World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
40378
World Ranking
7933
National Ranking
4127

Nathan I. Shapiro publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan I. Shapiro sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 418 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nathan I. Shapiro D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan I. Shapiro sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan I. Shapiro is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily centers on medicine, with a focus on infectious diseases, epidemiology, health, surgery, and critical care and intensive care medicine.

The scientist has contributed extensively to studies involving SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, sepsis diagnosis and treatment, COVID-19 clinical research studies, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, hemodynamic monitoring and therapy, influenza virus research studies, and trauma, hemostasis, coagulopathy, and resuscitation.

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Symptom Duration and Risk Factors for Delayed Return to Usual Health Among Outpatients with COVID-19 in a Multistate Health Care Systems Network - United States, March-June 2020, 2020, published in MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Association Between mRNA Vaccination and COVID-19 Hospitalization and Disease Severity, 2021, published in JAMA
  • Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study, 2022, published in BMJ
  • Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on Clinical Status at 14 Days in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19, 2020, published in JAMA
  • Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines Against COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Adults Aged ≥65 Years - United States, January-March 2021, 2021, published in MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Nathan I. Shapiro frequently collaborates with a number of coauthors including Wesley H. Self, Adit A. Ginde, Kevin W. Gibbs, Jay S. Steingrub, and Akram Khan. These collaborative relationships reflect consistent research partnerships across multiple studies.

The scientist's research has been published in prominent venues that include:

  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine
  • JAMA Network Open

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Protocol-Based Care for Early Septic Shock

    Donald M. Yealy;John A. Kellum;David T. Huang;Lisa A. Weissfeld

  • Symptom Duration and Risk Factors for Delayed Return to Usual Health Among Outpatients with COVID-19 in a Multistate Health Care Systems Network - United States, March-June 2020.

    Mark W. Tenforde;Sara S. Kim;Christopher J. Lindsell;Erica Billig Rose

  • Lactate Clearance vs Central Venous Oxygen Saturation as Goals of Early Sepsis Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Alan E. Jones;Nathan I. Shapiro;Stephen Trzeciak;Ryan C. Arnold

  • Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury.

    Kianoush B Kashani;Ali Al-Khafaji;Thomas Ardiles;Antonio Artigas

  • Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality

    J. Hope Kilgannon;Alan E. Jones;Nathan I. Shapiro;Mark G. Angelos

  • Serum Lactate as a Predictor of Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Infection

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Michael D. Howell;Daniel Talmor;Larry A. Nathanson

  • Association Between mRNA Vaccination and COVID-19 Hospitalization and Disease Severity.

    Mark W Tenforde;Wesley H Self;Katherine Adams;Manjusha Gaglani

  • Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis.

    Ryan C. Arnold;Nathan I. Shapiro;Alan E. Jones;Christa Schorr

  • Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Richard E. Wolfe;Richard B. Moore;Eric Smith

  • The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis

    Ryo Uchimido;Eric P. Schmidt;Nathan I. Shapiro

  • National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments.

    Henry E. Wang;Nathan I. Shapiro;Derek C. Angus;Donald M. Yealy

  • Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis

    Stephen Trzeciak;Jonathan V. McCoy;R. Phillip Dellinger;Ryan C. Arnold

  • Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.

    Nathan I. Shapiro;Michael D. Howell;Daniel Talmor;Dermot Lahey

  • Occult hypoperfusion and mortality in patients with suspected infection.

    Michael D. Howell;Michael Donnino;Peter Clardy;Daniel Talmor

  • Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

    Can Ince;E Christiaan Boerma;Maurizio Cecconi;Daniel De Backer

  • Association Between Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Mortality from Septic Shock in Patients Treated with a Quantitative Resuscitation Protocol

    Michael A. Puskarich;Stephen Trzeciak;Nathan I. Shapiro;Ryan C. Arnold

  • Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on Clinical Status at 14 Days in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Wesley H. Self;Matthew W. Semler;Lindsay M. Leither;Lindsay M. Leither;Jonathan D. Casey

  • Demonstration of High‐fidelity Simulation Team Training for Emergency Medicine

    Stephen D. Small;Richard C. Wuerz;Richard C. Wuerz;Robert Simon;Nathan Shapiro

  • Diagnosing Appendicitis: Evidence-Based Review of the Diagnostic Approach in 2014

    Daniel J. Shogilev;Nicolaj Duus;Stephen R. Odom;Nathan I. Shapiro

  • Relationship Between Supranormal Oxygen Tension and Outcome After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest

    J. Hope Kilgannon;Alan E. Jones;Joseph E. Parrillo;R. Phillip Dellinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Talmor
Daniel Talmor Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
William C. Aird
William C. Aird Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Christopher J. Lindsell
Christopher J. Lindsell Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Todd W. Rice
Todd W. Rice Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Monika M. Safford
Monika M. Safford Cornell University
Derek C. Angus
Derek C. Angus University of Pittsburgh
Long Ngo
Long Ngo Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
John A. Kellum
John A. Kellum University of Pittsburgh
Jeffrey A. Kline
Jeffrey A. Kline Indiana University
Manish M. Patel
Manish M. Patel Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the medical field but seeking flexible learning options, a growing number of best dnp programs online offer advanced nursing education while accommodating busy schedules. These programs are ideal for registered nurses aiming for leadership or specialized clinical roles.

Pharmacists are in high demand, and you can now pursue your career with an online pharmacy degree. These accredited online programs cover essential topics in pharmacology and patient care, preparing graduates for licensure and professional success.

Healthcare administration is another rewarding career avenue. Earning an online mhi (Master’s in Health Information) degree can lead to roles in health informatics, data management, and systems analysis for hospitals and healthcare providers.

For those interested in administrative healthcare roles, medical billing and coding online courses offer a direct pathway into this vital support field. These courses provide practical knowledge for managing health records and billing processes, making them a popular choice for entry-level healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan I. Shapiro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles