echocardiography Comparison With Sonomicrometry and Pressure-Volume Relations

    John Gorcsan;David P. Strum;William A. Mandarino;Vijay K. Gulati

  • Renal failure in the ICU: Comparison of the impact of acute renal failure and end-stage renal disease on ICU outcomes

    Gilles Clermont;Christopher G. Acker;Derek C. Angus;Carl A. Sirio

  • Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP.

    Frédéric Michard;Denis Chemla;Christian Richard;Marc Wysocki

  • Long-term mortality and quality of life after prolonged mechanical ventilation*

    Lakshmipathi Chelluri;Kyung Ah Im;Steven H. Belle;Richard Schulz

  • Cardiovascular Issues in Respiratory Care

    Michael R. Pinsky

  • Long-term outcome of critically ill elderly patients requiring intensive care

    Lakshmipathi Chelluri;Michael R. Pinsky;Michael P. Donahoe;Ake Grenvik

  • Quality-adjusted survival in the first year after the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Derek C. Angus;Amjad A. Musthafa;Gilles Clermont;Martin F. Griffin

  • Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on preoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery

    Robert D. Sanders;Fintan Hughes;Andrew Shaw;Annemarie Thompson

  • Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care

    Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer;Massimo Antonelli;Richard Beale

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Derek C. Angus
Derek C. Angus University of Pittsburgh
John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
John Gorcsan
John Gorcsan Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Jean-Louis Teboul
Jean-Louis Teboul University of Paris-Saclay
Laurent Brochard
Laurent Brochard St. Michael's Hospital
Daniel De Backer
Daniel De Backer Université Libre de Bruxelles
Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Antoine Vieillard-Baron Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Mervyn Singer
Mervyn Singer University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide array of related online degrees and career pathways. Many healthcare professions, such as nutrition and nursing, now offer flexible online learning options for aspiring professionals and working adults.

For example, those interested in the diet and wellness sector might consider earning a nutritionist online degree to start a career as a nutritionist or dietitian. Meanwhile, registered nurses can advance their education with an rn to bsn online with no clinicals, saving valuable time while expanding career opportunities.

Management positions in healthcare are also in demand, and working adults can pursue the whats the best online mha program for working adults to gain leadership skills and advance within the industry. Those looking to reach the highest levels of clinical practice can choose the shortest msn to dnp program, making it possible to earn a doctorate in nursing more efficiently.

These online programs allow for greater flexibility, making it easier for aspiring healthcare professionals to balance work, life, and study as they progress toward their career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Pinsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles