World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
28869
World Ranking
13145
National Ranking
6708

Jeffrey A. Kline publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey A. Kline sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 488 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeffrey A. Kline D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey A. Kline sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey A. Kline is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on internal medicine and cardiovascular studies. Their research has been published predominantly in venues related to emergency medicine and thrombosis.

The scientist's research spans several main fields including:

  • Medicine

Key subfields covered in their work include:

  • Internal Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Infectious Diseases

The main topics Jeffrey A. Kline has addressed in their research are:

  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies

Frequent publication venues for their work include the following journals:

  • Academic Emergency Medicine
  • Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Blood Advances
  • BMJ Open
  • Emergency Medicine Journal

The scientist has worked alongside several frequent coauthors, notably:

  • Carlos A. Camargo (16 publications)
  • Lauren K. Stewart (11 publications)
  • Christopher Kabrhel (10 publications)
  • Kristen E. Nordenholz (10 publications)
  • Grégoire Le Gal (9 publications)

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Jeffrey A. Kline are:

  • "Venous Thromboembolism During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Risk Factors, Diagnostic Testing, and Treatment," 2022, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
  • "Safety and Efficiency of Diagnostic Strategies for Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups," 2021, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism," 2020, Blood Advances
  • "Randomized Trial of Therapy Dogs Versus Deliberative Coloring (Art Therapy) to Reduce Stress in Emergency Medicine Providers," 2020, Academic Emergency Medicine
  • "Derivation and Validation of a 4-Level Clinical Pretest Probability Score for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism to Safely Decrease Imaging Testing," 2021, JAMA Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Management of Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism, Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis, and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Michael R. Jaff;M. Sean McMurtry;Stephen L. Archer;Mary Cushman

  • Lactate Clearance vs Central Venous Oxygen Saturation as Goals of Early Sepsis Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Alan E. Jones;Nathan I. Shapiro;Stephen Trzeciak;Ryan C. Arnold

  • The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation.

    Alan E. Jones;Stephen Trzeciak;Jeffrey A. Kline

  • Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients

    Alan E. Jones;Vivek S. Tayal;D Matthew Sullivan;Jeffrey A. Kline

  • Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

    J. A. Kline;A. M. Mitchell;C. Kabrhel;P. B. Richman

  • 2-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker : The ADAPT trial

    Martin Than;Louise Cullen;Louise Cullen;Sally Aldous;William A Parsonage;William A Parsonage

  • Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule‐out criteria

    Jeffrey A. Kline;D. M. Courtney;C. Kabrhel;C. L. Moore

  • Association Between Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Mortality from Septic Shock in Patients Treated with a Quantitative Resuscitation Protocol

    Michael A. Puskarich;Stephen Trzeciak;Nathan I. Shapiro;Ryan C. Arnold

  • Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department: Initial Report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry)

    Charles V. Pollack;Donald Schreiber;Samuel Z. Goldhaber;David Slattery

  • Determination of left ventricular function by emergency physician echocardiography of hypotensive patients.

    Christopher L. Moore;Geoffrey A. Rose;Vivek S. Tayal;D. Matthew Sullivan

  • D-Dimer Concentrations in Normal Pregnancy: New Diagnostic Thresholds Are Needed

    Jeffrey A. Kline;Ginger W. Williams;Jackeline Hernandez-Nino

  • American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

    Wendy Lim;Grégoire Le Gal;Shannon M Bates;Marc Philip Righini;Marc Philip Righini

  • Incidence of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in the Outpatient Setting

    Alice M. Mitchell;Alan E. Jones;James A. Tumlin;Jeffrey A. Kline

  • Procalcitonin Test in the Diagnosis of Bacteremia: A Meta-analysis

    Alan E. Jones;James F. Fiechtl;Michael D. Brown;Jason J. Ballew

  • Treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism with tenecteplase or placebo: Cardiopulmonary outcomes at 3 months: Multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial

    Jeffrey Kline;K. E. Nordenholz;D. M. Courtney;C. Kabrhel

  • Prospective External Validation of the Clinical Effectiveness of an Emergency Department-Based Early Goal-Directed Therapy Protocol for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

    Alan E. Jones;Anne Focht;James M. Horton;Jeffrey A. Kline

  • Assessment of Cardiac Stress From Massive Pulmonary Embolism With 12-Lead ECG

    Kurt R. Daniel;D. Mark Courtney;Jeffrey A. Kline

  • The Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid A Randomized Trial

    Erik P. Hess;Meghan A. Knoedler;Nilay D. Shah;Jeffrey A. Kline

  • Serial Procalcitonin Predicts Mortality in Severe Sepsis Patients: Results From the Multicenter Procalcitonin MOnitoring SEpsis (MOSES) Study.

    Philipp Schuetz;Robert Birkhahn;Robert Sherwin;Alan E. Jones

  • Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in the Research Setting: Knowledge Gaps and Pathways Forward. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

    Tim Lahm;Ivor S. Douglas;Stephen L. Archer;Harm J. Bogaard

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathan I. Shapiro
Nathan I. Shapiro Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Charles V. Pollack
Charles V. Pollack Thomas Jefferson University
Carlos A. Camargo
Carlos A. Camargo Harvard University
Samuel Z. Goldhaber
Samuel Z. Goldhaber Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ian G. Stiell
Ian G. Stiell University of Ottawa
Judd E. Hollander
Judd E. Hollander Thomas Jefferson University
Christopher M. Reid
Christopher M. Reid Monash University
Stephen L. Archer
Stephen L. Archer Queen's University
Alan S. Maisel
Alan S. Maisel University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative routes in healthcare and medicine can open doors to rewarding careers without following the traditional medical school path. Online degree programs in nursing and the allied health professions offer flexibility—making them ideal for those balancing work and other responsibilities.

One option to advance as a registered nurse is to research rn to bsn cheapest programs, which are affordable and can be completed mostly online. If you already have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, you may qualify for non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs that provide a fast track into advanced nursing roles.

Entry requirements vary widely, so researching easiest nursing programs to get into can help you find a path suited to your academic background. Beyond nursing, programs in health administration and medical billing can also lead to stable careers; many offer support such as financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes.

Choosing the right online degree can give you the skills and credentials needed for growing healthcare fields, often with less time and cost than traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey A. Kline

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles